1 / 24

Jim Batterson VSBA Annual Conference Williamsburg, VA November 17, 2011

VA 2010 Science SOL Revisions & Next Generation Science Standards: Status A Short Summary for Policy-Makers. Jim Batterson VSBA Annual Conference Williamsburg, VA November 17, 2011. Thom Pinelli Thomas.e.pinelli@nasa.gov. Jim Batterson Jimbatterson@live.com. Outline. Define our terms!

melora
Download Presentation

Jim Batterson VSBA Annual Conference Williamsburg, VA November 17, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. VA 2010 Science SOL Revisions & Next Generation Science Standards: StatusA Short Summary for Policy-Makers Jim BattersonVSBA Annual Conference Williamsburg, VA November 17, 2011 Thom Pinelli Thomas.e.pinelli@nasa.gov Jim Batterson Jimbatterson@live.com

  2. Outline • Define our terms! • Good K-12 STEM Standards - Process • VA K-12 Science • VA K-12 Engineering • Next Generation Science Stds (National)

  3. STEM Components & Innovation Defined • Science – the studyof the physical world and its manifestations, especially through systematic observation and experiments. • Technology – the application of scientific and engineering knowledge to achieve a practical result. • Engineering – the creation or development of new devices and objects that are of importance or value to humans and society. • Mathematics – a branch of pure science or philosophy (logic) that in its applied state can be used to help make quantitative analysis and predictions for science, technology, and engineering. • Innovation – Creation of new value

  4. The 2010 Gulf Oil Spill: Scientists’ & Engineers’ Roles • The Saturday May 29 NY Times had two articles correctly • emphasizing the difference in focus of engineers versus scientists • (though both rely heavily on one another's work in the end) • pg A10: "Little Headway on Leak is Made by Engineers" • pg A11: "Scientists Build a Case for Undersea Plumes" • Scientists are focused on discovery and understanding; • Engineers are focused on solving a societal problem

  5. Example 1:Humans to the Moon and Safely Home Need for National Response to Sputnik/Cold War/Missile Gap Carried out by: Humans to the Moonand Safely Return Engineers & many other professions & skills Innovation – Rockets, Protective Clothing, Computers Engineers, Technicians & Scientists Technology – Scientists & Engineers Science – Newton’s Laws of Motion/Gravitation, Chemistry Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Calculus Mathematics – Mathematicians

  6. Three Skill-sets Must Play Together for Good STEM Standards University Good STEM Standards Gov’t labs Industry Practicing Scientists & Engineers State Departments of Education K-12 Teachers & Schools of Ed Pedagogy Experts Stds Writing Experts Subject Matter Experts How It is “Catalogued” How It’s Taught* What is Taught * Including appropriate age/grade level

  7. Bringing a Broad Practitioners’ Perspective to VA K-12 STEM Standards • Virginia Secretary of Education and NASA co-sponsor panels of scientists and engineers to carry out independent standards review in 2007 • Capstone science courses of chemistry & physics • K-12 program in engineering • Science panels’ findings will inform State Board of Education 2010 septennial science SOL (standards) Review

  8. Distribution of Panelists in 2007 VA SOL Gap Analysis • University • UVA • VA Tech • W&M • HU • CNU • JMU • VCU/J. Sargent Reynolds CC • University of Southern California • ODU • Industry • Northrop-Grumman • Micron Technology • LUNA Innovations • National Institute of Aerospace • Lockheed Martin • Research Labs • Jefferson Lab (DOE) • NSWC – Dahlgren (DOD) • NSWC – Indian Head (DOD) • NASA – Langley (Exec Agency) • NASA – Johnson (Exec Agency) • Naval Research Lab (DOD) • K-12 • Chantilly Academy Fairfax • Jamestown High School • Appomattox Gov School • Newport News Public Schools • Piedmont Governor’s School +Panel membership did not cover “A to Z” but did cover “A to W” (Astronaut to Weed Scientist!) *This is unique in that K-12 SOL committees are often populated almost entirely by K-12 people

  9. Charge to Scientist Panels • Charge to Panels: What (physics/chemistry) content do the 80% - 90% of Virginia’s high school students* who rely on SOL (state standards) need to know to participate in political, economic, social, and technological world of the 21st century? • Preparing to be a competent citizen: Not about advanced science *In 2006-07, 14.6% of VA high school students took AP, 1% were in governor’s schools, 0.3% in IB

