1 / 33

Joint Activities and Calls in Heritage Practice - Rome 2017

Highlights the implementation of joint activities and calls in heritage practice during the JHEP.2 WP.2 event in Rome, Italy in November 2017. Covers progress, financial commitments, and discussions on improving research visibility and impact in the field.

marvae
Download Presentation

Joint Activities and Calls in Heritage Practice - Rome 2017

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JHEP 2 WP 2. Implementation of joint activities including joint calls Rome (Italy), 29/30 November 2017

  2. JHEP 2 work package 2 Tasks • 2.1 Joint calls • 2.2 Heritage practice • 2.3 Follow up Action Programme and CH governance strategies • 2.4 Case studies • 2.5 Knowledge Hub JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  3. Task 2.1 Joint calls (NWO, AHRC) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  4. 30 November 2016: JPICH Governing Board approved Roadmap for 2017-2019 (D2.1) Four joint JPICH calls • 2017 • Digital Heritage • Heritage in Changing Environments • 2018 • Identity & Perception (previously: 2019) • 2019 • Conservation & Protection (previously: 2018) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  5. Progress since • Digital Heritage • NWO Handling partner • 24 April 2017: launch call for proposals • 22 June 2017: deadline applications • 24-25 October 2017: International Assessment Panel meeting • 28 November 2017: Digital Heritage Management Group funding decision • In numbers: • 34 applications; 31 eligible; • 11 assessedtobeeligibleforfunding; • decisionto fund 8 proposals JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  6. Progress since • Heritage in Changing Environments • MIUR/MIBACT Handling Partner • 4 September 2017: launch call for proposals • 30 November 2017: deadline applications • July- November 2017: • RCE led expert group preparing the focus of the call • MIUR/MIBACT prepared the JPICH Heritage in CE MoU • MIUR/MiBACT prepared Call documentation JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  7. To be discussed • Financial commitments for Conservation & Protection call and preparing focus of the call (Handling Partner MINECO) • Update on request for Cofund for C&P call (JPICH Coordination Office) • Financial commitments for Identity & Perception call (all) • Appointing Handling Partner for call Identity & Perception (all) • Timeline for preparation I&P and C&P calls (Handling Partners) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  8. Task 2.2 Heritage practice (RCL) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  9. Task 2.2 Heritage practice (RCL) One of the important functions of JPICH is to act as a node for research based heritage practice in Europe. Task 2.2 – „heritage practice“ is intended to reinforce this aspect. The main objective is to improve the visibility of research results financed through JPICH. In order to implement objectives of T.2.2 a range of activities may be invoked: dedicated workshops, exchange visits, training modules, etc. JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  10. Task 2.2 Heritage practice (RCL) 3 activities were foreseen and proposed as a result: • First activity aiming to identify objectives; • Second activity aiming to discuss the strategy; • Third activityaiming to perform an action as an experimental tool for knowledge transfer/exchange with heritage practitioners. This structure of T. 2.2 was described in D. 2.4, submission date June 2017 JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  11. Task 2.2 Heritage practice (RCL) Activity 1. Identification phase. Time and place: part of "Parade and LABs Event" (20-21 February 2016, Brussels). Type of activity: presentation and public discussion as part of the event. Aim: to identify the role of JPI CH as a potential node for a research based practice in Europe; to set up a network of operating partners on further implementation of the T.2.2 Result: Three projects were selected as partners: “Smart value”, “PICH” and “H@V“. Status: implemented, D 2.3, submission date July 2016. JHEP 2 WP 2, Cyprus, June 2017

  12. Task 2.2 Heritage practice (RCL) Activity 2. Discussion phase. Time and place: Lithuanian National Commission for UNESCO, September 28-29th 2017, Vilnius Target auditorium: representatives of JPI CH, 3 different projects financed through JPICH (“Smart value”, “PICH” and “H@V“), ICCROM, different research and heritage practice institutions in Lithuania. Aim: Two days’ event covered two separate but interrelated topics of: “Integrating new knowledge into practice” (T.2.2) and “Cultural heritage concepts and theories“ (T.2.3, activity 18). Status: implemented JHEP 2 WP 2, Cyprus, June 2017

  13. Task 2.2 Heritage practice (RCL) The first part of the workshop (September 28th, 2017 “Heritage practice and strategic priorities of JPI CH funded scientific researches”) was foreseen to discuss how to improve the visibility and the impact of the research projects funded by JPI CH. Second part of the workshop (September 29th, 2017 “JPI CH funded scientific researches and question of value of 20th century historic urban landscapes”) was intended as an information sharing seminar. The results of three projects funded by JPI CH (“Smart value”, “PICH” and “H@V“) were presented. Outcome: „The Joint Statement by ICCROM and JPICH on Enhancing Heritage Research Participation and Impact“ have been prepared. Draft version have been circulated and discussed among the members of JPICH. JHEP 2 WP 2, Cyprus, June 2017

