1 / 20

THE ISING PHASE IN THE J1-J2 MODEL

THE ISING PHASE IN THE J1-J2 MODEL. Valeria Lante and Alberto Parola. {. the model motivation phase diagram. OUTLINE :. introduction to the model our aim analytical approach numerical approach Conclusions the future. non linear sigma model. Lanczos exact diagonalizations.

mizell
Download Presentation

THE ISING PHASE IN THE J1-J2 MODEL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE ISING PHASE IN THE J1-J2 MODEL Valeria Lante and Alberto Parola

  2. { the model motivation phase diagram OUTLINE: introduction to the model our aim analytical approach numerical approach Conclusions the future non linear sigma model Lanczos exact diagonalizations

  3. J1 J2 spin systems: symmetry breaking (magnetization) (no 1D for Mermin-Wagner theorem) T = 0 ? Can quantum fluctuations stabilize a disordered phase in spin systems at T=0 ? INTRODUCTION: What is the J1-J2model ? Why the J1-J2model ? relevance of low dimensionality relevance of small spin

  4. J1-J2model Frustration may enhance quantum fluctuations T=0 J2/J1 ~0.4 ~0.6 Néel phase Collinear phase Paramagnetic phase Simple quantum spin model: Heisenberg model (J2=0) < order parameter > ≠ 0 at T=0 in 2D

  5. Connection with high temperature superconductivity SC M ? AF T = 0  0.04 0.05 Holes moving in a spin disordered background (?) It is worth studying models with spin liquid phases J1-J2model Vanadate compounds Li2VOGeO4 Li2VOSiO4 VOMoO4

  6. { 1 i +  = i -1 i - z S { = classical (S→) GS ≠quantum { = 1 classical m /S s ~ 0.6 quantum (S=1/2) Some definitions SS Néel state i i i Stot 2D Heisenberg model at T=0 (J2=0)

  7. PHASE DIAGRAM OF THE J1-J2 MODEL

  8. S = e cos(q·r) + e sin(q·r) r 1 2 J2/J1 0.5 Classical (S) ground state (GS) at T=0 classical energy minimized by if J(q) is minimum J2/J1< 0.5: J(q) minimum at q=() J2/J1> 0.5:two independent AF sublattices * J2/J1= 0.5: J(q) minimum at q=(qx) and q=(qy) * thermal or quantum fluctuations select a collinear phase (CP) with q=(0) or q=()

  9. broken symmetries O(3) O(3) X Z 2 + m ≠ 0 s  = n · n≠ 0 - m ≠ 0 + s - m ≠ 0 s J2/J1 ~0.4 ~0.6 n  + L / S -n + L / S + + - - -n  + L / S n  + L / S + + - - Quantum ground state at T=0 < ~0.4 long range Néel ordered phase >~0.6 collinear order (Ref. 1). ~<~0.6 Magnetically disordered region (Ref. 1).

  10. = VBC: valence bond crystal RVB SL: resonating valence bond spin liquid VBC = regular pattern of singlets at nearest neighbours: dimers or plaquettes | RVB > =  A(C )|C > i i C dimer = 1/√2 ( |> -| i C = dimer covering i long-ranged dimer-dimer or plaquette-plaquette order no SU(2) symmetry breaking no long-ranged spin-spin correlations no long-ranged order no SU(2) symmetry breaking no long-ranged spin-spin correlations

  11. <  > = 0 < n > = 0 <  > ≠ 0 < n > ≠ 0 “disorder” collinear J2/J1 ~0.6 <  > = 0 < n > = 0 <  > ≠ 0 < n > = 0 <  > ≠ 0 < n > ≠ 0 “disorder” “Ising” collinear J2/J1 ? ~0.6 OUR AIM:

  12. Non Linear Sigma Model method for  =J2/J1 > 1/2 Haldane mapping 2+1 D Classical model at Teff ≠0 2D Quantum model at T=0 I. The partition function Z is written in a path integral representation on a coherent states basis. II. For each sublattice every spin state is written as the sum of a “Néel” field and the respective fluctuation. ANALITYCAL APPROACH :

  13.  = n · n - + III.In the continuum limit, to second order in space and time derivatives and to lowest order in 1/S, Z results:  = Ising order parameter

  14. static and homogeneous 0 saddle point approximation for large : n = n + n + + + - - - same results of spin wave theory Collinear long range ordered phase checks: classical limit (S →∞ )

  15. Lanczos diagonalizations: On the basis of the symmetries of the effective model, an intermediate phase with <n > = 0 and finite Ising order parameter <> ≠ 0 may exist. + - Analysis of the phase diagram for values of  around 0.6 for a 4X4 and a 6X6 cluster NUMERICAL APPROACH: It can be either a: VB nematic phase, where bonds display orientational ordering VBC ( translational symmetry breaking)

  16. ordered phases and respective degenerate states 4X4 { (0,0)s S=0 (0,0)d S=0 (0,) S=1 (,0) S=1 collinear { (0,0)s S=0 (0,0)d S=0 (0, ) S=0 (,0) S=0 columnar VBC 6X6 { (0,0)s S=0 (0) S=0 (0, ) S=0 (, ) S=0 plaquette VBC 0.60 :(0,0)s and (0,0)d singlets quasi degenerate → Z2 breaking 0.62 :(0, ) S=0 higher than (0, ) S=1 →no columnar VBC () S=0 higher than the others →no plaquette VBC 0.62 triplet states are gapped conclusions: Lowest energy states referenced to the GS

  17. Order Parameter 0.6 <<0.7: |s> and |d> quasi-degenerate s> + |d>)/√2 breaks Z2Ôr = Ŝr · Ŝr+y - Ŝr · Ŝr+x lim < Ôr > ≠ 0 and |s> and |d> degenerate (N →∞) Z2 symmetry breaking < Ôr > Px Py 0.60 : Py compatible with a disordered configuration 0.60 : Px Px for Heisenberg chains AsgrowsPy 0 : vertical tripletscollinear phase < Ôr > ≠ 0 conclusions:

  18. Structure factor S(k) = Fourier transform of the spin-spin correlation function = (0,0) M= (0,) X= (,) conclusions: S(k) on |s >  S(k) on |d >  same physics 0.70 : S(,0) grows with size collinear order 0.600.62 : S(k) flat + no size dependence 0.62<towards transition to collinear phase numerical data fitted by a SW function except at single points Blue (cyan) triangles: S(k) on the lowest s-wave (d-wave) singlet for a 4x4 cluster. Red (green) dots: The same for a 6x6 cluster.

  19. CONCLUSIONS: From the symmetries of the non linear sigma model: • At T=0 possibility of : disorder Ising collinear The Lanczos diagonalizations at T = 0 • Ising phase for ? < < 0.62 •  ~ 0.60: collection of spin chains weakly coupled in the transverse direction. <  > = 0 < n > = 0 <  > ≠ 0 < n > = 0 <  > ≠ 0 < n > ≠ 0 disorder Ising collinear ? 0.62 ISING PHASE = VB nematic phase

  20. About the J1-J2 model on square lattice Monte Carlo simulation of the NLSM action Numerical analysis (LD) of the phase: looking for a chiral phase:Ŝr · (Ŝr+y Ŝr+x) About the J1-J2 model on a two chain ladder Numerical analysis (LD) of the phase diagram “novel” phase diagram proposed by Starykh and Balents PRL (2004) THE FUTURE:

More Related