1 / 129

Educator Effectiveness System Overview

Educator Effectiveness System Overview. Understanding Hawaii’s Educator Effectiveness System. Objectives for Today. Why a new system?. Historically, evaluation systems have not supported professional growth or improved effectiveness of all teachers

Download Presentation

Educator Effectiveness System Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Educator Effectiveness System Overview Understanding Hawaii’s Educator Effectiveness System

  2. Objectives for Today

  3. Why a new system? • Historically, evaluation systems have not supported professional growth or improved effectiveness of all teachers • The EES will provide data that supports school improvement and gives teachers tools to make their classroom practice more effective • When done right, a teacher evaluation can help identify and encourage classroom practices that promote real student learning • When teachers succeed, students succeed

  4. Goals for EES Year 3

  5. The EES Uses Multiple Measures • Student Growth and Learning • Teacher Practice • Hawaii Growth Model • Student Learning Objectives • Classroom Observations • Core Professionalism • Tripod Student Survey • Working Portfolio (non-classroom) • Educator Effectiveness Data • Improved Student Outcomes

  6. Calculating Weighting

  7. Common Core Shifts

  8. EES Timeline

  9. Expectations for 2013 - 2014

  10. EES on PDE3

  11. Introduction to the Hawaii Growth Model Educator Effectiveness System Training

  12. Objectives for Today

  13. The EES Uses Multiple Measures • Student Growth and Learning • Teacher Practice • Hawaii Growth Model • Student Learning Objectives • Classroom Observations • Core Professionalism • Tripod Student Survey • Working Portfolio (non-classroom) • Educator Effectiveness Data • Improved Student Outcomes

  14. SGP Is New for Everyone Full EES Implementation

  15. Questions Answered by SGP • What is? • What should be? • What could be? • How much growth did a student make since last tested? • How much growth would be enough for a student to meet proficiency standards? • How much growth has been made by students with similar score histories?

  16. SGP Data complements SLOs

  17. SGP Impacts All Levels Impact

  18. Proficiency Measures Status Proficiency metrics measure achievement relative to standards criteria for a given point in time

  19. Growth Measures Progress Student growth metrics factor in historical data to measure the pace of progress over time. How do we know if students and schools are making enough progress?

  20. Video: What is Growth? Answer the following questions: • What are the fundamentaldifferences between looking at proficiency vs. looking at growth? • How does context influence our interpretation of how well a student has progressed? • What does a growth percentile tell us?

  21. Video: What is Growth? • http://vimeo.com/47277588

  22. Video: What is Growth? Answer the following questions: • What are the fundamentaldifferences between looking at proficiency vs. looking at growth? • How does context influence our interpretation of how well a student has progressed? • What does a growth percentile tell us?

  23. SGP Is a Normative Measure A Student Growth Percentile (SGP) defines how much relative growth a student made, compared to the growth of his or her Academic Peer Group

  24. Fair Comparisons Are Necessary Maria Martha

  25. Fair Comparisons Are Necessary Maria Monica Maria’s sixth grade Student Growth Percentile is determined by comparing her new results against peers with similar score histories.

  26. Academic Peer Groups

  27. Activity: Experiencing SGP • Use the Student Growth Index Cards • Form a group with all of the “students” with the same 3rd grade scale score – academic peers. • Within your academic peer group get in order by 4th grade scale score. • Turn your cards over and compare your growth percentiles.

  28. Interpreting SGP Is Easy 77th In 6th Grade, Maria scored higher than 77% of her academic peers. 99 35 1 65 Low Growth High Growth Typical Growth

  29. Each Growth Level Is ≈⅓ of Group

  30. Many Reports Are Available

  31. Reading a Student Level Report Proficiency Level 3rd Grade Math Score

  32. Reading a Student Level Report Next Year Trajectory

  33. Reading a Student Level Report 4th Grade Math Score

  34. Reading a Student Level Report Next Year Trajectory

  35. Reading a Student Level Report 5th Grade Report

  36. Reading a Student Level Report 6th Grade Report

  37. Data Limitations Impact Model

  38. Student-Level Growth Reports • Show student growth and achievement over time in mathematics and reading. • Include recent grade levels for which assessment results are available. • Indicate low, typical, high growth each year. • Provide growth projections for the next tested grade level.

  39. Jasmine Hanson Hawaii Elementary

  40. Paul Adams Hawaii Middle

  41. High Growth - Not Proficient

  42. High Growth - Proficient

  43. Student-Level Reports Help • Flag potential weaknesses in prior knowledge • Alert educators to students at risk of falling far behind • Inform student grouping decisions • Set realistic goals for student performance • Motivate students

  44. SGP Classroom-Level Report Exceeds Proficiency Meets Proficiency Approaches Proficiency Well Below Proficiency

  45. SGP Classroom-Level Report Median = 42 Exceeds Proficiency Meets Proficiency ApproachesProficiency WellBelowProficiency

  46. SGP Classroom-Level Report Low Growth – Proficient High Growth – Proficient Exceeds Proficiency Meets Proficiency Approaches Proficiency Well Below Proficiency Low Growth – Not Proficient High Growth – Not Proficient

  47. Using Classroom-Level Reports • Consider from two perspectives: • Different questions guide the data analysis from each perspective

  48. Key Takeaways • SGP enriches our understanding of HSA data. • SGP highlights areas of interest, but does not provide a recommended course of action. • Models help us check our assumptions and biases. • New data only helps students if educators access and use it.

  49. SGP Timeline Roster Verification Drives Reporting and Evaluation Roster Verification Informs Research:What student-teacher attributions matter?

  50. Questions?

More Related