  10. Findings & Recommendations • Finding: VA Science SOL are very well written & articulated BUT reflect a century old approach to science with content dated to the 1960’s (Sputnik era) • Recommendations (Science) • Move from a discipline-centric curriculum in high school to “Science & Engineering 1,2,3,4”, or • Adopt Leon Lederman’s “ARISE” program which teaches physics first, followed by chemistry, and then biology, or • At a minimum, replace some outdated content in the current courses with 21st century content

  11. SOL as Found in 2007 (2003 revision) • Cathode ray tubes (TV picture tubes) were taught but not transistors, LED, LCD, • or plasmas • In a world that, one might argue, is dominated by molecular biology, organic • chemistry had been removed from the chemistry course standards in 2003 • Nuclear physics was limited to protons (1919) and neutrons (1932), with no mention • of their quark (1964) components • Modern investigative technologies and methodologies such as modeling and • simulation and “lab on a chip” were absent • Nanoscale behaviors and nanotechnology were not mentioned • Fifth graders, physical science, chemistry, and physics students will be introduced • to nanotechnology; • Physical science, chemistry, and physics students will now learn about quarks, • the currently accepted building blocks of protons and neutrons; • Grades six through twelve will use modeling and simulation in their scientific • investigations; • LED’s, diodes and transistors are in physical science; • Plasmas as a fourth state of matter has joined solids, liquids, and gases in physical • science and chemistry. • Chemistry meets 21st century (molecular) biology as students explicitly see RNA, DNA, • and amino acids in both courses. • Pluto is introduced as a member of a new category of dwarf planets in 6th grade and • earth science. 2010 SOL & Curriculum Framework Excerpts (Good News!)

  12. But What About the “E” of STEM?

  13. Example of a Complex NASA Planetary Lander System Project *Science requirements for instruments defined by scientists* Integration of multiple models as noted in a typical Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Simulation Scientists & Engineers Scientists provide; Engineers use Engineers Engineers Mars Global Surveyer/Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter

  14. Some Selected Findings & Recommendations from the 2007 Engineering Panel • There is no institutionalized “STEM” program in VA - we have MST (pronounce “muztuh”) • Engineering is classified as CTE (not Instruction) at VA DOE where, over the past 15 years, there have been several initiatives (from CTE) to promote some engineering in the state, • However, engineering is notrequired for students in VA, nor is it generally available to all students. • Engineering Design Process differs from Scientific Method, is the parent of technological innovation, and should be required content in VA • Women and minorities continue to be under-represented in engineering profession • There are myriad national and local programs for students to have engineering experiences but, in Virginia, ONLY IF their local school or school division takes the initiative

  15. “Turnkey” S&E in K-12 STEM • Curricula “E” Examples: • Project Lead The Way (HS) • PLTW Gateways (MS) • VA Children’s Engineering (K-5) • Annual Conf in February • Engineering is Elementary (K-5) • Project Infinity (HS) • Partnership for Advanced Studies (PAS) (HS global) • Governor’s academies and schools • VA MathScience Innovation Center 2015 plan • Extra-curricula “E”: • FIRST • Junior Lego League, FIRST LEGO, FIRST Tech, FIRST Robotics • Sea Perch (ONR, MIT) • SNAME (Society of Naval Architects & Marine Engineers) Boatbuilding (K-12) • Future Cities (National Engineers Week) • Egg Drop Contest (ASME & others) • F1 in Schools (Formula One racing) • Science & Engineering Fairs • NASA “VASTS” • STIHL Summer Program

  16. THEORY S K I L L C O M P O N E N T S HANDS-ON Theoretical Physics Experimental Physics Discover languagesto quantitatively describe existing world Discover & describe existing world Fabricate & operate new systems Build or repair existing systems/components Design & buildnew systems Traditional Welding HVAC Electricity Plumbing Electronics Manufacturing (Surgeon 19th C.) A+ Comp Repair Comp Network Admin CISCO Network ORACLE Internet CAD Model & Simulation Wind Tunnel Aircraft Maintenance Airframe/Powerplant Particle Detectors Integrated Circuits Aerospace Automotive Chemical Electronics Computer Civil Model & Simulation Research Surgeon Algebraist Geometer Topologist Statistician Physicist Chemist Biologist Research MD Astronomer Geologist 21st Century 2-yr college/OJT 4-yr College (+) 4-yr College (+) 4-yr College (+) HS with National Certifications CTE Current K-12 “Gap” Traditional Academic * Sometimes “Instrument Maker” Jimbatterson@live.com – May 2007

