1 / 25

Enterprise Risk Management for Small Businesses

Enterprise Risk Management for Small Businesses. A presentation to IABA Annual Meeting by Jay Vadiveloo Lu Ma Jackie Bogensberger August 2011. Outline. Motivation for ERM for Small Businesses (ERMSB) initiative Why ERMSB does not exist?

Download Presentation

Enterprise Risk Management for Small Businesses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enterprise Risk Management for Small Businesses A presentation to IABA Annual Meeting by Jay Vadiveloo Lu Ma Jackie Bogensberger August 2011

  2. Outline • Motivation for ERM for Small Businesses (ERMSB) initiative • Why ERMSB does not exist? • Similarities and differences between ERM for large corporations and small businesses • ERMSB initiative at the Goldenson Center • Case study – Between Rounds Bagels • Student perspective on doing an ERMSB project • Where do we go from here? • Conclusion

  3. Motivation for ERMSB Initiative • Small business are the largest, fastest growing, and most important segment of the American economy • Small businesses experience one of the highest failure rates compared to large corporations in other industries • Lack of any institutional or fomalized risk management for small businesses

  4. Why ERMSB does not exist? • Small businesses are unwilling to pay for this service • May be financially unable to do so • May not recognize the potential benefit of ERM • Fear of change As a consequence, ERM principles and literature are tailored primarily to large corporations

  5. Similarities with ERM for large corporations • Fundamental steps are similar • Identify and prioritize risks • Model and quantify the risks • Create risk-mitigation strategies

  6. Differences with ERM for large corporations • Needs to incorporate business growth strategies as well • Need to focus on reasonably likely risks with serious consequences versus low likelihood events with serious consequences • Business owners are very knowledgeable about risks and business growth strategies • Easier to assess and manage risks of a small business, but consequences of a risk shock are far greater • Qualitative risks may be just as important as quantitative risks • ERM analysis covers a shorter time horizon (3 to 5 years) and should be revisited afterwards

  7. Differences with ERM for large corporations: continued A well defined ERM analysis which incorporates business growth strategies can materially improve the sustainability and profitability of a small business

  8. ERM Initiative at the Goldenson Center • In place for the past two years • Students funded by the Center to undertake ERMSB projects in the region • Service offered free-of-charge to small businesses • Students work in teams and provide a formal written ERM report and any software tools at the end of the project

  9. Risk Management Report for Between Rounds Bagels University of Connecticut Graduate Program in Actuarial Science: Lu Ma Jackie Bogensberger Eric Anderson Maura Bey

  10. Outline The Bagel Industry Background Recognition of Risks for Between Rounds Data Analysis Micro Level Macro Level Suggestions/Conclusions

  11. The Bagel Industry There are about 3,072 bagel shops at the 2007 census Operate at 11.4% profit margin

  12. Recognition of Risks Competition Bagel Stop Production Co, Bruegger’s Bagel Bakery and Lox Stock & Bagels, Inc, Dunkin’ Donuts Seasonal trends Trends due to the economy Cost efficient items Waste management Advertisement

  13. Data Analysis We used the information complied from Between Rounds’ register reports to create a user friendly pivot table (in Excel) In order to calculate the percent profit for each item, we assumed a 33% cost From there we looked at best selling items (contribute to 50% of profit) over a monthly and year basis

  14. Pivot Table

  15. Monthly and Year Best Sellers

  16. Gross Profit (per store) South Windsor/Vernon Most profitable year: 2006 Least profitable year:2009 South Windsor Monthly Profit 70,000.00 60,000.00 50,000.00 Gross Profit 40,000.00 30,000.00 20,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 • Overall down slope since 2006 • Economy has slowed • Less people eating out

  17. Gross Profit (per store) Manchester 2010 was most profitable and the store saw an overall increase in profit from 2006 to 2010 Notable: All three branches show lower numbers in January and February New Years resolutions Cold Weather Saving money after the holiday spending sprees

  18. Total Gross Profit for All Locations Manchester is the only growing branch Manchester is the smallest branch-Overall profit has decreased, but as has the economy • We see a positive outlook in 2010 in all stores • Check 2011 data to see if up turn continues

  19. Our Suggestions Bagel Promotions: advertise on the side of a vehicle, coffee promotion, healthy promotion during New Years Resolution Time Online Advertisement: Groupon, Facebook Drive Thru Menu: consider the potential for traffic, new menu items (based on best sellers)

  20. Our Suggestions (cont.) Data Collection: adjust your “family groups” to be more condensed or keep the names more consistent. Keep count on waste Strategizing to Appeal to other clientele: consider re-branding to appeal to younger customers/college students

  21. THANK YOU From all of us, thank you for allowing us to analyze your business. You have been more than cooperative and we appreciate it!!

  22. Student perspective on ERMSB initiative • Not your typical actuarial project • Forces students to think out-of-the-box since each ERMSB project is unique • Students work in a team and are involved from start to finish • Students work directly with the business owners • Final report, models and presentation done by students • Invaluable experience and immediate gratification of having recommendations implemented by owners

  23. Where do we go from here? • Need to expand the Center’s ERMSB initiative on a larger scale • Any large scale implementation should be supported by large corporations, private foundations and government agencies and not small business • Most cost effective way to do these projects is to engage students at universities all over the country • Goldenson Center could help facilitate and coordinate any large scale ERMSB initiative.

  24. Conclusion • The Goldenson Center has just scratched the surface in showing how an effective ERM culture can be created with small businesses • ERMSB is a form of micro risk management and can be replicated globally as well with funding from large corporations and other entities and university students doing the projects • Huge payoff since any reduction in the failure rate for small businesses would be a boost to the overall economy.

  25. Contact Information Jay Vadiveloo, Ph.D, FSA, MAAA, CFA Professor-in-Residence & Director Janet & Mark L. Goldenson Center for Actuarial Research, University of Connecticut & Senior Consultant Towers Watson vadiveloo@math.uconn.edu

More Related