1 / 10

The Role of Schools of Public Health: Training, research, advocacy and policy

The Role of Schools of Public Health: Training, research, advocacy and policy. OSI Seminar - Varna, Bulgaria Presenter: Don McVinney Lecturer, Columbia University School of Social Work, U.S. National Director of Education and Training, Harm Reduction Coalition, U.S. mcvinney@harmreduction.org.

Download Presentation

The Role of Schools of Public Health: Training, research, advocacy and policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Role of Schools of Public Health: Training, research, advocacy and policy OSI Seminar - Varna, Bulgaria Presenter: Don McVinney Lecturer, Columbia University School of Social Work, U.S. National Director of Education and Training, Harm Reduction Coalition, U.S. mcvinney@harmreduction.org

  2. Education and Training • Teaching– Adult learning (androgogy) versus childhood learning (pedagogy); • Adults have life experience to draw upon: their own resources and experiences

  3. Education • Involves critical thinking • “Opening out” of the mind • Understand the meanings behind social problems • The process of thinking is an end in itself • Connections may not be made about what one is learning until years later • More unpredictable outcome than training • Sometimes students initially feel less skilled because the educator calls into question what they presume to know (unlearning then learning) • More future-oriented • Setting: Classrooms in schools of higher education, such as universities

  4. Training • Providing practical skills that one can employ readily and immediately in one’s work • More factual • More rigid approach to learning • “Narrowing in” of information that is most relevant and useful • More present-focused • Settings: In the community: in-service workshops; community-based organizations

  5. Types of Training • Professional, para-professional or “staff” (volunteer or paid) training and development • Goals: • Give participants new knowledge and information • Provide or enhance skills for professionals to be or to become more effective in their work • Clarification of values (example: attitudes about drug users) • “Popular education” (Paolo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed) • Providing knowledge and skills to clients and consumers; empowerment approach

  6. Types of Knowledge • Specialized knowledge – For example: licit and illicit drugs • Goal: Increase competence related to vulnerable populations or to individuals • “Tacit knowledge” – intuitive and intangible approach • “Professional use of self” (social work) • Postmodern perspective: Many ways of knowing • Philosophically, is intervention an art or a science? (logical positivist versus postmodern debate)

  7. The Need to Impart Knowledge: The gap between research and practice • On the one hand, practice approaches may be several years behind research • Costs of implementation may be prohibitive • There may be political rather than scientific motives for not promoting an effective intervention (example: syringe exchange to reduce HIV infection) • On the other hand, effective clinical interventions may be widely used in the community years before a research grant is written, funded, intervention studied, data analyzed, and disseminated (often to a limited audience)

  8. The Gap Between Research and Practice • Scientific advances are not being incorporated into practice interventions (Conclusion of report, 1998, Institute of Medicine, U.S., Bridging the Gap Between Practice and Research) • Hypotheses: • Lack of ability to communicate to community stakeholders effectively • Few partnerships between academic researchers and policy makers to help communities see the benefits • Political barriers: Politicians may not be scientists • Science is increasing debunked because it is a threat to people of faith who may have political capital

  9. Research-Practice Disconnection • Researchers/academics and practitioners in the community both have vast amounts of knowledge • Knowledge “explosion” and access to information through the internet • Often impossible for practitioners to keep up, even in their own field • Little research is being done to study how information can be disseminated: so-called “technology transfer”

  10. Research and Practice: A Two Way Street • Greater understanding is needed about the different cultures that exist: • Often a separate knowledge base from which we work (scientific versus personal or experiential) can be bridged • Terminology (scientific or vernacular) can be adapted • Academics need to get out into the field more • Community stakeholders need to be invited into the academy to share perspectives

More Related