420 likes | 681 Views
Project Lazarus - Mission Statement. Project Lazarus provides expertise in managing a community-based educational and interventional program thatintends to reduce deaths among patients that are at increased riskfrom abusing or misusing narcotics and dying from an accidental poisoning (unin
E N D
1. 1
2. Project Lazarus - Mission Statement
Project Lazarus provides expertise in managing a community-based educational and interventional program that intends to reduce deaths among patients that are at increased risk from abusing or misusing narcotics and dying from an accidental poisoning (unintentional drug overdose). 2
3. Designing Project Lazarus 3
4. LOCUS OF RURAL INTERVENTIONS
4
5. Step 1. Community awareness and coalition building
Community organizers must know their communities.
Communities must be made aware they have a problem, and
Communities must be allowed to help formulate a response before they’ll support changes to the status quo. 5
6. 6 Substance Abuse Task Force Goals
Increase community awareness
Develop resource guide for treatment
Identify barriers to prevention and treatment programs
Identify gaps in available prevention and treatment programs
Coordinate community efforts in response to problems of domestic violence, child abuse, automobile accidents, illness and death from substance abuse of alcohol, tobacco and drugs.
7. Wilkes coalitions working with Project Lazarus 7
8. 8
9. Designing Project Lazarus 9
11. Step 2. Epidemiologic Surveillance Broad spectrum of data on fatal and non-fatal overdoses
Mortality
Vital records
Medical Examiner system
Non-fatal overdoses
Emergency Department
Data on prescribing of controlled substances
Practitioner access to patient prescribing profiles
Public health access to anonymized data
Global and local data
Historical trends
Current findings 11
12. Unintentional and undetermined intent poisoning mortality rates: NC, Wilkes County, 2003-2009 12 Since 2003, state fatal unintentional/undetermined intent poisoning rates (in blue) have increased in a stepwise fashion. Wilkes County rates, except in 2004, are at least 3 times higher than the state rates, and are currently among the top five county unintentional poisoning mortality rates in the country. Surry County saw in increase in poisoning mortality rates between 2003 (2 deaths) and 2006 (15 deaths). Unintentional/ undetermined poisoning mortality rates decreased in 2007 (based on 9 deaths) and rose again slightly in 2008 (10 deaths). Rates based on statistically small numbers, as has occurred in Surry County, must be interpreted with caution. However, since a reasonable number of deaths from poisonings should be zero, the number of deaths greater than one should be of concern, even though statistically small. The linear trend for Surry indicates a slow, but upward trend in mortality from preventable poisonings.Since 2003, state fatal unintentional/undetermined intent poisoning rates (in blue) have increased in a stepwise fashion. Wilkes County rates, except in 2004, are at least 3 times higher than the state rates, and are currently among the top five county unintentional poisoning mortality rates in the country. Surry County saw in increase in poisoning mortality rates between 2003 (2 deaths) and 2006 (15 deaths). Unintentional/ undetermined poisoning mortality rates decreased in 2007 (based on 9 deaths) and rose again slightly in 2008 (10 deaths). Rates based on statistically small numbers, as has occurred in Surry County, must be interpreted with caution. However, since a reasonable number of deaths from poisonings should be zero, the number of deaths greater than one should be of concern, even though statistically small. The linear trend for Surry indicates a slow, but upward trend in mortality from preventable poisonings.
13. 13 Unintentional deaths from poisonings, primarily due to drug overdoses, do not occur equally across our state. The counties with the highest mortality rates from unintentional poisonings are shown in the darkest shade of red. There are more counties with fatal drug overdoses in the western part of NC than in the piedmont or the eastern regions. Mitchell, Swain and Wilkes on this map have the highest rates.
Unintentional deaths from poisonings, primarily due to drug overdoses, do not occur equally across our state. The counties with the highest mortality rates from unintentional poisonings are shown in the darkest shade of red. There are more counties with fatal drug overdoses in the western part of NC than in the piedmont or the eastern regions. Mitchell, Swain and Wilkes on this map have the highest rates.
14. Unintentional and undetermined intent poisoning mortality rates/100,000 population: Western NC Counties, 2008 Supported by Purdue Pharma L.P., Grant # NED101356 Prepared by Kay Sanford, September 2009,
Revised January 2010 14 1. Poisoning rates calculated as deaths/100,000 pop., estimated from OSBM, April 2009 estimates. NC pop = 9,227,016 residents.
2. Mortality rates based on less than 10 deaths are statistically unstable and patterns may reflect random and not real changes. The following counties had less than 10 deaths in 2008: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Cherokee, Graham, Haywood, Madison, McDowell, Polk, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga and Yancey.
3. 2008 state unintentional/undetermined intent poisoning rate = 11.5.
2008 Western NC unintentional/undetermined intent poisoning rate = 18.2
4. The counties with the top 5 highest mortality rates in Western NC counties in 2008 are McDowell (29.2), Mitchell (37.4), Rutherford (39.9), Swain (42.9) and Wilkes (41.6).
