1 / 9

Lessons Learned in Land Administration: European and Australian Perspectives

Join us for a discussion on the key lessons learned in land administration from the European and Australian perspectives. Explore the challenges, opportunities, and future steps in creating sustainable land administration models.

mforster
Download Presentation

Lessons Learned in Land Administration: European and Australian Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Day: Friday 11th November • Session: 9.00 - 12.30 • Coordinators: Warwick Watkins & Holger Magel • Topic: Generic Lessons Learnt- break out groups

  2. Welcome & Research Vision Presentations - European Perspective of Paradigm Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Steve Jacoby European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Paul van der Molen Evaluate – Components of the vision Report Back - DiscussionEuropean Lessons Learnt Day 1 – Wednesday Nov 9th

  3. Presentations - Australian Perspective of Paradigm Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Grahame Searle European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Daniel Steudler Evaluate – Components of the vision Report Back - DiscussionAustralian Lessons Learnt Day 2 – Thursday Nov 10th

  4. Day 3 – Friday Nov 11th Presentation – Spatially Enabling Government Evaluate – Issues in Designing a New Generation of LAS Group 1 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Warwick Watkins Group 2 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Holger Magel Report Back - Discussion Final Presentation Next Generation of LAS Ian Williamson, Stig Enemark, Jude Wallace

  5. Friday Discussion • Key lessons learned from the workshop • Use of comparisons between Europe and Australia • Future steps…

  6. Key lessons learned from the workshop • Eminent people are still capable • ICT based LAS does not automatically lead to sustainability • Historical issues impede • Cultural issues impede • Sustainability is brought about by a mix of factors, LAS is only one • The model/paradigm is technically driven NOT driven by sustainability • Other discipline need to be included • Lack of interoperability/common understanding impedes debate – legal, inter-community, technical, semantics • Branding/Marketing issues of the term “land administration”- politically appealing language is required • A connection to people is missing- dehumanized • The model does not have enough focus on economic benefits of the individuals • Active partners are required in the community e.g. farmers, Grossly over legislated (523 Victorian statutes) in Australia • More visionary model is required- proactive vs. reflecting what is

  7. Key lessons learned from the workshop • Local government and local communities should play a larger role • Rural areas are a greater problem (in Australia)? • Regulatory voids • Does this approach help in daily activities? • Need for definition of responsibilities • Are they cultural rather than legislated • Can we have a conceptual model that resonates across cultures • The role of the private sector? • How can they be embedded into the model/paradigm • Do they have a role if they’re only economically driven • The role of surveying in delivering sustainable development • Leading role vs. Supporting role • Model is primarily for understanding the process and therefore marketing

  8. Use of comparison between Europe and Australia • Very useful for understanding differences exist and why the exist • European approach to land is much closer to indigenous people of Australia • A global approach is required if we’re to achieve real sustainability • Demonstrates what is possible for Australia- provides leadership in some areas. • Can Europe learn from Australia? • Strong focus on economic tools- good/bad? • Unbundling rights • Australia’s strength is ICT enablement INCLUDING rural areas • In Australia the governing parties dominate, whereas, in European countries parliament is more important • Different process for achieving funding and policy direction • In Europe the cadastre plays a far more important role • Buildings and land use are included in European models- this tends to bring people into focus

  9. Further steps… • Hold next meeting in Netherlands 2007, Bavaria 2009 • Politicians and other stakeholders involved? • Would another meeting be of value further into the project? • Do we need to extend the project? • Better marketing of the model is required • A final discussion/white paper is required as a potential future policy paper • Core problem cases (RRRs) need identification to build funding argument for ministers • National approach- COAG? Or International approach? • Sustainability is understood- What about Cadastre? SDI? • Consideration of the marine dimension? Marine cadastral datamodels? What can Europe offer?

More Related