180 likes | 264 Views
Develop a 10-year finance plan, create funding targets, financing options, and engage stakeholders for sustainable water management in the California Bay-Delta Program. Discuss benefits, beneficiaries, cost allocation, and finance tools. Explore a new water user fee approach for equitable funding distribution.
E N D
Need for Finance Planning • Status quo approach to rely so heavily on State bond funds unlikely in the future • Existing funding significantly declining • Legislative direction on new water user fee • Benefits-based financing principle in ROD • Avoid piecemeal finance planning
Finance PlanningReports Finance Options Report • Expand understanding of benefits and costs • Develop financing options Ten Year Finance Plan • Develop specific funding targets • ID unmet needs • ID financing strategy
Finance PlanningReports Draft Finance Options Report provides Foundation for 10 year plan discussion: • Annual funding targets for each element and task/project • Schedule and readiness of projects • Potential benefits and beneficiaries • Possible finance strategies for each element and task/project
Finance Planning Outreach • Stakeholder and agency workgroups & informal meetings • Legislative hearings & meetings • Public meetings and workshops • Independent Review Panel • 8 member panel of academics and practitioners
Analysis For Developing Finance Plan • What are the reasonable funding needs/targets? • What are the benefits? • Who are the beneficiaries? • How should costs be allocated? • What are the finance tools?
What are the Benefits? • Water supply (yield & reliability) • Drinking Water Quality • Ecosystem Improvement • Flood Protection • Hydropower • Recreation
Measuring “Economic” Benefits • More Easily Measured: Water supply, water quality and flood protection • More Difficult to Measure: ecosystem improvements
Finance Tools For the Public Share • State General Obligation Bonds • General Funds • Federal appropriations For the User Share • Self Liquidating GO Bonds • State Revenue Bonds • SWP & CVP contractor charges • JPA Revenue Bonds • Local matching contributions • New State Administered Fees
New State Administered Fees Fee versus Tax: • Need a Nexus between level of benefits and amount paid in fees • Each program in CALFED has different set of beneficiaries that would result in varying fee levels among water users
New Benefits Based Water User Fee Finance Options Report suggests that a water user fee is best suited to programs with diffuse water user benefits & not able to identify individual beneficiaries such as: • Ecosystem Restoration • Environmental Water Account • Drinking Water Quality • Delta Levees • Watershed
Surface Storage Construction Groundwater Storage WUE (Conservation, Recycling, & Desalination) Ecosystem Restoration Program Example Finance Strategies Financing negotiated project by project based on willing beneficiaries GW and WUE Grant Programs – Primarily local funding, Public share for broader statewide benefits • Public share - Future State bonds & Fed appropriations, • Water User share - fee possible, • Local cost shares
10 Year Finance PlanNext Steps Before mid-October • Refine funding targets and available funds • Develop proposed cost sharing plan • Continue outreach with agencies and stakeholders
Finance Planning Issues /Challenges • Measuring or understanding benefits to support cost sharing • Philosophical differences--property right vs. public trust • Ensuring balance & linkages across Programs • Large gap, no easy money, numerous interest groups & timeframe condensed