1. Poisoning rates calculated as deaths/100,000 pop., estimated from OSBM, April 2009 estimates. NC pop = 9,227,016 residents.
2. Mortality rates based on less than 10 deaths are statistically unstable and patterns may reflect random and not real changes. The following counties had less than 10 deaths in 2008: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Cherokee, Graham, Haywood, Madison, McDowell, Polk, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga and Yancey.
3. 2008 state unintentional/undetermined intent poisoning rate = 11.5.
2008 Western NC unintentional/undetermined intent poisoning rate = 18.2
4. The counties with the top 5 highest mortality rates in Western NC counties in 2008 are McDowell (29.2), Mitchell (37.4), Rutherford (39.9), Swain (42.9) and Wilkes (41.6).
15. 15
16. Dispensed outpatient prescriptions for controlled substances rates/10,000 population: Western NC Counties, 2008 16 1. Prescription rates calculated as dispensed scripts/10,000 pop., estimated from OSBM, April 2009 estimates. NC pop = 9,227,016 residents. Prescription data from NC-CSRS, reported as of March 2009.
2. 2008 state outpatient prescriptions for controlled substances rate =17,522 scripts/10,000 population. Western NC rates for 2008 were 21,178 scripts per 10,000 population.
3. The top five counties in western NC counties with the highest prescription rates/10,000 pop in 2008 were Cherokee (25800), Haywood (22819), McDowell (23786), Swain (23681), and Wilkes (27384).
1. Prescription rates calculated as dispensed scripts/10,000 pop., estimated from OSBM, April 2009 estimates. NC pop = 9,227,016 residents. Prescription data from NC-CSRS, reported as of March 2009.
2. 2008 state outpatient prescriptions for controlled substances rate =17,522 scripts/10,000 population. Western NC rates for 2008 were 21,178 scripts per 10,000 population.
3. The top five counties in western NC counties with the highest prescription rates/10,000 pop in 2008 were Cherokee (25800), Haywood (22819), McDowell (23786), Swain (23681), and Wilkes (27384).
17. Top 10 Controlled Substances Outpatient Dispensing Rates: NC, 2008-2009* 2008 controlled substances Script rate/10,000 pop . 2009 controlled substances script rate/10,000 pop . 17
18. Comparison of substances causing fatal overdoses and outpatient dispensed controlled substances, North Carolina, 2008 Mortality data Controlled substances data 18
20. 20 The highest outpatient prescribing rates of controlled substances were in rural –not counties, predominantly in the western part of the state, along the eastern seaboard and in the southeastern corner next to South Carolina. Wilkes county rates are in the highest quartile; Surry in the second highest quartile.The highest outpatient prescribing rates of controlled substances were in rural –not counties, predominantly in the western part of the state, along the eastern seaboard and in the southeastern corner next to South Carolina. Wilkes county rates are in the highest quartile; Surry in the second highest quartile.
21. NC out-patient controlled substances prescription dispensing and accidental poisoning mortality rates by county 21
22. Where Pain Relievers Were Obtained Non-medical Use among Past Year Users Aged 12 or Older 2006 22 ## So if mostly from friends why should the Board worry ? #### So if mostly from friends why should the Board worry ? ##
23. Designing Project Lazarus 23
24. Chronic Pain Initiative Programs
Northwest Community Care Network (Medicaid) -- 6 County program
Physician toolkit on pain and opioids
Pharmacy home
Case management for pain patients and ED
Restricted ED narcotics policy
Use of controlled substance reporting system
Support group for pain patients
Mental health collaboration
Promoting drug treatment and buprenorphine
Community education 24
25. Step 3. Prevention Chronic Pain Initiative Goals
Decrease ED utilization for chronic pain
Decrease multiple prescribers and pharmacies
Establish PCP and pharmacy homes
Create alert system (policy initiative)
Improve PCP chronic pain management
Encourage pain clinic referrals
Encourage co-management model for partnership with pain clinic
25
26. GOALS of Chronic Pain Initiative continued
Reduce number of accidental poisonings
Develop a reproducible, comprehensive approach to chronic pain management that may be duplicated by other Networks.
Decrease costs 26
27. Wilkes County Chronic Pain InitiativeEVALUATION Doug Easterling
Y. Montez Lane
Jessica Richardson
28. Summary: Key Findings A community coalition in Wilkes County, North Carolina developed a Physician Tool Kit containing a model “Pain Agreement” and other “tools” that providers can use to improve the management of patients with chronic pain (e.g., algorithm for assessing and managing pain, format for progress notes, medication flowsheet).
To promote uptake of the Toolkit, the Wilkes County Medical Director has to date met personally with providers in 15 of the 46 medical practices in the county.
This study involved interviews with 14 providers (physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners) from 9 different practices who were introduced to the Toolkit prior to January 2009.
