1 / 27

Psychology 10

Psychology 10. Analysis of Psychological Data February 24, 2014. Katie Coburn. Jack is in Washington DC reviewing grants; back on Wednesday. The Plan for Today. Introducing Z scores. Random variables and probability distributions. What is probability, anyway? The law of large numbers.

lyndon
Download Presentation

Psychology 10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Psychology 10 Analysis of Psychological Data February 24, 2014

  2. Katie Coburn • Jack is in Washington DC reviewing grants; back on Wednesday.

  3. The Plan for Today • Introducing Z scores. • Random variables and probability distributions. • What is probability, anyway? • The law of large numbers. • The frequentist approach to probability.

  4. Z scores • Sometimes a special linear transformation of the form Z = (X – M) / s will be particularly useful. • Is that really a linear transformation? • Z = -M / s + (1 / s) X . • a = - M / s b = 1 / s • Yes, that’s linear.

  5. Apply the rules for change under linear transformation • Z = -M / s + (1 / s) X . • MZ = -M / s + (1 / s) M = 0. • sZ = (1 / s) s = 1. • So the Z transformation of any variable will have a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one. • This is sometimes called “putting the variable in standard form.”

  6. Characteristics of Z scores • The sign of the Z score tells us whether the score is above or below the mean of the distribution. • The magnitude of the Z score tells us how far above or below, in standard deviation units. • For example, a Z score of -0.4 represents an individual score that is four tenths of a standard deviation below the mean.

  7. Comparisons using Z scores • Because the Z score is scale free, it can help us compare variables that are reported in different metrics. • Tonight’s in-class exercise illustrates that process.

  8. Activity • 40 people took exam 1. Your score was 80. • S X = 3,160, and S X2 = 252,136. • 35 people took exam 2. Your score was 68. • S X = 2,240, and S X2 = 146,760. • Which of your exam scores represents better performance relative to the rest of the class?

  9. More about Z scores • Recall that a Z score “standardizes” any variable; that is, it changes the scale so that the mean is zero and the standard deviation is one. • The Z score does not change any other aspect of the shape of a distribution. • Z = (X – M) / s. (Or, for a population, Z = (X – m) / s ).

  10. Things we know about Z scores • The sign tells us the position of an original score compared to the mean of the distribution: • Positive Z score: above the mean; • Negative Z score: below the mean. • The magnitude tells us how many standard deviations away from the mean the original score was.

  11. Uses for Z scores • We just saw that Z scores are useful when we need to compare variables that are measured differently. • In our class exercise, we saw that a score of 68 on one test was actually better than a score of 80 on another.

  12. Uses for Z scores • Another use of Z scores is for changing a variable to a new metric with some other mean and standard deviation. • Procedure: • First, standardize the variable (calculate a Z score). • Then multiply by the desired standard deviation and add the desired mean.

  13. An example of metric change • In our exercise, the first test had M = 79 and s = 8. • Suppose we want to change our observed score of 80 to a metric in which the mean is 50 and the standard deviation is 10. • Standardize: (80 – 79) / 8 = 0.125 • Change to target metric: 0.125  10 + 50 = 51.25.

  14. Metric change • The other test had a mean of 64 and standard deviation of 10. • Standardize our score of 68: Z = (68 – 64) / 10 = 0.4. • Change to the new metric: 0.4  10 + 50 = 54. • Again, we can see that the second result is better: 54 > 51.25.

  15. Metric change (cont.) • This sort of change of scale is very common in educational testing. • Most large standardized tests are developed with mean = 0 and standard deviation = 1. • Parents don’t like negative achievement scores.

  16. One more thing about Z scores • As stated before, the Z score doesn’t change anything other than the scale of the variable. • Unfortunately, the word “normalizing” has sometimes been applied as a synonym for “standardizing.”

  17. More about Z scores (cont.) • This has created the misunderstanding that calculating a Z score somehow changes the distribution of the variable into a normal distribution. • That belief is a serious error!

  18. Random variables • Think about students at Merced High School. • We can imagine with a high degree of confidence that all of them are either male or female. • Let’s denote males as “0” and females as “1”. • What proportion of each would we expect to observe if we were to visit the school?

  19. Random variables (cont.)

  20. Random variables (cont.) • Think about what we just did: • Specified some values; • Described the relative frequencies of those values. • That sounds like a distribution. • But we never actually observed anything!

  21. Random variables (cont.) • Recall that a variable, for us, is numbers that convey information about a well defined entity. • A random variable is numbers that could convey information about a well defined entity; but those numbers exist only in our imagination. • As soon as we actually observe a random variable, it is no longer a random variable.

  22. Probability distributions

  23. Probability distributions

  24. Probability distributions

  25. Probability distributions • A probability distribution is the set of values that a random variable could take on, if we were to observe it… • …together with the long-run relative frequencies or probabilities of those values.

  26. What is probability, anyway? • Problems with the book’s approach. • Book: probability of A = (number of outcomes classified as A) / (total number of possible outcomes). • Works OK for analytical approach to things like playing card draws. • Doesn’t work so well for things like a coin toss.

  27. Defining probability • Why doesn’t it work so well for things like a coin toss? • Coins are not necessarily “fair.” I could have a trick coin that comes up heads 70% of the time. • That coin would still have two possible outcomes, of which “heads” is one.

More Related