1 / 8

EFET ’s views on TSO revenue setting

EFET's views on TSO revenue setting and the benefits of transparency in tariff setting. Examines the importance of understanding price control parameters and the need for assurance for both TSOs and shippers. Highlights the benefits arising from ACER's report and suggests ways to improve future price control decisions.

marki
Download Presentation

EFET ’s views on TSO revenue setting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ACER Stakeholder Event on Methdologies and Parameters to DetermineGas TSO Revenues 8February 2018, Brussels EFET’sviews on TSO revenue setting Steve Rose Chair of the EFET Tariffs WG

  2. Transparency builds trust in tariff setting • Revenuesettingmechanisms • Benefits arising from ACER’s report • Conclusions Contents

  3. Transparency builds trust in tariff setting • Article 30 of the TAR NC is there for a reason • Understanding of the relevant price control parameters • Price control parameters→allowed revenue →tariffs • Comparison of relative TSO efficiency • Visibility of under/over recovery • Exposure of any hidden cross subsidy, RAB re-evaluation or inefficiency

  4. Transparency builds trust in tariff setting (2) • Review of Article 30 information – a “mixed bag” • No information yet for some countries • Differing degrees of completeness • Differing degrees of granularity • Differing interpretation of parameters • Differing degrees of accessibility • No useful information for price capped TSOs • No tariff models yet for some countries • Differing degrees of user input into tariff models • Not all of the supporting information is available in English

  5. Revenue setting mechanisms • Shippers are not able to decide which form of price control is appropriate for individual TSOs • TSOs need assurance that their operations will be properly remunerated and financeable • but • Shippers need assurance that tariffs reflect efficiently incurred costs • Preference is for “allowed revenues” and proportionate incentives which motivate TSOs to outperform and respond to shipper needs

  6. Benefits arising from ACER’s report • ACER shoud not strive for a single harmonised price control methodology across the EU • Instead the report should: • Highlight best practices • Point out possible material inefficiencies • Develop common metrics for crude benchmarking of relative TSO efficiency • NRAs should reflect on the report and use it to refine their future price control decisions

  7. Conclusions • TAR NC represents the beginning of the process of creating trust in tariff setting • Initial analysis of Article 30 information shows that more still needs to be done • Shippers must be able to make a meaningful link between price control parameters→allowed revenue→tariffs • TSOs need assurance that their operations will be properly remunerated and financeable

  8. secretariat@efet.org www.efet.org Thanks for listening

More Related