  17. VA General Assembly Joint Resolution SJ 308 (2011) In part…… …. Therefore Be It …. **Report from VDOE to General Assembly due in January**

  18. Next Generation Science Standards(National) • National Research Council (NRC) “Framework” published July 2011 (one year after public comment) • Previous national standards documents dated (NSES - 1996; AAAS Benchmarks -1993; Committee of Ten-1894) • Lead committee of 18 university scientists, engineers, & educators plus 4 multi-faceted design teams • Non-profit “Achieve, Inc” responsible for managing development of “Standards” • Will fit within NRC Framework as content guidance • Delivered in late 2012 • National in scope but carried out by states • Carried out by 20 lead state partners & additional writing team members from 13 more states (writing team member from VA) • Critical stakeholders review • Business & industry, Workforce development, K12, Subject matter experts, State stds & assessments, …

  19. A Framework for K-12 Science EducationCommittee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards(National Research Council of the National Academies)July 19, 2011 • “The committee recommends that science education in grades K-12 be built around three major dimensions. These dimensions are: • Scientific and engineering practices; • Crosscutting concepts that unify the study of science and engineering through their common application across fields; • Core ideas in four disciplinary areas: physical sciences; life sciences; earth and space sciences; and engineering, technology, and the applications of science”* *Executive Summary, page ES-1

  20. Some Example NRC Grade 12 Guidelines & “Boundaries” “Knowledge of quantum physics enabled the development of semi- conductors, computer chips, and lasers, all of which are essential components of modern imaging, communication, and information technology. BOUNDARY: Details of quantum physics are not formally taught at this grade level.” “…the states (I.e. solid, liquid, gas, plasma)…..” “Information can be digitized (e.g. a picture stored as the values of an array of pixels); in this form, it can be stored reliably in computer memory and sent over long distances as a series of wave pulses.” “When a system has a large number of component pieces, one may not be able to predict much about its precise future; For such systems (e.g. with very many colliding molecules), one can often predict average, but not detailed properties and behaviors…” “…atoms have a charged substructure of a nucleus (made from protons and neutrons) surrounded by electrons…. BOUNDARY: The following topics are not required: the structures within protons and neutrons; the existence of quarks…”

  21. VA is already putting in place from 2010 Science SOL revision… • National Research Council’s “A Framework for K-12 Science Education (July 2011) • “Models, particularly modern computer simulations that encode relevant physical laws and properties of materials, can be especially helpful both in realizing and testing designs for structures such as buildings, bridges, or aircraft, that are expensive to construct and that must survive extreme conditions that occur only on rare occasions” (pg 3-8) • “By grade 12, students should be able to (pg 3-14): • “Recognize that computer simulations are based on mathematical models that incorporate underlying assumptions about the phenomena or systems being studied.” • “Use simple test-cases of mathematical expressions, computer programs, or simulations - that is, compare their outcomes with what is known about the real world - to see if they “make sense”.”

  22. Summary and Some Final Thoughts • VA Science SOL/CF much improved (implement 2012-13 school year) • Teacher training needed in content • Local tech industries embed STEM teachers in summer • VA does not institutionalize Engineering • Engineering not recognized as teacher “endorsement” • Think about a “Science & Engineering” Dept • Possible VSBA policy position? • Next Gen Science Standards will emphasize science and engineering - due out late 2012 • Many opportunities for engineering in both curriculum and extra-curricula activities - BUT must be local initiative • VA Children’s Engineering (K-5) is a must do! • Make PLTW or equivalent available to ALL students

  23. Backup Slide

  24. Example 3:Air Transportation Vehicle (Practical Airplane) Military needs for WW I Carried out by: Curtis Jenny and other practical airplanes Engineers & many other professions & skills Innovation – Wright Flyer (Prototype for a practical airplane) Technology – Engineers, Technicians Internal combustion engine, Wind tunnel, Wing warping Engineers, Technicians & Scientists Technology – Scientists & Engineers Science – Newton’s Laws of Motion, Fluids, Chemistry Mathematics – Algebra, Trigonometry, Geometry Mathematicians

More Related