1 / 8

Allocation Of Marginal Loss Revenue Fund

Allocation Of Marginal Loss Revenue Fund. Status Report June 16, 2003 Dave LaPlante. Loss Revenue Allocation Why RTLO?.

moriah
Download Presentation

Allocation Of Marginal Loss Revenue Fund

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Allocation Of Marginal Loss Revenue Fund Status Report June 16, 2003 Dave LaPlante

  2. Loss Revenue AllocationWhy RTLO? • In support of the Bi-lateral Energy markets in NEPOOL, it is important to maintain a “pure” energy product; one that is not encumbered with settlement adjustments imposed by the SMD settlement process • Counter-parties can agree on a price and evaluate the effectiveness of the transaction based on final LMP with no adjustments

  3. Current Settlement Allocations • Auction Revenue Rights: RTLO • Year End Excess Congestion Revenue: Under funded FTR’s and RTLO • Economic Operating Reserve: • DALO • RTLO Deviation • Daily RMR • DALO (Reliability Region) • RTLO Deviation (Reliability Region)

  4. Current Settlement Allocations, cont. • Regulation Operating Reserve: • Regulation Obligation based on RTLO +/- bilateral purchases or sales of Regulation • VAR Operating Reserve: • Schedule 2 of NOATT • SCR Operating Reserve: • Schedule 19 of NOATT

  5. Current Loss Allocation • Loss Revenue Allocation: RTALO • Does not value locational price differences by using MW interchange • Impacts parties that are “net RTALO sellers” to the market by charging for additional Loss Revenue beyond the calculated Loss Revenue Fund • Is inconsistent with allocation of other settlement obligations shown above

  6. Current Loss Allocation, cont. • Internal bilateral transactions for energy are purely financial and have no impact on actual losses in either the DA or RT markets • Energy trades must wait for final NEPOOL settlement before evaluating effectiveness of energy transactions

  7. Other Allocation Alternatives • Several methods have been evaluated • Balanced FTR’s • Directional FTR’s • Spot FTR’s • Complex processes to implement • Complex to evaluate market value and effectiveness • May not provide a complete hedge against losses

  8. Other Allocation Alternatives, cont. • Final result of complex methods would allocate Loss Revenue to RTLO via FTR like process • Simple solution: Assign Loss Revenue to RTLO

More Related