validity and reliability n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Validity and Reliability PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Validity and Reliability

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 19

Validity and Reliability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Think in terms of ‘ the purpose of tests ’ and the ‘ consistency ’ with which the purpose is fulfilled/met. Validity and Reliability. Neither Valid nor Reliable. Reliable but not Valid. Fairly Valid but not very Reliable. Valid & Reliable. Validity. Depends on the PURPOSE

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

Validity and Reliability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. Think in terms of ‘the purpose of tests’ and the ‘consistency’ with which the purpose is fulfilled/met Validity and Reliability Neither Valid nor Reliable Reliable but not Valid Fairly Valid but not very Reliable Valid & Reliable

    2. Validity • Depends on the PURPOSE • E.g. a ruler may be a valid measuring device for length, but isn’t very valid for measuring volume • Measuring what ‘it’ is supposed to • Matter of degree (how valid?) • Specific to a particular purpose! • Must be inferred from evidence; cannot be directly measured • Learning outcomes • Content coverage (relevance?) • Level & type of student engagement (cognitive, affective, psychomotor) – appropriate?

    3. Reliability • Consistency in the type of result a test yields • Time & space • participants • Not perfectly similar result but ‘very close-to’ being similar • When someone says you are a ‘reliable’ person, what do they really mean? • Are you a reliable person? 

    4. What do you think…? • Forced-choice assessment forms are high in reliability, but weak in validity (true/false) • Performance-based assessment forms are high in both validity and reliability (true/false) • A test item is said to be unreliable when most students answered the item wrongly (true/false) • When a test contains items that do not represent the content covered during instruction, it is known as an unreliable test (true/false) • Test items that do not successfully measure the intended learning outcomes (objectives) are invalid items (true/false) • Assessment that does not represent student learning well enough are definitely invalid and unreliable (true/false) • A valid test can sometimes be unreliable (true/false) • If a test is valid, it is reliable! (by-product)

    5. Question… In the context of what you understand about VALIDITY and RELIABILITY, how do you go about establishing/ensuring them in your own test papers?

    6. Indicators of quality • Validity • Reliability • Utility • Fairness Question: how are they all inter-related?

    7. Types of validity measures • Face validity • Construct validity • Content validity • Criterion validity • Predictive • Concurrent • Consequences validity

    8. Face Validity • Does it appear to measure what it is supposed to measure? • Example: Let’s say you are interested in measuring, ‘Propensity towards violence and aggression’. By simply looking at the following items, state which ones qualify to measure the variable of interest: • Have you been arrested? • Have you been involved in physical fighting? • Do you get angry easily? • Do you sleep with your socks on? • Is it hard to control your anger? • Do you enjoy playing sports?

    9. Construct Validity • Does the test measure the ‘human’ CHARACTERISTIC(s) it is supposed to? • Examples of constructs or ‘human’ characteristics: • Mathematical reasoning • Verbal reasoning • Musical ability • Spatial ability • Mechanical aptitude • Motivation • Applicable to PBA/authentic assessment • Each construct is broken down into its component parts • E.g. ‘motivation’ can be broken down to: • Interest • Attention span • Hours spent • Assignments undertaken and submitted, etc. All of these sub-constructs put together – measure ‘motivation’

    10. Content Validity • How well elements of the test relate to the content domain? • How closely content of questions in the test relates to content of the curriculum? • Directly relates to instructional objectives and the fulfillment of the same! • Major concern for achievement tests (where content is emphasized) • Can you test students on things they have not been taught?

    11. How to establish Content Validity? • Instructional objectives (looking at your list) • Table of Specification • E.g. • At the end of the chapter, the student will be able to do the following: • Explain what ‘stars’ are • Discuss the type of stars and galaxies in our universe • Categorize different constellations by looking at the stars • Differentiate between our stars, the sun, and all other stars

    12. Table of Specification (An Example)

    13. Criterion Validity • The degree to which content on a test (predictor) correlates with performance on relevant criterion measures (concrete criterion in the "real" world?) • If they do correlate highly, it means that the test (predictor) is a valid one! • E.g. if you taught skills relating to ‘public speaking’ and had students do a test on it, the test can be validated by looking at how it relates to actual performance (public speaking) of students inside or outside of the classroom

    14. Two Types of Criterion Validity • Concurrent Criterion Validity = how well performance on a test estimates current performance on some valued measure (criterion)? (e.g. test of dictionary skills can estimate students’ current skills in the actual use of dictionary – observation) • Predictive Criterion Validity = how well performance on a test predicts future performance on some valued measure (criterion)? (e.g. reading readiness test might be used to predict students’ achievement in reading) • Both are only possible IF the predictors are VALID

    15. Consequences Validity • The extent to which the assessment served its intended purpose • Did the test improve performance? Motivation? Independent learning? • Did it distort the focus of instruction? • Did it encourage or discourage creativity? Exploration? Higher order thinking?

    16. Factors that can lower Validity • Unclear directions • Difficult reading vocabulary and sentence structure • Ambiguity in statements • Inadequate time limits • Inappropriate level of difficulty • Poorly constructed test items • Test items inappropriate for the outcomes being measured • Tests that are too short • Improper arrangement of items (complex to easy?) • Identifiable patterns of answers • Teaching • Administration and scoring • Students • Nature of criterion

    17. Reliability • Measure of consistency of test results from one administration of the test to the next • Generalizability – consistency (interwoven concepts) – if a test item is reliable, it can be correlated with other items to collectively measure a construct or content mastery • A component of validity • Length of assessment

    18. Measuring Reliability • Test – retest Give the same test twice to the same group with any time interval between tests • Equivalent forms(similar in content, difficulty level, arrangement, type of assessment, etc.) Give two forms of the test to the same group in close succession • Split-half Test has two equivalent halves. Give test once, score two equivalent halves (odd items vs. even items) • Cronbach Alpha (SPSS) Inter-item consistency – one test – one administration • Inter-rater Consistency (subjective scoring) Calculate percent of exact agreement by using Pearson's product moment and find out the coefficient of determination (SPSS)

    19. How to improve Reliability? • Quality of items; concise statements, homogenous words (some sort of uniformity) • Adequate sampling of content domain; comprehensiveness of items • Longer assessment – less distorted by chance factors • Developing a scoring plan (esp. for subjective items – rubrics) • Ensure VALIDITY