ce 510 hazardous waste engineering n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Download Presentation
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. CE 510Hazardous Waste Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Southern Illinois University Carbondale Instructor: Jemil Yesuf Dr. L.R. Chevalier Lecture Series 10: Hazardous Waste Risk Assessment

  2. Course Goals • Review the history and impact of environmental laws in the United States • Understand the terminology, nomenclature, and significance of properties of hazardous wastes and hazardous materials • Develop strategies to find information of nomenclature, transport and behavior, and toxicity for hazardous compounds • Elucidate procedures for describing, assessing, and sampling hazardous wastes at industrial facilities and contaminated sites • Predict the behavior of hazardous chemicals in surface impoundments, soils, groundwater and treatment systems • Assess the toxicity and risk associated with exposure to hazardous chemicals • Apply scientific principles and process designs of hazardous wastes management, remediation and treatment

  3. Risk Assessment • The ultimate goal is to provide a quantitative basis for making decisions involving • hazardous waste treatment • Remediation • Disposal options • Waste minimization • Siting new facilities (incinerators, Landfill) • Is a key part of CERCLA and SARA • See page 519 for two extremes of risk

  4. What is Risk? • Chance of encountering the potential adverse effects of human and ecological exposures to environmental hazards • Put simply; RISK = TOXICITY x EXPOSURE • Toxicity = contaminant’s ability to cause adversity • Exposure = The route to receptors and the concentration of the contaminant

  5. 4 Steps for Risk Assessment (EPA) • Hazardous Identification • What chemicals exist at the site and are of potential concern? • Exposure assessment • How might a receptor be exposed on or off site? • Toxicity Assessment • At what level of exposure are adverse effects likely to occur? – Receptor analysis • Risk Characterization • What are the risks and uncertainties at the site? – e.g. one in hundred, or one in one million

  6. Human Health Risk Assessment Data Collection and Evaluation Exposure Assessment Toxicity Assessment Risk Characterization

  7. Checklist for Human Health • What human receptors are near your site? • Are residential properties close by? • Is site access restricted? • What contaminants are present? • Is there a threat or demonstrated release? • What media have been impacted? • What data are available?

  8. Exposure Assessment • Identify and estimate concentrations of chemicals potentially affecting human health or ecological receptors • Characterize the site in terms of: • Physical characteristics • Soil characteristics, surface water location, groundwater (flow depth), meteorology • Exposed populations • Human activities and land use (recreation, residential/industrial/commercial) • Proximity to release • Potential future uses

  9. Identify exposure pathways • Develop a conceptual site model • Determine amount of exposure for each pathway using monitoring data or fate and transport models • Analyze concentrations, frequency and duration of contaminant exposure to population groups • Consider characteristics of affected population groups - age of individuals, age, unique exposure considerations, other factors

  10. Toxicity Assessment • Compare dose of contaminant with incidence of adverse human health effect to ascertain relationship (quantitative toxicology) • Determine whether exposure to certain chemicals results in adverse health effects • Evaluate available toxicity information • Databases - IRIS (EPA) • Identify data gaps • Investigate human health problems near the site

  11. Risk Characterization • Combine information gathered in the Exposure Assessment and Toxicity Assessment • Quantify risks to human health from individual chemicals and exposure pathways • Sum risks for various exposure scenarios • Evaluate cancer risk, non-cancer hazard separately (Eqns. 11.8 and 11.9 Textbook) • Describe all assumptions, areas of uncertainty

  12. Ecological Risk Assessment • RCRA and CERCLA requires EPA to remediate uncontrolled hazardous waste sites in a way that protect both human health and the ENVIRONMENT. • National Contingency Plan requires that the four steps be used for risk assessment to characterize the current and potential threats to both public health and the ENVIRONMENT.

  13. Ecological Risk Assessment Framework

  14. Effects on Ecosystem • Reduction in population size • Change in community structure • Changes in ecosystem structure and function

  15. Sources of Uncertainties • Source characterization • Lack of available data • Exposure assessment models and methods • Toxicology data

  16. Risk Assessment versus Risk Management • Risk assessment – unbiased scientific approach to assessing risk • Risk management – incorporates the results of risk assessment, factors in societal values, legal mandates, other considerations • Risk communication is a critical piece of each of these

  17. RiskManagement The process of weighing policy alternatives and selecting the most appropriate regulatory action by integrating the results of risk assessment with engineering data in addition to social, economic, and political concerns to reach a decision.

  18. Communicating Risk • Human response to risk is not always rational • Level of risk play little role in acceptability to public • Emotional response often makes it difficult to communicate risk • People apply personal values when evaluating risk

  19. Factors Affecting Risk Perception • Voluntary vs. Involuntary • Familiar vs. Unfamiliar • Visibility of Threat • Catastrophic vs. Non-catastrophic • Natural vs. Man-made • Affects Adults vs. Children • Trusted vs. Untrusted Communicator • Equal vs. Unequal Benefits

  20. Covello’s Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication • Accept and involve the public as a legitimate partner • Plan and carefully evaluate communication efforts • Identify audience, understand problems, pretest message • Listen to public’s specific concerns • Be honest, frank and open

  21. Cardinal Rules Continued • Coordinate and collaborate with other credible sources • Meet needs of media • Speak clearly and with compassion