320 likes | 484 Views
Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members!. Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008. First things first!. THANK YOU!
E N D
Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members! Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008
First things first! • THANK YOU! • WSQA’s mission: Improving the way we live, learn, and work in Washington by helping organizations improve through the use of the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence
Objectives For This Class • WSQA Overview • Ethics Review • PEPD Time commitment • PEPD Roles and Responsibilities • Lite and Full Examination Process Review
Introductions • Name, organization, what you do • Questions and expectations? • What do you like to do when you’re not working? • PEPD Members
What is WSQA? • Created by State law to: • Promote excellence • Recognize achievement • Educate and train • Patterned after the Baldrige National Quality Award • Awards presented annually by the Governor • Awarded to private, public, and not-for-profit organizations in manufacturing, service, education, and healthcare
What is WSQA? WSQA is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization supported by • Corporate donations • Individual memberships • Workshop, collaborative and conference fees • Many (many, many!) volunteer hours
Who is WSQA? • Examiners • Lite Assessment • Full Assessment • Certification follows assessment • Senior Examiners • Level 3 Team Leads • Scorebook Editors • Panel of Examiner & Process Development (PEPD) Mentors • Panel of Judges • Board of Directors • Advisory Panel • Executive Director and support team
2. WSQA Ethics Review • Ethics Statement • Conflict of Interest form and statement
Conflict of interest issues • WSQA seeks to avoid conflict of interest to protect process integrity • Conflicts are frequent! • First step in assignment process: determine any conflicts
Conflict of Interest Exercise • Pick any organization (not yours) • Complete the Conflict of Interest form for that organization
3. PEPD Time Commitments • Monthly meeting 1 ½ hour • Lite team mentoring Quarterly • E-mails ½ hour • Review examiner inputs stage 1- 1.5 hour • Follow up with team members- .5-1hour • Review consensus comments- 2 hours • Consensus meeting 4-6 hours TOTAL 10 hours for lite process • Team involvement 1-2 hours /month (optional) TOTAL TIME COMMITMENT: 4- 6 hours/month
4. PEPD Roles & Responsibilities • Process Ethics • Process Integrity- Team follows process • Process Completion • Examiner growth- Mentoring • Process Improvement • Monthly meetings • Examiner training input • Process improvement input
PEPD TEAMS • Examiner Training • Process Review • Governance • Repeat Applicant Process
5. WSQA Full and Lite Process Comparison Table- website http://www.wsqa.net/criteria.php Time Table – website
Preparing for independent review • Read the criteria • Read the application • Familiarize yourself with the online tool • Site: http://www.shawresources.com/ • Login information in email from WSQA • Training at https://cc.readytalk.com/play?id=o6d1b4j9 (part 1) and https://cc.readytalk.com/play?id=gc87umbs (part 2) • Check in with Team Lead on Key Factors and after entering category 1 and associated results
Independent review • Select the most relevant Key Factors (from list) • Read the criteria for the category • Read (and annotate) the relevant section of the application • Identify and record the applicant’s processes • Record observations. Note missing responses and significant observations • Recommend a scoring range for the category
Independent review steps - process • Review related criteria • Read the category under review, take notes • Select relevant key factors from list • Identify & record processes • Record observations on ADLI: • Approach • Deployment • Learning • Integration • Identify any significant or missing responses
Record observations on “ADLI” “Learning” refers to • Refining the approach through cycles of evaluation and improvement • Encouraging breakthrough change to your approach (innovation) • Sharing refinements and innovations with other relevant work units and processes
Record observations on “ADLI” “Integration” refers to the harmonization of • Plans • Processes • Information • Resource decisions • Actions • Results • Analyses to support key, organization-wide goals
Record observations on “ADLI” Questions to ask in analyzing “Integration” • Do the individual components of a performance management system operate as a fully interconnected unit? • Is the approach aligned with the organizational needs identified in the Organizational Profile?
Process diagnosis: key concepts Integration examples: • Alignment of objectives and action plans with strategic challenges AND mission, vision, values • Alignment of product/service delivery methods with KEY customer requirements • Alignment of key process measures with KEY customer requirements
Consensus preparation and call(s) • Each Examiner responds with agreement, suggestions for changes, or disagreement, stating rationales • Category Lead facilitates consensus • Team Lead and/or PEPD mentor leads final scoring discussion • Can take anywhere from 4-8 hours (depending on what?)
Comment, scoring considerations • “Benefit of the doubt” • Give credit for what’s in the application • Don’t penalize for incidental exceptions • Not every process must show complete “DLI” • Not every results example must include “TCI”
Comment, scoring considerations • For LITE, only one score for entire results Category 7 • Propose a score for results related to your categories • Be prepared to reach team consensus for all of Category 7 • Using scoring language can help the applicant understand comments and score
6. Examiner Software Down load manual and webinar from our website: http://www.wsqa.net/Extimetable.php Log on to Examiner software at: https://www.shawresources.com/pea2007
THANK YOU!! Your support and participation as Examiners helps us all by helping WSQA fulfill its mission!