12 of the 14 providers interviewed for the study reported that they use a Pain Contract. Four of these providers began using Pain Agreements after being oriented to the Physician Toolkit. Other providers who had already been using Pain Agreements reported that they were now using them more frequently with chronic pain patients. The median provider uses the Agreement with 20 patients per month.
Providers exposed to the Toolkit also reported more regular monitoring of the Controlled Substances Reporting System (CSRS).
Providers reported only modest use of tools other than the Pain Agreement (e.g., progress notes, guidelines for writing scripts for pain medication, patient education materials)
Providers report that the Pain Agreement and other tools have led to clearer, more direct, and more comfortable interactions with patients, while also making it easier to stop prescribing opioids when the Agreement is violated.
The number of death from prescription drug overdose has decreased slightly in Wilkes County since first of year. A larger change is that overdose deaths are now much more likely to result from prescriptions written by providers outside the county.
29. Provider Perceptions of Patient Change Comments:
“Patients are more satisfied because the feel they're validated having pain. If adhering to the contract, don't have to feel guilty asking for pain meds.”
“Patients seem happier since they're given the boundaries up front. More satisfied by knowing what to expect.”
“Patients are made to be more honest about the issue once it's documented.”
“Improved perceptions among patients of how they need to contribute to their own plan/contract. “
“Patients realize contract is binding and cannot veer from it.”
30. Wilkes County NC 2009 Overdoses 30 Deaths (actual, 31)
23 had prescription history
7 had no prescription history
17 had prescriptions from out of county MD
75% 2009 versus 18% 2008
6 had prescriptions from in county MD
(First half of year)
23 had prescription within two weeks that was related to death
7 had no relation to death
31. Overdoses cont. 19 Males/12 Females; Average age 39
16 Oxycodone
2 Hydrocodone
2 Fentanyl
5 Methadone
1 Mixed
1 Morphine
1 Heroin
2 Alcohol
32. Designing Project Lazarus 32
34. Step 4. Rescue Project Lazarus
Prevention efforts -- not always sufficient.
Rescue is a proactive response to the failures of drug overdose prevention
Rescue focuses on
changing the practice of medicine (prescribing of an antidote for opioid-induced respiratory depression)
educating people to be better patients
changing community attitudes towards the misuse and abuse of opioids.
Access to Treatment 34
35. The antidote to fatal respiratory depression: Naloxone HCL (Narcan®) Mu-opioid receptor antagonist
Can’t get high from it
Decades of experience
Uses: anesthesia & emergency
Quick acting, works 30-90 minutes.
Generic (cheap?)
Delivered via injection (IM, SC, IV) or nasal
35
36. NC Medical Board Statement “The goals of Project Lazarus are consistent with the Board’s statutory mission to protect the people of North Carolina.
The Board therefore encourages its licensees to abide by the protocols employed by Project Lazarus and to cooperate with the program’s efforts to make naloxone available to persons at risk of suffering drug overdose.”
36
37. Designing Project Lazarus 37
38. Step 5. Evaluation of Project Lazarus Process
Simplicity in clinical setting and community
Flexibility to clinicians and participants
Data quality from pilot, vital records, CSRS
Acceptability – LMDs and participants
Representativeness of participants vs. decedents
Timeliness of responses to LMDs and participants
Monitoring changes of ED narcotics policies
Availability/use of Buprenorphine and other substance abuse treatment 38
39. Project Lazarus Evaluation, cont.
Outcome – surveillance and participant follow-up
Accidental poisoning deaths
ED visits for substance abuse and poisoning
Project Lazarus interviews every 3 months
Project Lazarus opioid overdoses
Project Lazarus uses of naloxone rescue kit
Participant lives saved
Prescriptions for opioids in Wilkes Co.
Prescriptions for buprenorphine in Wilkes Co. 39
40. Project Lazarus Firsts First naloxone program in the South
First community based approach
First introduction into general medical practice
First focus on prescription drugs
First to focus on pain patients
First time approved by a medical board 40
41. What we’d like to do next… Permanent drug take-back site
Promote/give away lock boxes
Pharmacist CEUs on diversion and PMP
Continued physician CMEs
Broader regional coalitions
Military populations 41
42. Further Collaboration US Army: Operation OpioidSAFE
Womack Army Medical Center at Ft. Bragg, NC
Project Lazarus model
Pain clinic and general practice doctors
Naloxone rescue, patient and peer education
American Pain Foundation (APF): PainSAFE
Education regarding opioid prescribing
Disposal information
Naloxone rescue medication
Western North Carolina
MAHEC
42
43. Contact Information 336.667.8100
Fred Wells Brason II, President/CEO
fbrason@projectlazarus.org
Nabarun Dasgupta, MPH VP Policy
nab@email.unc.edu
Kay Sanford, MSPH VP Research and Evaluation
kay.sanford@gmail.com
Su Albert, MD, VP Medical Director
salbert@wilkescounty.net
43