  14. Workshop in Vilnius, September 28 2017

  15. Task 2.2 Heritage practice (RCL) Activity 3. Implementation phase. Time and place: June 2018, Kaunas, Lithuania Type of activity: summer school module as a pilot instrument for knowledge exchange. Aim: training for heritage practitioners and students as a tool for dissemination results of JPICH funded projects on the case study of Kaunas historic urban landscape (European heritage label site). Materials on methodology on evaluation of 20th century urban landscapes after the summer school will be published. Target auditorium and: representatives of JPI CH, representatives of projects financed through JPICH, representatives from the organizations of practitioners (ICCROM, ICOMOS Lithuania etc.). This action will be open for heritage professionals and/or heritage field students and will be implemented together with „Kaunas – European Capital of Culture 2022“. JHEP 2 WP 2, Cyprus June 2017

  16. Task 2.3 Follow up Action Programme 2016-2018 and CH Governance Strategies (RCE) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  17. Follow up Action Programme 2016-2018 • November 2016: GB decision on 13 joint activities • December 2016: guidance on managing joint activities (D 2.6) • June 2017: Report on the activities (D 2.7) • June 2018: Midterm report • December 2019: Final report JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  18. Follow up Action Programme 2016-2018 • 20 March 2017: Workshop “Enjoyment of Cultural Heritage by means of new and old media” (Cyprus) • 1-2 June 2017: International Conference on social, cultural, political and economic value of cultural heritage (Portugal) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  19. Follow up Action Programme 2016-2018 • 28-29 September 2017: Workshop on the role of JPICH funded research on heritage practice (Lithuania) • October 2017: Call for Experts. Methodology development for assessing the cultural and socio-economic value(s) of digital cultural heritage (Spain) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  20. CH Governance Strategies • International conference within EYCH • 4-5 October 2018 • ‘Building with communities’: participatory governance of cultural heritage • Focus on built heritage / physical environment • Establish a community; yearly conferences • In collaboration with JPICH partners, NGO’s/IGO’s (e.g. EHHF) ‘ JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  21. Task 2.4 Case studies (SNHB, AHRC) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  22. Task 2.4 Case studies (SNHB, AHRC) • The aim of this task is both to demonstrate the potential value of cultural and natural heritage to society, so that it is understood and included in the development of more sustainable societies, but also to show what impact this selected research has had in society. • The knowledge of how heritage impacts on major societal challenges i.e. sustainability will be communicated primarily to social policymakers and heritage practitioners in general, so as to inform future decision making and future research. • This task will identify, collate and showcase research that demonstrates a direct impact from heritage on the challenges identified in the SRA and make evident the societal, economic and environmental impacts of heritage. JHEP 2 WP 2 Cyprus June 2017

  23. Task 2.4 Case studies (SNHB, AHRC) • SNHB and AHRC have set up an online survey and questionnaire and these was sent to SC for comments • Summary of the research • Summary of impact • Impact checklist • Evidence of impact • 6 responses received • Instructions, survey and questionnaire will be reviewed before sending them to JPI partners to collate cases. JHEP 2 WP 2 Cyprus June 2017

  24. Task 2.5 Knowledge Hub (ANCSI) JHEP 2 WP 2, Rome (Italy), November 2017

  25. Task 2.5 Knowledge Hub (MCI) • Overall aim: challenge the potential of the Heritage Portal to turning it out in a Digital Knowledge Hub • Deliverable: Scoping study on Knowledge Hub CH Portal • Deadline - Month 24, December 2017 JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

  26. Progress over the period July-November 2017 • Principal chapters from proposed layout • Vision • System architecture • Data content and its accessibility • Customers • Global visibility and sustainability • Cost–benefit analysis of the Knowledge Hub JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

  27. Progress over the period July-November 2017 VISION Create a Cultural Heritage platform to establish and disseminate the best practices and shape the research agenda. It will provide input to EU, national and local policymakers, and screening initiatives inside and outside the EU. Among the core functions of the KH-CH is to play the role of knowledge hub for effective cultural/research heritage cooperation. Knowledge generation: Through JPI deliverables; analytical work reflecting on results and lessons from implementation of various policy initiatives at national and local level (produced by governments and/or universities and research institutions). Knowledge management: A knowledge management interface through an adequate knowledge management architecture which facilitates translation and distilling of specific knowledge addressing curators at regional and national level, staff with specific responsibilities, various stakeholders. Knowledge sharing: Creating knowledge sharing tools and mechanisms like as: (i) creating a database-management system to organise knowledge generated from JPI participatory stakeholders (formally organized or informally) so that they can be easily retrieved; (ii) creating a dedicated social media spaces that shows the work of JPI’s that is innovative, generate new knowledge and whose lessons can be showcased during events (e.g. Twitter). JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

