1 / 66

Chapter 12

Controller Design ( to determine controller settings for P, PI or PID controllers ) Based on Transient Response Criteria. Chapter 12. Desirable Controller Features The closed-loop system must be stable. The effects of disturbances are minimized, i.e., good disturbance rejection.

Download Presentation

Chapter 12

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Controller Design (todetermine controller settings for P, PI or PID controllers) Based on Transient Response Criteria Chapter 12

  2. Desirable Controller Features • The closed-loop system must be stable. • The effects of disturbances are minimized, i.e., good disturbance rejection. • Quick and smooth responses to the set-point changes are guaranteed, i.e., good set-point tracking. • Off-set is eliminated. • Excessive controller action is avoided. • The control system is robust, i.e., it is insensitive to changes in operating conditions and to inaccuracies in process model and/or measurements. Chapter 12

  3. Chapter 12

  4. Simplified Block Diagram

  5. Simplified Block Diagram D(s) B(s) P(s)

  6. Example

  7. Chapter 12

  8. Example 12.1

  9. Chapter 12

  10. Chapter 12

  11. Alternatives for Controller Design • Direct synthesis (DS) method • Internal model control (IMC) method • Controller tuning relations • Frequency response techniques • Computer simulation • On-line tuning after the control system is installed. Chapter 12

  12. Direct Synthesis

  13. Direct Synthesis Steps • Specify desired closed-loop response (transfer function) • Assume process model • Solve for controller transfer function

  14. Direct Synthesis to Achieve Perfect Control

  15. Direct Synthesis to Achieve Finite Settling Time

  16. Example

  17. Example

  18. Direct Synthesis for Time-Delayed Systems

  19. Taylor Series Approximation

  20. Example 1

  21. Example 2

  22. Pade Approximation

  23. Example

  24. Example 12.1 Use the DS design method to calculate PID controller settings for the process: Chapter 12

  25. Consider three values of the desired closed-loop time constant: . Evaluate the controllers for unit step changes in both the set point and the disturbance, assuming that Gd = G. Repeat the evaluation for two cases: • The process model is perfect ( = G). • The model gain is = 0.9, instead of the actual value, K = 2. Thus, Chapter 12 The controller settings for this example are:

  26. Chapter 12 Figure 12.3 Simulation results for Example 12.1 (a): correct model gain.

  27. Simulation results for Example 21.1(b): incorrect model gain.

  28. Chapter 12

  29. PID vs. IMC

  30. PID Controller Design Procedure Based on IMC Method –Step 1: factor process model

  31. PID Controller Design Procedure Based on IMC Method –Step 2: derive IMC transfer function

  32. PID Controller Design Procedure Based on IMC Method –Step 3: derive PID transfer function

  33. Chapter 12

  34. Example

  35. Controller Synthesis Criteria in Time Domain Time-domain techniques can be classified into two groups: (a) Criteria based on a few points in the response (b) Criteria based on the entire response, or integral criteria

  36. Approach (a) Based on settling time, % overshoot, rise time, decay ratio (Fig. 5.10 can be viewed as closed-loop response). Several methods based on 1/4 decay ratio have been proposed, e.g., Cohen-Coon and Ziegler-Nichols.

  37. Chapter 12

  38. Chapter 12

  39. Approach (b) - Criteria • Integral of absolute value of error (IAE) • Integral of square error (ISE) • Time-weighted IAE (ITAE)

  40. Approach (b) - Remarks Pick controller parameters to minimize integral. • IAE allows larger overall deviation than ISE (with smaller overshoots). • ISE needs longer settling time • ITAE weights errors occurring later more heavily Approximate optimum tuning parameters are correlated with K, ,  (Table 12.3).

  41. Chapter 12

  42. Chapter 12

  43. Example 1

  44. Example 1

  45. Example 2

  46. Chapter 12

More Related