80 likes | 157 Views
Explore the strategic initiatives and collaborative efforts of SHERPA Project Manager, Bill Hubbard, in promoting institutionally-based e-print repositories for research dissemination. Learn about SHERPA's aims, outcomes, partners, funding, and advocacy strategies for open access resources within a broader research context.
E N D
IBERs and eTheses eTheses in the wider research context- National level - Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham
SHERPA aims and outcomes • IBERs - institutionally-based e-print repositories • Advice - setting up, IPR, deposit, preservation • Advocacy - awareness, promotion, change
SHERPA Project • Development Partners • Nottingham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Oxford, White Rose Consortium, British Library, AHDS • Associate Partners • Birmingham, Bristol, Cambridge, Newcastle, Durham, London LEAP Consortium • Funding from JISC and CURL
Institutionally-based e-print repositories • Institutional basis • Institutional integration • Cultural change • Adopt existing professional perspectives
IBERs in institutions • One repository - or many - what is the difference? • pre-print and post-print IBERs • a suite of open access resources • integration into information strategies
Broader Context • OAI - OAJ, OAR • ARROWs, DARE • Berlin Declaration • Wellcome Trust • Parliamentary Inquiry
IBERs and eTheses • Shared aims - to disseminate research • Shared concerns - process, IPR, plagiarism, preservation • Shared solutions - software, portals, work-flows • Shared advocacy - three constituencies, three targets • Shared strategy - open access, institutional perspectives, individual actions