1 / 33

Overcoming Legislative Gridlock: How Procedural Rules Affect Obstructionism

This study examines the impact of procedural rules on legislative gridlock and obstructionism. It analyzes the role of committee gatekeeping and calendar control in determining the fate of bills in Congress and state legislatures. By studying variations in these rules, the study sheds light on the factors that contribute to legislative inaction.

lvargas
Download Presentation

Overcoming Legislative Gridlock: How Procedural Rules Affect Obstructionism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overcoming Legislative Gridlock:How Procedural Rules Affect Obstructionism Molly C. Jackman Governance Studies Brookings Institution

  2. Obama and gun control • Acceptance speech, 2008: • “Don’t tell me we can’t uphold the 2nd Amendment while keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals.” • January 2011 (after Tuscon shooting): • “That's why our focus right now should be on sound and effective steps that will actually keep those irresponsible, law-breaking few from getting their hands on a gun in the first place.” • July 2012 (after Aurora shooting): • “I…believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals. • January 2013 (after Newton shooting): • “in the coming weeks I’ll use whatever power this office holds” in an effort “aimed at preventing more tragedies like this.” • September 2013 (after Naval Yard shooting): • “No other advanced nation endures this kind of violence — none…And there is nothing inevitable about it. It comes about because of decisions we make or fail to make. And it falls upon us to make it different.”

  3. Public opinion on gun control

  4. Congressional action on gun control • In the 113th Congress, 72 bills have been introduced. • 56 to restrict gun rights. • 16 to expand gun rights. • Zero have become law (so far…).

  5. Most bills do not receive a vote! • In this session, 8/72 bills reported from committee, and one received a floor vote. • 112th Congress: • 28 bills introduced to restrict gun rights. • Four made it out of committee. • Four received a floor vote. • Three passed chamber where introduced (House). • Zero made it out of committee in the Senate. • 26 bills introduced to expand gun rights. • Zero made it out of committee.

  6. Progress of Bills in the House Source: Congressional Bills Project.

  7. What causes legislative inaction? • Bad bills get blocked. • Majority party size. • Reid almost didn’t bring assault weapons ban to a vote, because he knew it would be DOA in the House. • Polarization within and across parties. • 15 red state Democratic Senators voted against ban. • Highest level of party unity in House history. • These factors cannot account for the totality of obstructionism! • Need procedural rules to facilitate bill blocking.

  8. Procedural rules in the U.S. House • Committees can block bills (i.e., decline to hear them or to report them). • Speaker and Rules Committee have lots of discretion to determine the order of bills on the calendar.

  9. Majority party gatekeeping • The majority party has a gatekeeping right if procedures allow it not to act on a proposal, and the result of inaction is that the status quo policy remains in effect. • E.g., majority appointed committees can block bills, majority leader sets floor agenda. • The majority party has gatekeeping power if it has a gatekeeping right and that right produces an outcome that is preferable to the one that would have occurred absent the right. Do majority party gatekeeping rights lead to increased majority party power?

  10. Do majority party gatekeeping rights  power? • Do majority party gatekeeping rights increase majority party power above and beyond the size and heterogeneity of parties? • Ideally, need a baseline model: • What are legislative outcomes absent majority party gatekeeping rights? Impossible in U.S. House. • How does variation in majority party gatekeeping rights explain variation in legislative outcomes? Rules change infrequently and simultaneously. Cannot identify cause and effect.

  11. New strategy • Look at the states! • Tons of variation in legislative outcomes. • In the 2011-2012 legislative session, 1008 bills introduced in the states to amend gun laws. • 284 to strengthen gun rights, 425 to strengthen gun control. • 148 bills passed. • Tons of variation in procedural rules/majority party gatekeeping rights?

  12. Measuring rules in the states • Consider two main junctures in the legislative process for majority party gatekeeping: (1) committee stage and (2) calendar stage. • NCSL survey of committee procedures. • Survey of state legislative clerks and secretaries (with Sarah Anzia): • How bills are placed on the chamber’s floor calendars. • Who appoints committee members and chairs. • Whether the full chamber votes on committee assignments.

  13. Variation in state gatekeeping rights Committee gatekeeping: Can a majority party appointed committee decline to hear bills? Yes in 72 chambers. Can a majority party appointed committee decline to report bills? Yes in 74 chambers. Can a majority party appointed committee either decline to hear or to report bills? Majority party committee gatekeeping exists in 79 chambers.

