EMA SIG Brighton 18th June 2013
Download
1 / 10

EMA SIG Brighton 18th June 2013 Policies , mechanisms and systems Simon Starr and Su Westerman - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 106 Views
  • Uploaded on

EMA SIG Brighton 18th June 2013 Policies , mechanisms and systems Simon Starr and Su Westerman Canterbury Christ Church University. Current use of EAM. Practice Institution-wide e-submission requirement for plagiarism prevention

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'EMA SIG Brighton 18th June 2013 Policies , mechanisms and systems Simon Starr and Su Westerman' - micah


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript


  • Practice

  • Institution-wide e-submissionrequirement for plagiarism prevention

  • E-feedback individual-led with some dept/programme-wide use

    • drivers: students/NSS, efficiency, pedagogy (sometimes!)

    • growing: 8% of all e-submissions 12/13

  • Little on-screen marking

  • Turnitin main (supported) system with some use of VLE (Bb)

  • Evaluation

  • Students value flexibility and clarity of feedback

  • Faster turnaround

  • Staff divided on ease of use, effort and quality of feedback; on-screen marking unpopular

Canterbury Christ Church University


  • Staff reluctance to mark on-screen (inc. being tied to PC, physical discomfort)

    • more willing to e-feedback if have paper copy to review

  • Lack University policy and guidance (inc. consistency of use, supported systems, Health & Safety, system down-time/blocked accounts, secure archiving, external examiners access)

  • Limited functionality of Turnitin (file types, group work, second marking, extensions)

    • VLE (Bb) functionality improving all the time but still need a copy to be submitted to Turnitin for originality checking …

  • Pressure for integration with other systems (e.g. automatically share grades with SRS, auto-archiving of work and feedback, enable a single submission if using Turnitin for originality checking and VLE for e-feedback)

  • See hand-out for detailed discussion

Canterbury Christ Church University


  • Recognise need for joined up University strategy

  • Recommendations to Learning, Teaching and Assessment Committee May 2013: policy, printing, systems development

  • EAM working groupinitial thoughts:

  • University definition of EAM

  • Promote aims of group and reassure staff

  • Review business processes and requirements

  • Develop guidance and/or policy

  • Consider printing logisitics

  • Look at systems

  • Likely long timescale but can we develop quick wins

Canterbury Christ Church University


  • We’d like to hear your thoughts on ways forward – so we would like to ask some straw poll questions

Canterbury Christ Church University


Straw poll:

How many here are either requiring or prepared to support widespread use of on-screen marking?

Canterbury Christ Church University


What are your experiences/challenges/solutions of organising hard copy for marking?

Canterbury Christ Church University


What system/s do you envisage supporting in the future?

Canterbury Christ Church University


Any comments/suggestions on our approach to developing strategy?

Canterbury Christ Church University


Canterbury Christ Church University


ad