1 / 11

Social Dialogue in Times of Crisis: Intersectoral Agreement on Short-time Working in Austria

This conference presentation discusses the role of social partners in tackling the economic crisis in Austria through an intersectoral agreement on short-time working schemes. It explores the signs of the crisis, the outcomes of the agreement, and the development of economic growth and unemployment during this period.

michaelae
Download Presentation

Social Dialogue in Times of Crisis: Intersectoral Agreement on Short-time Working in Austria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EUROFOUND Conference „Studies on the EU and other Global Economies: The Role of Social Partners in Tackling the Crisis, 1 December 2011 Social dialogue in times of crisis: Intersectoral social partner agreement on short-time working schemes in Austria Bernadette Allinger FORBA (Working Life Research Centre, Austria)

  2. Overview • Signs of the crisis in Austria – economic and labour market data • Social dialogue during the crisis: Social partner agreement on short-time work (STW) • Outcomes

  3. Signs of the crisis in Austria • Pre-crisis situation in Austria: lowest unemployment rate since 2000 with 5.8% (national calculation), GDP growth in 2007 at 3.7%, in 2008 still at 2.2% • Austria was hit by the crisis in autumn 2008, intensified by mid-2009; GDP decreased by 3.6% in 2009; Exports fell by 20% in 2009 • Unemployment rate increased by 22.6 percentage points (48,100 persons) to 7.2% from 2008 to 2009 • Employment groups concerned most: males, youth, migrants and lowly qualified

  4. Development of economic growth (Source: Eurostat)

  5. Development of unemployment(Sources: Eurostat, Statistik Austria) Quelle Eurostat

  6. Short-time working schemes I Negotiations took place at three levels: • tripartite national level: improvement of framework conditions (extension from 12 to 18, then 24 months; combination of STW+qualification; increase of STW allowance for employers from 7th month onwards) – very good negotiating atmosphere • bipartite cross-sectoral level: framework agreement (90% replacement ratio) – good negotiating atmosphere • bipartite company level – partly controversial negotiating atmosphere

  7. Short-time working schemes II Provisions of the STW scheme: • Any employer in private sector can make use of STW schemes if: temporarily affected by unforeseeable economic problems which are not due to seasonal variation • PES to be informed six weeks prior to envisaged introduction of the scheme • Reduction of working hours must not go below 10% or over 90% of the standard working hours • Employees’ wage losses due to reduced working hours are (partly) compensated by means of a STW allowance (Kurzarbeitsbeihilfe) or a further training allowance (Beihilfe zur Qualifizierung, 15% higher)

  8. Short-time working schemes III Conflicts at cross-sectoral level: • Employers tried to sideline trade unions’ consent to company-level implementation process (like in Germany) – not successful • Wages to be paid: PES 55%, employers to cover gap (workers to receive at least 90% of former income – excl. SMEs) • Retention period shortened at employers’ demand

  9. Short-time work take up Source: Federal Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Consumer Protection (BMASK)

  10. Outcomes • Between 80,000 and 90,000 jobs were saved during the crisis, of which varying estimates say that between 10-30% can be attributed to STW • STW as cost effective measure: one unemployed person costs as much as three persons on STW • No mass redundancies • Growth in unemployment significantly lacked behind the contraction of the GDP • Temporary agency work went up immediately after crisis (after a decrease with onset of crisis) • Lowly qualified workers hit particularly hard – made redundant first

  11. Thank you!

More Related