310 likes | 427 Views
Presented by. From the University of Kentucky Libraries:Carol Pitts DiedrichsBecky RyderKerri ScannellKelly VickeryConsultant:Maureen Sullivan. Overview . Teams: The Starting PointThe Work of RestructuringRollout, React and RegroupDiscussion. Key Concepts. Focus on the userFocus on work processes Build on the successes of teamsInvite and involve employee feedback at every stepWork within the welcome boundaries Renew the emphasis on accountability..
E N D
1. Downstream From Team Riding the Rapids of Reorganization
2. Presented by From the University of Kentucky Libraries:
Carol Pitts Diedrichs
Becky Ryder
Kerri Scannell
Kelly Vickery
Consultant:
Maureen Sullivan
3. Overview Teams: The Starting Point
The Work of Restructuring
Rollout, React and Regroup
Discussion Overview:
Overview:
4. Key Concepts Focus on the user
Focus on work processes
Build on the successes of teams
Invite and involve employee feedback at every step
Work within the welcome boundaries
Renew the emphasis on accountability.
5. The Stage is Set
14 libraries
3 millionth volume
UKy “Top Twenty” Vision
Team based management
Budget crisis, hiring freezes
6 months to evaluate
Reorganization Retreat Jan. 2004
silos
6 separate teams in 14 locations; was not an integrated library system
no standardization across the system: very difficult, esp with infrastructure, to have consistent, equitable, excellent service to users or support for the staff who serve the users.
Nominally, “rotating” mgt
Accountability problems, especially regards internal procedures and work performance
Established listservs but they were not a substitute for meetings or personal discussions or phone calls
Odd mixture of decision making: policy making w/o authority vs. immobilized groups due to the need for complete consensus
Leaders can’t lead because of the need for absolute consensus; need a structure that permits leaders to lead
Flat organization offers few career paths
Duplication of effort
Cross-disciplinary users were the most frustrated
silos
6 separate teams in 14 locations; was not an integrated library system
no standardization across the system: very difficult, esp with infrastructure, to have consistent, equitable, excellent service to users or support for the staff who serve the users.
Nominally, “rotating” mgt
Accountability problems, especially regards internal procedures and work performance
Established listservs but they were not a substitute for meetings or personal discussions or phone calls
Odd mixture of decision making: policy making w/o authority vs. immobilized groups due to the need for complete consensus
Leaders can’t lead because of the need for absolute consensus; need a structure that permits leaders to lead
Flat organization offers few career paths
Duplication of effort
Cross-disciplinary users were the most frustrated
6. Old Org Chart
7. Reorganization Work Group (RWG) 7 members
Dean of Libraries selected
The Consultant would meet and facilitate
3 meetings (beginning, middle, rollout)
Conference calls
Listserv
Frequent, well-managed meetings
Timeline: Feb. 17 to mid-May
Carol selected after considering “recommendations, comment or votes” by staff
4 faculty librarns
1 services ceneter leader (adminstriatror librariand/faculty
2 support staffCarol selected after considering “recommendations, comment or votes” by staff
4 faculty librarns
1 services ceneter leader (adminstriatror librariand/faculty
2 support staff
8. What’s Out There? Organization Charts
Readings
Various articles
OCLC Environmental Scan
Discussion
Google Meets Ebay
Organigraphs
9. Organigraphs
10. Major Reading The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern Recognition
Summarized chapters
Lengthy discussions
Driving force of Trends Sessions
11. Trends Outcomes: What They Said
Our work is important to our users
Google rules
Staff feel detached from student body and faculty
What haven’t you noticed lately? Faculty!!
12. Trends Outcomes: What We Observed Good participation
Curiosity about utility of Trends Sessions in determining new org
Need a nimble, user-focused org
The user wants to know, wants to learn,
BUT,
Does not necessarily want to be taught or want to read instructions
13. Important Questions to Consider
How do we work closely in this new environment with students and faculty?
How can we meet their needs in a different way through the work we do?
What can we stop doing?
What should we be doing instead?
14. What Do Users Want Stuff
Get stuff
Find Stuff
Borrow Material
Study Space
Desktop Access
Get Advice
15. Restructuring with the Consultant
Post-it Note deconstruction exercise
Break it down into small parts
Reassemble in like batches
Aligned with the “Stuff” wanted by users
What work supports these needs?
16. Next Steps
Create “process maps”
Subdivide “Purple Pods” and define
Develop new terminology
18. New Terminology
Purple Pods = Collaboratives
Sub-areas = Clusters
20. Implementation Outline I. Leadership Selection
A. Establish leadership competencies
B. Form Leadership Screening Committee
C. Evaluate and select leaders
II. Reassign Staff in the New Organization
A. Establish principles to guide the reassignment
B. All staff state their preferences for position
C. Assignment to Collaboratives are determined
III. Work Design
A. Establish criteria for Work Design Groups
B. Assign volunteers to Work Design Groups
C. Design the work
21. Collaborative Leaders The Selection Process
Establish competencies for the new leadership
Form a Leaders Screening Committee.
Leader nomination & presentations
Feedback from attendees
The Committee’s role
Leaders named Aug. 16
22. And the Questions Are: Describe someone who has been an effective leader for you and why.
Describe what challenges you see in this reorganization for a leader?
Describe where in the new organization you see opportunities for you as a leader and what would you bring to the position?
23. What Color is Your Collaborative?
24. Apply for the Job of Your Dreams! The aspects of this collaborative and cluster that really interest me are: Why?
How will your knowledge, skills and interests contribute to the work and performance outcomes of this collaborative?
Other comments?
25. Reassignment Principles
Confidentiality
First preferences will be given serious consideration
Assignments will be made based upon the anticipated amount of work in each collaborative and cluster
26. Reassignment Principles, Cont’d
Specific work design will be determined once the employee assignments have been made
Training in the new competencies
Employees will work at the same classification level as they currently do
The process will not include promotions
28. The New Org Chart
29. The Reorg Work Groups & Number of Staff Involved Service Center Team (SCT) 12
January Retreat 35
RWG 7
Screening Committee for Leadership 7
New Leadership Group (1st pass) 8
Work Design Teams 35
Executive Committee 7
30. Contact Us
Carol Pitts Diedrichs diedrichs@uky.edu
Becky Ryder rjryde01@uky.edu
Maureen Sullivan msull317@aol.com
Kerri Scannell scannel@uky.edu
Kelly Vickery kmvick0@uky.edu
31. Contact Us University of Kentucky Libraries http://www.uky.edu/Libraries
Reorganization Documents
http://www.uky.edu/Libraries/staffinfo.html#reorg
32. The End