Complaints and quality:  myth and reality                   in New Zealand
Download
1 / 33

Complaints and quality: myth and reality in New Zealand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 84 Views
  • Uploaded on

Complaints and quality: myth and reality in New Zealand. NZIHM Conference Wellington, 1 July Nicola Sladden, Chief Legal Advisor Health and Disability Commissioner. Overview. Setting the scene Incidence of claims/complaints Complainant motives

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Complaints and quality: myth and reality in New Zealand' - min


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

Complaints and quality: myth and reality in New Zealand

NZIHM Conference

Wellington, 1 July

Nicola Sladden, Chief Legal Advisor

Health and Disability Commissioner


Overview
Overview in New Zealand

  • Setting the scene

  • Incidence of claims/complaints

  • Complainant motives

  • Complaints and quality of care


Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

Injured/Unhappy in New Zealandpatient

Claim

Complaint

Accident

Compensation

Corporation

Health care

provider

Health and Disability

Commissioner

Compensation

Complaint

resolution

Professional

discipline

Competence

review

MALPRACTICE LITIGATION


Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

New South Wales, Australia in New Zealand

“[Doctors] now work in an increasingly hostile medico-legal environment. New South Wales is reputed to have one of the highest rates of medical negligence litigation in the world.”

- Editorial, Critical Care and Resuscitation

Image: www.worldcountries.info


Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

United Kingdom in New Zealand

The tidal wave of litigation crashing against the shores of the NHS threatens a crisis. … Dr Panting [of MPS] maintains that the situation is dire. "We are looking at a looming crisis of proportions that will make the flu epidemic seem like a drop in the ocean," he said.

- BBC News, Litigation Next NHS Crisis, 2000

Image: ww.worldcountries.info


Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

Florida, United States in New Zealand

“[Florida’s medical malpractice legislation has] crippled the health care system and left patients, payers, and providers considerably worse off than before. These conditions have, undoubtedly, created the most hostile professional and clinical conditions observed in the US, while fomenting a major social and political crisis.”

- Paul Barach, AHRQ

Image: www.worldcountries.info


Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

New Zealand in New Zealand

“New Zealand continues to be one of the most hostile medico-legal environments in any of the places in which MPS operates ...”

– Medical Protection Society


Overview1
Overview in New Zealand

  • Setting the scene

  • Incidence of claims/complaints

  • Complainant motives

  • Complaints and quality of care


Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

A “high incidence” of complaints? in New Zealand

1 in 3 doctors in NZ subject to complaint during career

1 in 17 doctors in NZ can expect to receive a complaint each year

This has been described as a “high incidence” of complaints.

Cunningham, 2003


Complaint rates are low
“Complaint rates are low” in New Zealand

Only 3 of 850 adverse events (found in Davis (PHCS review of 6579 1998 public hospital records) surface in complaints to HDC — 1 in 200

“Complaints are rare … the vast majority of preventable adverse events never trigger one”

Bismark et al, 2006


Claims complaints tip of iceberg in nz
Claims & complaints in New Zealandtip of iceberg in NZ

  • Fewer than 5% of eligible patients claimed ACC compensation

  • Among patients who suffered serious preventable injuries only1 in 25 complained to HDC

    Bismark et al, 2006


Disparities in complaints to hdc
Disparities in complaints in New Zealandto HDC

  • The most socioeconomically deprived patients are 1/3 as likely to complain as most privileged

  • Elderly (65+) are 1/5 less likely to complain as those aged 18 to 44

  • Pacific patients are 1/3 less likely to complain as non-Maori/non-Pacific patients

    (similar trend for Maori, but not statistically significant – ethnicity not recorded on many files)

    Bismark et al, 2006


Overview2
Overview in New Zealand

  • Setting the scene

  • Incidence of claims/complaints

  • Complainant motives

  • Complaints and quality of care


Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

It’s not just about the money in New Zealand

Bismark et al, 2006;

Hickson et al, JAMA 1992


I want lessons to be learnt
“I want lessons to be learnt” in New Zealand

“Surgeons should not be overworked to the point of mistakes. I hope those involved have been able to learn from this and can thus prevent a mistake which could result in loss of life.”

