1 / 9

Ethics and Politics of Computational Social Science

Ethics and Politics of Computational Social Science. Joy Rohde Associate Professor, Public Policy and History a nd Interim Director, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program joyrohde@umich.edu. Roadmap. You should care about big data ethics

mcassandra
Download Presentation

Ethics and Politics of Computational Social Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ethics and Politics of Computational Social Science Joy Rohde Associate Professor, Public Policy and History and Interim Director, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program joyrohde@umich.edu

  2. Roadmap • You should care about big data ethics • Big data poses new and challenging problems for research • Privacy, autonomy (consent), justice and fairness • Resources to learn more

  3. Bigness and potential harm • Volume • Data are people… • Variety and granularity • who can be identified, stigmatized… • Durability • for a long time… • Velocity • quickly and widely.

  4. Potential for harm “The relative ease in engaging multitudes of distributed human subjects (or data about them) through intermediating systems speeds the potential for harms to arise, and extends the range of stakeholders who may be impacted.” D. Dittrich and E. Kenneally, "The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research," Tech. rep., U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Aug 2012.

  5. Privacy • Deidentification is not foolproof • “There is no way to make personal information in databases fully anonymous” (National Research Council, 2008). • Privacy matters for specific reasons that deserve protection: • Freedom of thought and expression • Protect vulnerable and stigmatized individuals and groups • Support socially valuable institutions

  6. How can we think about privacy? • Situational and contextual rather than public/private binary • Right to privacy “is neither the right to secrecy nor a right to control but a right to appropriate flow of personal information.” • Helen Nissenbaum, Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life (2010)

  7. Autonomy • Informed consent? • Is it feasible? • When is it non-coerced?

  8. Digital Ethical Reasoning Is not a box to check Is contextual, ongoing, iterative Matters because data are people and research with them affects their chances in life

  9. Getting Started Association of Internet Researchers ethics resources, https://aoir.org/ethics/ S. Barocas and d. boyd, “Engaging the ethics of data science in practice,” Communications of the ACM 60 (11), 23-25. M. C. Benigni et al. “Online extremism and communities that sustain it,” PLoS One 12.2 (2017). d. boyd and Kate Crawford, “Critical Questions for Big Data,” Information, Communication, and Society 15 (2012): 662-679. J. Lane, et al., Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good(2014).

More Related