1 / 12

Selection Process Design/Build Services for the Lake Eola Fountains Refurbishment June 7, 2 010

Selection Process Design/Build Services for the Lake Eola Fountains Refurbishment June 7, 2 010. Design/Build Selection Process. Governed by Section 133.2 of City Policies and Procedures and Chapter 287.055 of Florida Statutes (Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act).

moe
Download Presentation

Selection Process Design/Build Services for the Lake Eola Fountains Refurbishment June 7, 2 010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Selection Process Design/Build Services for the Lake Eola Fountains Refurbishment June 7, 2010

  2. Design/Build Selection Process • Governed by Section 133.2 of City Policies and Procedures and Chapter 287.055 of Florida Statutes (Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act). • Request for Proposals statement is issued by City, describing services being solicited. • Respondents submit a qualifications based proposal to City for review. Although construction cost estimate was included in solicitation, no pricing was requested as part of the proposal. • Statements are reviewed by a selection committee of five city staff members.

  3. Design/Build Selection Process • Selection is a qualifications based process – state law and City policy require staff to select the highest qualified firm or firms. • Highest qualified firm is determined through initial short-listing of proposals; short-listing is accomplished through a scoring matrix setting forth the selection criteria • Short-listed firms advance to oral interviews, then are ranked through use of a second scoring matrix. Note: the scoring and ranking from short-listing is not used in the final ranking determination.

  4. Design/Build Selection Process • Solicitation in question was for design/build services to refurbish the Lake Eola fountain • Selection committee consisted of: • Lisa Early, Director, Families, Parks, and Recreation Department • John Perrone, Parks Division Manager • Carline Aliotte, Contract Compliance Investigator I, MWBE Office • David Dunn, acting Facilities Division Manager • Richard Forbes, Planner III, City Planning • Steve Wiedenbeck served as non-voting chair and facilitator for the selection process

  5. Design/Build Selection Process • Solicitation was issued on February 14, 2010 to select a single firm to design and build the fountain improvements • City received 6 proposals on March 16, 2010 • The Consultants Qualification Board disqualified two of the proposers for failing to submit information regarding the design professional on their team • Selection committee met on March 24, 2010 to short list firms for the oral interview and decided on the following three firms: • Biscayne/ADE Joint Venture • Freeport Fountains, Inc. • Wesco Fountains

  6. Design/Build Selection Process • Short listed firms were interviewed on April 12, 2010 • Proposing teams were given 30 minutes to present their qualifications and approach to the refurbishment; the selection committee reserved 20 minutes for questions • Following interviews, selection committee scored each firm using the Evaluation Criteria form included in the RFP solicitation • Resulting ranking was: 1. Freeport Fountains, Inc. 2. Biscayne/ADE Joint Venture 3. Wesco Fountains

  7. Design/Build Selection Process Ranking Chart

  8. Appeal Process • A firm wishing to appeal the ranking must notify the Public Works Director • If the Public Works Director denies the appeal, the next step in the process is to appeal to the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) • If the CAO denies the appeal, the next step is a hearing before Council • The appellant will have 10 minutes to present the reasons for their appeal and state the action requested of Council • Staff will follow with a discussion of the appeal review conducted by the Public Works Director and Deputy CAO

  9. Actions Available to Council Upon conclusion of the hearing, council may: • Deny the appeal - Move to approve Agenda Item NB 3 • Uphold the appeal and remand to the selection committee with instructions - Do not approve Agenda Item NB 3 • Deny the appeal and cancel the current RFP process; staff will reissue an RFP to start a new selection process - Do not approve Agenda Item NB 3

  10. Questions?

More Related