Maximising learning dialogue opportunities in professional field based experiences
Download
1 / 10

MAXIMISING LEARNING DIALOGUE OPPORTUNITIES IN PROFESSIONAL FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 90 Views
  • Uploaded on

MAXIMISING LEARNING DIALOGUE OPPORTUNITIES IN PROFESSIONAL FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES. Andrew Smith, Marion Sanders, Suzzanne Barthow o n behalf of the rest of the team: Bev Norsworthy, Phillip Ozanne , Cindy Weydemann and Lynne Miles,

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'MAXIMISING LEARNING DIALOGUE OPPORTUNITIES IN PROFESSIONAL FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES' - maura


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Maximising learning dialogue opportunities in professional field based experiences

MAXIMISING LEARNING DIALOGUE OPPORTUNITIES IN PROFESSIONAL FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

Andrew Smith, Marion Sanders, Suzzanne Barthow

on behalf of the rest of the team:

Bev Norsworthy, Phillip Ozanne, Cindy Weydemann and Lynne Miles,

and our admin assistance: Karen Welson, Pam Fisher, Jane Eccles and Donnelle Newson.


Maximising learning dialogues
Maximising Learning Dialogues FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

  • “Enriched learning dialogue” is believed to be essential to field-based components of professional preparation.

  • Assumptions that field-based practicum experiences are effective can be inaccurate.

  • This study focuses on professional preparation programmes for Early Childhood Education and for Counselling.

  • Collaborative study: BTI, NZTC & Wintec.

  • Seeks to review the use of intentional strategies aimed at developing professional learning dialogue.


The process
The Process FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

  • Initial questionnaires re perceptions of supervision – semester 1, 2010.

  • Use of four interventions through semester 2, 2010.

  • Questionnaire to review use of the interventions – end of 2010.

  • Preliminary data analysis – early 2011.

  • Running the preliminary findings past a sub-set of participants – current.

  • Report writing and resource development – May – August.


The participant group
The Participant group FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

  • Initial group of 27 dyads, from four programmes, three institutions, based geographically through two islands from Auckland to Queenstown.

  • Counselling and Early Childhood Education degree programmes.

  • Students from each year of their programme in which practicum experience occurs.

  • Student age range: 23 – 61 years old.

  • AT/supervisor years of experience in the role: 1 – 11 years.


About supervision in general
About supervision in general FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

Data provides strong statements about

  • Preferred roles within supervision

  • Desire of both students and supervisors for relationship

  • Commonality of difficulty of access/time to talk

  • Degree of agency

  • Overall effectiveness of supervision

  • Mismatch between what supervisors say and what students perceive happens

  • Mismatch between institutions’ goals and actual experience on practicum


About the interventions
About the interventions FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

  • Partnership map

    A path to go by

    Establishing solid base for a professional relationship

  • Belief inventory

    • Allowed us to see perspectives of interpretation

  • Critical incident

    • Promotes honest reflection,

    • Dealing with real life outcomes

  • Research article

    • Made us dig deeper


  • About the interventions1
    About FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCESthe interventions

    Main benefits

    • Brought structure, scaffolding, intentionality, an invitation to step into learning conversations

    • Recognised link between structure and relationship

    • Facilitated discussion about beliefs, worldview, professional understanding

    • Changed nature of supervisory role – support and encouragement but also critical friend, evaluator, observer, professional peer

    • All deemed useful but…


    Proposed outputs
    Proposed outputs FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

    • Final report and executive report

    • Journal articles

      • Counselling

      • Early Childhood

      • Teacher Education (generic)

      • Supervision

    • Self-evaluation tool for supervisors (based on repertory grid)

    • DVD – 5 habits of highly effective mentors

    • Series of pamphlets –related to mentoring. eg building relationship, encouraging learning dialogue, agency in the mentoring relationship, mentor as role model


    The challenges
    The challenges FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

    • The logistics of working across institutions – making material available, arranging times to meet, co-writing…

    • Participant recruitment – it took much perseverance to find the initial group of participants – many who were approached were “too busy” to participate despite the relatively low level of expectation of time commitment.

    • Retaining participant engagement for the duration of the project – some fell by the wayside for a range of reasons without letting us know.

    • The challenge of what constitutes robust data in a qualitative paradigm. We have important stories to tell – generalisation is in the hands of the reader.


    Maximising learning dialogue opportunities in professional field based experiences

    Thank you for listening. FIELD-BASED EXPERIENCES

    Questions and comments?