1 / 10

Sida’s Humanitarian Work

Sida’s Humanitarian Work. Sida’s Strategy for Humanitarian Work 2008-2010. Based on the Government’s Humanitarian Policy (2005). Aim: Save lives, alleviate suffering and maintain human dignity.

mingan
Download Presentation

Sida’s Humanitarian Work

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sida’s Humanitarian Work

  2. Sida’s Strategy for Humanitarian Work 2008-2010 • Based on the Government’s Humanitarian Policy (2005). • Aim: Save lives, alleviate suffering and maintain human dignity. • Guided by international law and humanitarian principles (humanity, independence, impartiality and neutrality). • Stresses GHD (quick, predictable, flexible, needs-based). • Projects through the UN, Red Cross, NGOs and relevant authorities. • Appropriation can be used for Disaster Preparedness and should support transition to recovery and longer-term development. • Promote the international humanitarian system through contributions to research, method development and capacity development (secondments). • Assist the MFA in advancing the development of international humanitarian policy.

  3. The Humanitarian Team Policy Specialist Human Security Controller ATHA Project Leader • 15 persons • 16 languages • 77 years of field experience • From the Red Cross, UN, NGOs, private sector…

  4. Swedish Humanitarian Assistance GREENLAND ALASKA (USA) SWEDEN ICELAND RUSSIAN FEDERATION FINLAND NORWAY CANADA ESTONIA LATVIA DENMARK LITHUANIA BELARUS REPULIC OFIRELAND UNITEDKINGDOM NETHERLANDS GERMANY POLAND BELGIUM CZECHREPUBLIC UKRAINE KAZAKHSTAN SLOVAKIA AUSTRIA MONGOLIA HUNGARY SWITZ. FRANCE ROMANIA ITALY UZBEKISTAN BULGARIA GEORGIA GEORGIA KYRGYZSTAN SPAIN NORTHKOREA PORTUGAL UNITED STATES of AMERICA GREECE TURKEY TURKMENISTAN TAHKISTAN CHINA SOUTHKOREA JAPAN SYRIA AFGHANISTAN IRAN IRAQ TUNISIA MOROCCO PAKISTAN ALGERIA NEPAL LIBYA EGYPT WESTERN SAHARA SAUDIARABIA MEXICO TAIWAN UAE INDIA OMAN VIETNAM MYANMAR CUBA MAURITANIA LAOS MALI NIGER CHAD THAILAND SUDAN YEMEN GUATEMALA HONDURAS SENEGAL PHILIPPINES NICARAGUA CAMBODIA BURKINA GUINEA NIGERIA COSTA RICA ETHIOPIA VENEZUELA GHANA PANAMA SRILANKA COTED’IVOIRE CENTRALAFRICAN REPUBLIC LIBERIA GUYANA CAMEROON FRENCHGUIANA MALAYSIA COLOMBIA SURINAME SOMALIA UGANDA KENYA CONGO GABON ECUADOR DEMOCRATICREPUBLIC OFCONGO TANZANIA PAPUANEW GUINEA INDONESIA BRAZIL PERU ANGOLA ZAMBIA BOLIVIA MOZAMBIQUE MADAGASCAR ZIMBABWE NAMIBIA BOTSWANA PARAGUAY AUSTRALIA REPUBLICOF SOUTHAFRICA URUGUAY CHILE ARGENTINA • Countries with humanitarian projects 2007 • Sida field presence • SIda field presence with humanitarian profile NEWZEALAND

  5. Geographical division GREENLAND ALASKA (USA) SWEDEN ICELAND RUSSIAN FEDERATION FINLAND NORWAY CANADA ESTONIA LATVIA DENMARK LITHUANIA BELARUS REPULIC OFIRELAND UNITEDKINGDOM NETHERLANDS GERMANY POLAND BELGIUM CZECHREPUBLIC UKRAINE KAZAKHSTAN SLOVAKIA AUSTRIA MONGOLIA HUNGARY SWITZ. FRANCE ROMANIA ITALY UZBEKISTAN BULGARIA GEORGIA GEORGIA KYRGYZSTAN SPAIN NORTHKOREA PORTUGAL UNITED STATES of AMERICA GREECE TURKEY TURKMENISTAN TAHKISTAN CHINA SOUTHKOREA JAPAN SYRIA AFGHANISTAN IRAN IRAQ TUNISIA MOROCCO PAKISTAN ALGERIA NEPAL LIBYA EGYPT WESTERN SAHARA SAUDIARABIA MEXICO TAIWAN UAE INDIA OMAN VIETNAM MYANMAR CUBA MAURITANIA LAOS MALI NIGER CHAD THAILAND SUDAN YEMEN GUATEMALA HONDURAS SENEGAL PHILIPPINES NICARAGUA CAMBODIA BURKINA GUINEA NIGERIA COSTA RICA ETHIOPIA VENEZUELA GHANA PANAMA SRILANKA COTED’IVOIRE CENTRALAFRICAN REPUBLIC LIBERIA GUYANA CAMEROON FRENCHGUIANA MALAYSIA COLOMBIA SURINAME SOMALIA UGANDA KENYA CONGO GABON ECUADOR DEMOCRATICREPUBLIC OFCONGO TANZANIA PAPUANEW GUINEA INDONESIA BRAZIL PERU ANGOLA ZAMBIA BOLIVIA MOZAMBIQUE MADAGASCAR ZIMBABWE NAMIBIA BOTSWANA PARAGUAY AUSTRALIA REPUBLICOF SOUTHAFRICA Sudan: 251 645 000 (12%) DRC: 171 368 000 (8%) oPt: 128 796 000 (6%) Somalia: 115 368 000 (6%) Uganda: 105 275 000 (5%) URUGUAY CHILE ARGENTINA NEWZEALAND

  6. Allocations 2001 – 2008 (MSEK) Year AllocationDisbursed 2001 1 077 1 306 2002 930 1 222 2003 1 100 1 262 2004 1 530 1 610 2005 1 942 1 877 2006 1 970 2 012 2007 2 045 2 064 2008 2 010

  7. 10 largest partner organisations 2007

  8. Våra uppdrag • Sida’s humanitarian support – separate allocation • CAP – Flash Appeals • Red Cross – Minor hum. frames • SRSA – Single projects • Early recovery with delegated funds • Disaster Risk Reduction and prevention • Counselling in humanitarian affairs

  9. Humanitarian Policy Sida humanitarian strategy Fast, predictable, flexible, needs-based Guiding Principles Good Humanitarian Donorship Save lives, reduce suffering, maintain dignity. Humain, impartial, neutral and independent. Non-political assistance in politicised environment. Based on needs, no concentration to countries. Sida presence in fewer countries requires new methods.

  10. The Humanitarian VIsion Competence Strengthen the Swedish humanitarian competence through strategic recruitment, secondment and training. + Capacity Increase Sweden’s joint humanitarian capacity through strengthening humanitarian competence in the field. + Effectiveness Quick and competens processing of humanitarian projects, i e no reduction of capacity at HQ in Sweden. = • Ascertaining the quality of Swedish humanitarian assistance through: • Knowledge and understanding • Presence and follow-up • Speed and predictability Quality

More Related