1 / 21

Chapter 3 Valuing the Environment: Methods

Chapter 3 Valuing the Environment: Methods. Environmental Economics and Policy Sixth Edition By Tom Tietenberg and Lynne Lewis. Risk Assessment ( Human-centered). Purpose is to determine if a substance is harmful and at what degree of exposure or concentration

micheleb
Download Presentation

Chapter 3 Valuing the Environment: Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 3Valuing the Environment: Methods Environmental Economics and Policy Sixth Edition By Tom Tietenberg and Lynne Lewis

  2. Risk Assessment (Human-centered) • Purpose is to determine if a substance is harmful and at what degree of exposure or concentration • Distinguishes between toxicity, hazard and risk • Hazard identification; dose-response assessment; exposure assessment; finally, overall risk characterization

  3. Valuing benefits and costs from pollution/pollution control Types of Values: • Use Value • Option Value • Nonuse Value

  4. Use Value • reflects willingness to pay for direct use of the environmental resource • can be active use (consumptive) or passive use (nonconsumptive) • requires one of the senses

  5. Option Value • willingness to pay for the future ability to use the environment • value people place on having the option to use or ensuring something exists for potential future use

  6. Nonuse values • willingness to pay to preserve a resource that one will never directly use • pure nonuse values are called existencevalues • less tangible, but can be quite large

  7. TABLE 3.1 Economic Methods for Measuring Environmental and Resource Values

  8. Direct Revealed Preference Methods • based on actual observable choices and/or goods that have market prices • Loss in value can be calculated easily if prices are directly observable.

  9. Direct Stated Preferences Methods • uses surveys to elicit willingness to pay • contingent valuation:respondentsare asked what value they would place on some level of environmental change

  10. Indirect Observable Methods: utilize surrogate markets • Travel-cost methods infer values of resources by determining how much visitors spend getting to a site • Hedonic property value & hedonic wage approachesinfer environmental values from spending on goods that include those values • Avoidance or defensive expendituresinfer values from expenditures necessary to take action to reduce damage

  11. Indirect Hypothetical Methods • typically give respondents a set of hypothetical situations to rank order • Contingent ranking: respondents evaluate bundles of goods with different environmental amenities • Conjoint analysis& choice experiments present respondents with bundles of attributes from which to choose

  12. TABLE 3.2Attributes in the Maine Forest Harvesting Conjoint Analysis

  13. TABLE 3.3 A Sample Conjoint Analysis Survey Question

  14. TABLE 3.4 The Cost of Risk-Reducing Regulations

  15. Valuing Human Life • focuses on calculating changes in the probability of death resulting from a reduction in some environmental risk and then placing a value on that • “implied value of human life” • divide the amount each person is willing to pay for a certain reduction in the probability of death by the probability of the reduction

  16. Example • willing to pay $500,000 for a 10% reduction in probability of death • implied value of life: $500,000 / 0.10 = $5,000,000

  17. Value of Life Estimates • 1996 survey found values $3 to $7 M, or $4.5 to $10.4 in 2013 dollars • Q: If this survey were done in Haiti, what would the value be? • Discuss the implications of this mental exercise.

  18. Choosing the Discount Rate for CBA (Cost-Benefit Analysis) • Seen as the social opportunity cost of capital, with two components: the risk free rate, and the risk premium • Rate on long-term government bonds is a common choice • Based on high degree of pure uncertainty: is it legitimate to make important environmental decisions in this manner?

  19. Variations in Discount Rate • will depend on the nature and expected lifetime of the project, who is doing the financing and the level of risk • power of the discount rate to sway a decision one way or another is considerable • sensitivity analysis can be performed

  20. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis • alternative used when CBA is impossible or infeasible • involves minimization of costs of achieving a policy target (such as an emissions standard) • minimum-cost solution: equalization of the marginal costs of all possible alternatives (second equimarginal principle)

  21. Impact Analysis • Environmental or economic (or both) impact statements attempt to quantify consequences of an action • Can be used to present info and data when CBA and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) unavailable • Sometimes include CBA or CEA

More Related