ground and surface water interactions in karst terrains some observations from along the cody scarp
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Ground and surface water interactions in karst terrains: Some observations from along the Cody Scarp

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

Ground and surface water interactions in karst terrains: Some observations from along the Cody Scarp - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 69 Views
  • Uploaded on

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Ground and surface water interactions in karst terrains: Some observations from along the Cody Scarp' - maegan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
ground and surface water interactions in karst terrains some observations from along the cody scarp
Ground and surface water interactions in karst terrains:Some observations from along the Cody Scarp

Jon Martin

Liz Screaton, PJ Moore

Acknowledgements: NSF, DEP, SRWMD

O’Leno State Park, Ichetucknee State Park

Sheryl Gordon, Randy Dean, Brooke Sprouse, Jennifer Martin

slide2
How does flow in conduits and matrix interact?- What can be learned from chemistry of spring discharge?

Modified from White, 2002

slide3
Karst aquifers have two distinct ground water reservoirs:
    • Conduits (> 1 cm2)
    • Matrix (fracture and intergranular porosity)
      • Flow unimportant in low porosity matrix, e.g. Paleozoic aquifers
      • High porosity matrix important flow path and for storage, e.g. Floridan aquifer

Martin and Screaton, 2001

mill pond spring ichetucknee river
Mill Pond Spring, Ichetucknee River

~21 cm of rain

Dye return

Martin and Gordon, 1997

flow velocity two floods
Flow velocity, two “floods”
  • Velocity constant through conduits
  • Velocity depends on stage and discharge
  • Discharge can be used to determine conduit size
  • Determine residence time – chemical sampling
discharge at sink and rise evidence for conduit matrix exchange
2.2 million

m3 lost

1.1 million

m3 lost

19 million

m3 gained

Discharge at sink and rise:evidence for conduit-matrix exchange
slide12
Mixing: Ocala Ls and seawater + radiogenic Sr?Some wells have more Ocala Sr than othersRadiogenic Sr from Hawthorn Gp?

Modern Seawater

0.70917

0.7079Upper Ocala

slide13
222Rn Geochemistry

222Rn derived from decay of 238U

Alkaline earth element; easily fits in clay and carbonate mineral structures.

226Ra

t½ = ~1600 yrs

 Source of 222Rn to ground water.

222Rn

t½ = 3.8 days

 Loss from radioactive decay.

218Po

Noble gas; non-reactive in inorganic or organic reactions.

 Loss from evasion to atmosphere.

rn input and decay
Rn input and decay

10.53 masl

Excess

Rn

222Rnmeas.-222Rncalc.

9.78 masl

Rn

Deficit

~12.2 masl

Distance from sink (m)

N = 222Rn activity

N0 =initial 222Rn activity

l = decay constant

t = time

conclusions and questions
Conclusions and Questions
  • Water exchanges between conduits and matrix (T, physical models, Cl concentrations)
  • Several sources of recharged water from confined region (Sr and Rn isotopes)
  • What roles do diffuse recharge and epikarst have in flow in conduits and matrix?
ad