1 / 18

Do Separate Employers Provide a Better Workplace than the T.B.? Evidence from the 2008 PSES

Do Separate Employers Provide a Better Workplace than the T.B.? Evidence from the 2008 PSES. Tawfik Said (tsaid@pipsc.ca) Research Section, PIPSC August 23 rd , 2010. Presentation Outline. Study objectives Methodology Results Conclusion. Study Objectives.

lyneth
Download Presentation

Do Separate Employers Provide a Better Workplace than the T.B.? Evidence from the 2008 PSES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Do Separate Employers Provide a Better Workplace than the T.B.?Evidence from the 2008 PSES Tawfik Said (tsaid@pipsc.ca) Research Section, PIPSC August 23rd , 2010.

  2. Presentation Outline • Study objectives • Methodology • Results • Conclusion

  3. Study Objectives • Recent trend: Increased decentralization. • Emergent corporate model in the federal public service. • Policy implications: union position regarding decentralization.

  4. Methodology • 2008 PSES covered both TB and separate employers with a response rate of 65%. • Sample: 162 work units. • TB: Departments of Finance, Justice, Health, Transport, Natural Resources… • Separate employers: CFIA, CRA, NRC, OSFI, NEB, NC Commission… • Statistical analysis: Analysis of Variance & Multiple Linear Regression.

  5. Issues Studied • Leadership • Trust in senior managers • Top/Down information sharing • Workplace Ethics • Harassment • Discrimination • Workload, training, and career progress • Workload satisfaction • Satisfaction with training • Satisfaction with career progress

  6. The issue studied; object of comparison. Factor having a positive impact, increases the studied issue. Factor having a negative impact, decreases the studied issue. Factor having no significant impact on the issue. Existence of a significant relationship. No significant relationship exists. LEGEND

  7. Leadership

  8. Decentralization (**) NCR location Trust in senior managers Work Unit Size Science-Based Work Unit (**)

  9. Decentralization (**) NCR location Information sharing Work Unit Size Science-Based Work Unit (**)

  10. Workplace Ethics(Harassment & Discrimination)

  11. Decentralization (**) Trust in senior Mgt. Info. Sharing (**) Harassment NCR location (**) Work Unit Size Science-based (***)

  12. Decentralization (**) Trust in senior Mgt (*) Info. Sharing (**) Discrimination NCR location (**) Work Unit Size Science-based (***)

  13. Workload, training, and career progress

  14. Decentralization (**) Trust in senior Mgt Info. Sharing Satisfaction with Workload NCR location Work Unit Size Science-based

  15. Decentralization (**) Trust in senior Mgt Info. Sharing (***) Satisfaction with Training NCR location Work Unit Size (**) Science-based (**)

  16. Decentralization (*) Trust in senior Mgt Info. Sharing Career Progress Satisfaction NCR location (**) Work Unit Size Science-based (*)

  17. Results Summary • TB employees are more likely to be ; • satisfied with their career progress. • satisfied with their workload. • satisfied with the training they get. • SE employees are: • Less likely to be victim of harassment at work. • More satisfied with their senior managers and with top/down information sharing. • No significant differences exist between TB and SE in; • Discrimination at work.

  18. Thank you !!!Any Questions??

More Related