the paradox of tolerance n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The Paradox of Tolerance PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The Paradox of Tolerance

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 8

The Paradox of Tolerance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

The Paradox of Tolerance. Michael Lacewing Tolerance. We can only tolerate practices, values, and beliefs of other people when these differ from our own.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Paradox of Tolerance' - markku

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the paradox of tolerance

The Paradox of Tolerance

Michael Lacewing

  • We can only tolerate practices, values, and beliefs of other people when these differ from our own.
  • Not minding or caring isn’t really tolerance, which involves not acting (in certain ways) on one’s opposition to the practice etc.
  • Restraint is not out of fear or powerlessness.
can racists be tolerant
Can racists be tolerant?
  • If tolerance is just not acting on disapproval, then racists can be tolerant.
  • One’s disapproval must not be based on ‘mere prejudice’, but e.g. on ‘responsible judgment’ or being ‘reasonable’
    • But is there a neutral account of what is ‘reasonable’?
  • Tolerance as a virtue: one’s restraint is for the right moral or political reasons
tensions psychological
Tensions: psychological
  • What reason can there be to tolerate what you think is wrong?
  • If you think it is morally right to show restraint, are you still morally opposed to the other view?
tensions political
Tensions: political
  • Should a liberal society tolerate a minority culture that doesn’t respect its values?
    • It rejects the values of individual autonomy and tolerance in favour of the authority of tradition, and seeks to enforce its values within the cultural community.
    • If it were the majority culture, it would advocate legal and social sanctions against those who disagreed.
  • Can, or should, liberals tolerate the intolerant or intolerable?
  • Tolerance is most needed when one view rejects tolerance. If both agree that individual autonomy must be respected, little tolerance is needed.
  • If the reason for tolerance is to respect autonomy, why would we tolerate a view that did not respect autonomy? Don’t we increase autonomy by not tolerating views that do not respect autonomy?
  • But if a liberal society could only tolerate cultures that accept liberal values, how would this be tolerance at all?
defending tolerance
Defending tolerance
  • To argue that intolerant views cannot be tolerated is not intolerance. E.g. it is quite different from the intolerance of a view that tries to impose a specific way of living on people.
  • We cannot refuse to make any value judgment about different cultures or we lose the value judgments that favour tolerance over intolerance.
why be tolerant
Why be tolerant?
  • Strife
  • Fallibility
  • Autonomy
    • As happiness
    • As respect for equality
  • Diversity