1 / 7

Enhancing NATO COP Efficiency with Shared Mental Images & Rapid Decision-Making Framework

Explore the importance of shared mental images for NATO COP and the need for rapid decision-making frameworks. Discover key strategies like fusion vs synthesis, anomaly detection, and reducing mental transformations.

magnar
Download Presentation

Enhancing NATO COP Efficiency with Shared Mental Images & Rapid Decision-Making Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary Random shots whilst shaving

  2. COP • COP – Shared mental image vs mental images of shared data & presentation. • User’s perspective— • Need common framework for NATO COP • Need 70% solution NOW. • Directed telescope & drill down

  3. Fusion & Filtering vs Anomalies • Commanders live on anomalies & outliers • Emergence, disconfirm assumptions, outside expectations • Fusion vs Synthesis • Raw COP vs Filtered COP • Filtering vs Clutter Suppression • Change Detection vs what you now know that wasn’t so • Alerting • Display uncertainty with audit trail • Time to decide & time to resolve uncertainty Work in user’s decision space, not in data space

  4. The Importance of Speed • Commanders make decisions under risk – That’s their job. • Uncertainty, potential consequences, shortness of time raise stress. • Stress promotes tunnel vision, reducing options. • Rapid understanding, including ambiguities, promotes better decisions and earlier decisions. Work in the user’s decision space

  5. Take away thoughts • 2D vs 3D, exocentric vs egocentric – provide both • 3D from 2D --- SLAR to 3D • Pliable display techniques – retaining reference • Change detection – experts perform poorly, need assistance • Reduce mental transformations KISS • Network metrics & topology – infotheoretics • No mention of anastomatic networks • Network as a Battlespace to be visualized

  6. Your Challenge • User’s perspective— • Need common framework for NATO COP • Need 70% solution NOW. • What are YOU going to do about it? • Report what is possible in short term • Time to technology demo with local user • Time to prototype for field testing • Reject papers that fail to address these points. • Users influence paper selection

  7. “Saltbush” Bill Cunningham Agent Provocateur et Magouilleur Plots Plotted Scams Schemed Riot & Revolution at reasonable prices “No scheme is beneath our dignity.”

More Related