1 / 18

Do we need a direct sales force?

Do we need a direct sales force?. Jamestown Case assumptions and analysis The direct sales force vs. manufacturers’ reps. O’Brien’s Cost Assumptions. Structure assumptions: Sales force size Sales force growth of 20% and sales force size Span of control, number of managers

lynley
Download Presentation

Do we need a direct sales force?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Do we need a direct sales force? • Jamestown • Case assumptions and analysis • The direct sales force vs. manufacturers’ reps

  2. O’Brien’s Cost Assumptions • Structure assumptions: • Sales force size • Sales force growth of 20% and sales force size • Span of control, number of managers • Compensation assumptions: • Compensation level: level of experience; industry • Turnover rate=15%

  3. O’Brien’s Assumptions • Miscellaneous assumptions: • Rep commission rate 12%, not 10% • No growth in compensation or overhead as the sales force grows • No expenses for the sales manager • Doesn’t subtract start-up costs from savings • Does not include sales information system

  4. O’Brien’s Assumptions • Sales assumptions • Analysis

  5. What should she have done instead-Sales Force Size? • Breakdown method • N=forecasted sales volume/SP productivity • Causal direction problems • Workload method • N=total work required/expected work from SP • Total work required= f(# of accounts of each size, time required for calls, nonselling and travel time)

  6. What should she have done instead-Sales Force Size? • Incremental method • A salesperson should be added as long as the incremental profit produced by the additions exceeds the incremental costs

  7. Advantages of Reps • reps can afford to call on small accounts because they have multiple lines • high travel time between accounts is absorbed across multiple lines • there may be synergies across multiple lines • reps in the business for awhile tend to have both effort and ability

  8. Advantages of Reps • reps have established contacts, relationships • savings at lower level of sales (% of sales) relative to direct • sales expenses a direct function of sales volume

  9. Drawbacks of Reps • share of mind (many masters) • must bid for attention, sometimes too diversified • good reps are often taken (and there are lots of bad ones) • little control- lots of carrots, few sticks Sum: often highly efficient, but not always effective

  10. Use Reps When: • products are not overly complex • little company specific knowledge or training is required (low specific assets/investment) • products have a short selling cycle • selling requires no teamwork • output/outcome measures are easily available

  11. Use Reps When: • some territories are sparse, with high travel costs (that would be born by the rep) • many customers are small and may not warrant visits from a high-cost direct force • products are seasonal or volatile- environmental uncertainty

  12. Advantages of a Direct Sales Force • all their attention is devoted to your products • eventual savings as a percentage of sales (as sales grow) • greater control is possible • attention can be directed to particular accounts and/or activities and/or products • direct force may provide better feedback

  13. Drawbacks of Direct • heavy fixed costs- salesperson, managers, information systems • difficult to set up, slow to get up to speed • not easy to manage- benefits of control may not materialize Sum: can be very effective, if managed well- but good management is expensive

  14. Use Direct When: • after-sale service (e.g., training of customers) is important • the company desires a balance of effort among lines and wants to encourage selling high-margin and new products- behavior control more likely with direct sales force than with reps • team-selling is required or there is a long selling cycle

  15. Use Direct When: • sales and margins are high enough to support a direct force and cover fixed costs • the product line is broad, giving a direct force some of the synergy advantages a rep would have with multiple lines

  16. Sum, Rep vs. Direct: What to consider • How much behavioral control is needed • support/service • need for team selling • selling focus by product • length of the selling cycle • Product characteristics • complexity • size of the line

  17. Sum, Rep vs. Direct: What to consider • Salesperson characteristics • knowledge/expertise • risk averse/risk-seeking • Environmental Factors • quantity and predictability of sales • size of accounts, dispersion of accounts

  18. Relationship to Control Systems Low Control High Control Mfr. Reps Direct with commission, low supervision Direct with salary, high supervision

More Related