  28. Progress over the period July-November 2017 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE (What’s new?) In terms of architecture development, the following steps will be followed, along with the specific tools: • Ontology definition. This step accounts for the ontology as a classification scheme in the proposed knowledge domain. We built the ontology using an editing tool (here Protege), that stores the internal representation of the graphical UML model in one of the possible ontology languages, like RDF or OWL. Next, the conceptual model exported in a RDF file will be imported in a wiki type product (we proposed DataWiki). Once the model is imported into the wiki, the wiki engine allows a graphical view of the ontology: • Concept definition as DataWiki categories; • Definition of relationships between concepts as DataWiki properties; • Ontology implementation using Protégé ontology editor • Importing the ontology through an RDF/OWL transformation in DataWiki • Creation of instances in DataWiki (as wiki pages) • Knowledge retrieving. Thus step accounts for the ontology exploitation to process data from the database, that means query definition and execution using “Query Interface” in DataWiki. JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

  29. Progress over the period July-November 2017 DATA CONTENT AND ITS ACCESSIBILITY (What’s new ?) • Re-fresh and re-upload the knowledge produced internally within JPEH and JPEH2 • Links to the major European infrastructures and programmes in close correlation with Cultural Heritage Science. Examples: ACCTRESS, E-RIHS, CoopernicusProgramme (de pus link-ul sub ele) • Links to other JPIs: JPI FACCE, JPI CLIMATE, JPI URBAN, JPI OCEANS, BiodivERsA • The Knowledge Portal should be also a credential source in spreading out knowledge about innovative solutions for creative industry and not only. • Advanced technology for cultural heritage integration: selection of the “best practices” from the completed projects and those of the futures joint calls Digitisation (looking into the future) • Periodic updating on major initiatives and policy developments in the CH digitization sector (i.e standards for digitization) an pointing out respective links • Link toEuropeana portal as reference point for Europe's online cultural heritage Cultural heritage and smart cities (looking into the future) • Screening of the progress on regional an European level about the role of CH into the sustainable urban development (i.e. integration of migrants and preservation of cultural identity), issue not still appropriately considered so far. JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

  30. Progress over the period July-November 2017 CUSTOMERS (What’s new?) The culturale heritage portal will suport the research actions and initiatives for cultural heritage preservation,valorification and recognition as european identity value. Objective: provide a platform for knowledge exchange and learning on effective CH cooperation at all levels • enable users to access multiple and adequate data sources • create a culture of collaborative practice development • interactivity with government/administration in CH sectors Categories of audiences Researchers, Institutions, Associations Cultural Organisations: Museums, Galleries and other Cultural Institutions Industry representatives: Professional Organisations, SMEs in creative industries Government Representatives at European and International Level Community Groups and Heritage Interest Groups, NGOs International Organisations European Initiatives, Networks, Technology Platforms and Online Communities JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

  31. Progress over the period July-November 2017 • GLOBAL VISIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY (What’s new?) • Objective: Explore the availability of knowledge portals hosted in Europe and worldwide with good quality material that might be suitable for linkage into a Global Online Knowledge Hubs • Integration of the HePo in an outstanding global networks representative for Cultural World Heritage • Creating synergies with advanced economies USA, Japan, together with Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and neighbouring Mediterranean countries • China Cultural heritage has also been identified as one of the three priority areas of cooperation in the 2012 EU-China Joint Declaration on cultural cooperation. • India The preservation (and digitisation) of cultural heritage has been set as the priority of the Policy dialogue on culture with India. • Brazil Cultural heritage is one of the priority areas of the Joint Programme on Culture between the European Commission and the Ministry of Culture of Brazil (2011-2014). JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

  32. Progress over the period July-November 2017 COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF THE KNOWLEDGE HUB Creation: development time horizon 3 months Personnel cost: aprox. 5.000 Eur Personnel effort: 0.5 PM data base/ cloud or local repository set-up 1.0 PM architecture system developer 0.5 PM interface web, visualization features, friendly intercativity mechanisms for users 1.0 PM data selection and uploading Maintenance: Data posting and management: 0.2 PM Infrastructure periodical check: 0.1 PM JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

  33. Still work to be done on: • System architecture • Cost-benefit analysis of the knowledge hub Adjustment of information on the rest of chapters in relation to the final proposed architecture and the personnel required for the maintenance JHEP 2 WP 2 Rome, 28-29 November 2017

More Related