ss28 cooperative systems ii bits bytes and brakes n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
SS28: Cooperative Systems II: Bits, Bytes, and Brakes PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
SS28: Cooperative Systems II: Bits, Bytes, and Brakes

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 8

SS28: Cooperative Systems II: Bits, Bytes, and Brakes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

International Harmonization of Cooperative Systems Development. SS28: Cooperative Systems II: Bits, Bytes, and Brakes . Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office. Background.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'SS28: Cooperative Systems II: Bits, Bytes, and Brakes' - min

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
ss28 cooperative systems ii bits bytes and brakes

International Harmonization of Cooperative Systems Development

SS28: Cooperative Systems II: Bits, Bytes, and Brakes

Mike Schagrin

US Department of Transportation

ITS Joint Program Office

  • USDOT and the European Commission Directorate General for Information Society and Media (DGINFSO) entered into a bilateral Implementing Arrangement in January 2009
  • Establish a technology roadmap for cooperative safety
  • Established collaborative work activities:
      • Applications
      • Assessment Tools
      • Driver Distraction
      • Standards
      • Terminology
  • Formal joint meetings:
      • Stockholm, Sweden (October 2009)
      • Washington, DC (Jan 2010)
      • Brussels, Belgium (planned for June 2010)
applications working group
Applications Working Group
  • Objectives:
    • Identify & define 2 cooperative applications (one V2V, one V2I) for collaboration
    • Define technical solutions to common critical technology issues (e.g., security, positioning, communications, facilities)
  • Accomplishments:
    • Preliminary definitions for three V2V and three V2I Applications
    • Two applications recommended for further development
      • V2V: Forward Collision Avoidance.
      • V2I: Stop Sign/Signal Violation Warning.
    • Recommendation to identify one Environment/Sustainability Application
  • Next Steps:
    • Exchange existing technical information (e.g. Con Ops, Systems Engineering)
    • Identify functional and performance requirements for each application
    • Identify key technical elements for harmonization of three applications areas
    • Define scope of sustainability application
assessment tools working group
Assessment Tools Working Group
  • Objectives:
    • Establish the foundation to facilitate a common level of analysis capabilities, comparison of Field Operational Tests, and exchange of data and information.
  • Accomplishments:
    • Three coordination areas identified:
      • Assessment Tools: share models, simulation, and analysis tools
      • Field Operational Test Methodology and Design: identify standard practices
      • Data Formats and Parameters: identify key parameters and a common format to support data exchange
  • Next Steps:
        • Identify and characterize different assessment tools
        • Identify basic FOT design and common methodology
        • Identify common format and parameters to support data exchange
driver distraction working group
Driver Distraction Working Group
  • Objectives:
    • Establish common definition, metrics
    • Provide a platform for collaborations by which to collect/share data
  • Accomplishments:
    • Meeting in Berlin with six leading experts on distraction (3 from US, Europe)
      • Established common definition of “driver distraction”
      • Identified top research needs (e.g., better estimates of risk of distracting tasks, implications for different mode operators)
  • Next Steps:
    • Identify opportunities for collaboration and synergy by compiling a list of relevant activities (the NHTSA Distraction Plan, issued in April 2010, will facilitate these discussions)
    • Define methodology in terms of techniques to measure distraction, so that studies can be more comparable
standards working group
Standards Working Group
  • Objectives:
    • Explore opportunities for harmonizing ITS standards internationally.
      • Support, wherever possible, global open standards in order to ensure interoperability of cooperative systems worldwide and to preclude the development and adoption of redundant standards.
  • Accomplishments:
    • Draft Harmonization Opportunity Assessment Plan (HOAP)
        • Track 1: Assessment and Recommendations
        • Track 2: Detailed Agreement for Harmonization Procedures
        • Track 3: Gap/Overlap Analysis for Future Standards
  • Next Steps:
    • Finalizing HOAP
    • Exploring Document Sharing
terminology task
Terminology Task
  • Objectives:
      • Establish common working definition for key terms and concepts
  • Accomplishments:
    • Draft document crafted and vetting through collaborative group
  • Next Steps:
      • Publish Terminology Document on ITS website
      • Invite external persons to contribute to Terminology Document
  • We are making process; still in the start up phase
  • Different funding models
  • Alignment of priorities
  • Membership representation on task forces