(breast cancer survivor whose breast prosthesis was punctured by surgeon who mistook it for a fluid collection)


Illegitimate complaints
Illegitimate complaints in New Zealand

HDC has power to take no action on a complaint considered to be trivial, frivolous, vexatious or not made in good faith

s 38 HDC Act

In practice, fewer than 1 in 100 complaints are vexatious — though often vexing for the provider.


Complaints are made for a reason
Complaints are made in New Zealandfor a reason

  • 64% of complaints to HDC (re public hospital admission in 1998) involved an adverse event

  • 51% of adverse events were judged preventable

    Bismark, 2006

  • Yet only 6% of complaints to HDC result in breach finding.

    (HDC Annual Report 2005)


Overview3
Overview in New Zealand

  • Setting the scene

  • Incidence of claims/complaints

  • Complainant motives

  • Complaints and quality of care


Harmful to patient care
Harmful to patient care? in New Zealand

“As a society, we believe that by making complaints we’re going to improve the delivery of health care. In fact, there is an increasing wealth of evidence to show doctors practise worse.”

Cunningham, 2006


Distrustful doctors
Distrustful doctors in New Zealand

  • 1 in 3 respondent doctors lost trust, goodwill and commitment to patients.

    Cunningham, 2004

  • 38% of respondent surgical trainees felt complaint had negative effect on future doctor-patient relationships.

    Jarvis et al, 2006


Defensive medicine
Defensive medicine in New Zealand

  • 85% of respondent NZ surgical trainees reported that complaint made them practise more defensively

    Jarvis et al, 2006

  • 93% of respondent US physicians reported that litigation made them practise more defensively.

    Studdert et al, 2005


Defending the patient
Defending the patient in New Zealand

  • ‘Negative’ defensive medicine is harmful if high risk patients cannot get necessary care — but beneficial, if risky doctors restrict practice or retire.

  • ‘Positive’ defensive medicine is harmful if it results in unnecessary tests and procedures — but beneficial, if patients receive appropriate standard of care.


The purpose of investigating patient complaints
The purpose of investigating patient complaints in New Zealand

  • Individual resolution

    Resolution, not retribution

  • Improvement in health care safety

    and quality

    Learning, not lynching

  • Public protection

    Watchdog role


Case study medication error
Case study – medication error in New Zealand

  • 91-year-old Eileen Anderson referred to PNH by GP with chest infection

  • Mrs A’s bradma label incorrectly placed on another patient’s drug chart

  • Mrs A’s own pack of medicines lost

  • Mrs A given wrong drugs (including morphine sulphate) for 4 days

  • No nurses or doctors detected the error even though Mrs A became more and more drowsy and confused.


Case study medication error1
Case study – medication error in New Zealand

  • Day 4 – error detected by house surgeon

  • Consultant not told

  • Family not told for another 3 days

  • Mrs A died 2 weeks later

  • Family not called to be with mother during last few hours, even though staff realised she was dying


Family s response
Family’s response in New Zealand

Mrs A’s daughter reported “a total loss of confidence in PNH. A distrust of becoming a patient there, sufficient to lead me to sell my home and relocate. Guilt – for taking my mother to PNH in the first place … guilt for all she suffered, and her death.”


Staff response
Staff response in New Zealand

“I was devastated.” ED registrar

“Working conditions for medical registrars at PNH were exceptionally difficult.” Medical registrar

“Continuity of care in NZ hospitals especially over weekends is often not possible, because of frequent changes of general staff, and these times call for overall vigilance. I will never forget Mrs Anderson.” Consultant


Dhb response
DHB response in New Zealand

Recruitment and staff issue addressed

Education programmes enhanced

Handover processes improved

Access to/review of drug charts standardised

Swipe card system for ward dispensaries – all Drs have access

Patient details in long hand on chart before label affixed


National response
National response in New Zealand

  • HDC report sent to DHBNZ Safe and Quality Use of Medicines Group

  • HDC report prompted medication safety audits and improvements in hospitals nationwide eg, Auckland DHB


Conclusions
Conclusions in New Zealand

  • Need to remain mindful of the “rest of the iceberg” – most adverse events never come to the attention of ACC and HDC

  • ACC claims and HDC complaints offer a valuable “window” on serious threats to patient safety

  • NZ system offers potential to link dispute resolution with improvements in patient safety.


Complaints and quality myth and reality in new zealand

www.hdc.org.nz in New Zealand