  14. Variation in state gatekeeping rights (cont.) Calendar gatekeeping: Does a majority leader set the calendar? Yes in 45 chambers. Can majority party appointed committee set the calendar? Yes in 16 chambers. Does a majority party leader or committee set the calendar? Yes in 61 chambers.

  15. Nevada Assembly: committee gatekeeping • The majority party appoints committee members and chairs. • Susan Furlong (clerk): “Committee chairmanship and membership appointments are determined by the Speaker.” • Can committees can decline to hear bills? Yes! (NCSL). • Committees can decline to report bills? Yes! (NCSL). Majority party has committee gatekeeping rights.

  16. Nevada Assembly: calendar gatekeeping • What person, committee or process determines the order in which bills are heard by the floor? • Susan Furlong (clerk): “Once bills are reported out of committee, they are placed on second or third reading, as appropriate, in numerical order in accordance with our house rules and custom and precedence. A member may make a motion to place a bill in a different position on second or third reading or to put a bill on hold by moving it to the desk.” Majority party does not have calendar gatekeeping rights.

  17. Nevada Senate: committee gatekeeping • Who determines the appointment of committee members and chairs? • Sherry Rodriguez (Assistant Secretary): The Chair of each committee is chosen by the majority caucus (majority leader). Standing committees are ALWAYS Chaired by a member of the majority party. The members for each committee are assigned the same way, by the Majority Leader, except the Minority members are chosen and placed on each Standing Committee by the minority caucus (minority leader).” • Note: Committee appointments based on proportional representation (NCSL). • Can committees decline to hear bills? Yes! (NCSL). • Can committees can decline to report bills? Yes! (NCSL). Majority party has committee gatekeeping rights.

  18. Nevada Senate: calendar gatekeeping • What person, committee or process determines the order in which bills are heard by the floor? • Sherry Rodriguez (Assistant Secretary): “After a bill has been passed out of a Standing Committee, the bill comes to the Senate Front Desk with the committee’s recommendation on the bill. The bill is then placed on the Daily Agenda in numerical order placing Senate bills first and the Assembly bills following in their numerical order. A Senator may stand during the floor session and request that any bill on the Daily Agenda be moved to another position if they give the purpose for their request such as possibly waiting for an amendment.” Majority party does not have calendar gatekeeping rights.

  19. Measuring legislative outcomes • If the majority party has gatekeeping rights, no bill should come to a vote that the leadership opposes. • What bills might the majority party oppose? • Majority rolls: passing bills on which a majority of the majority party votes in opposition. • Majority party rolls should be low/zero in chambers where the majority party has gatekeeping rights.

  20. Example: immigration reform • Stuck in committee. • Boehner invoked the Hastert Rule: “I don’t see any way of bringing an immigration reform bill to the floor that doesn’t have the majority support of Republicans.” • In other words, he will not allow a vote on a bill that would result in a roll (i.e., pass against the wishes of a majority of the majority party).

  21. Source: Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  22. NV House Total votes: 138 Majority rolls: 3 Maj. roll rate: 0.023 NV Senate Total votes: 129 Majority rolls: 1 Maj. roll rate: 0.008

  23. Effect of committee gatekeeping rights on majority roll rates Majority roll rates are lower in chambers where the majority party has committee gatekeeping rights.

  24. Effect of calendar gatekeeping rights on majority roll rates Majority roll rates are lower in chambers where the majority party has calendar gatekeeping rights.

  25. Rule configurations and majority rolls Majority roll rates are lower in chambers with majority party gatekeeping rights.

  26. Example: Colorado House

  27. Why should we care? • Procedural rules affect gridlock and policy outcomes. • 5.2 percentage points = ~23 bills. And these are the important bills!

  28. Progression of gun laws in state legislatures

  29. Why should we care? • Procedural rules affect gridlock and policy outcomes. • 5.2 percentage points = ~23 bills. And these are the important bills! 2. Institutional design.

  30. Conclusions • Partisan polarization is preventing important policymaking in the U.S. • The majority party exercises power in legislatures not only by pushing bills forward, but also by holding them back. • In order for this to be the case, it is necessary that the majority party has gatekeeping rights. • The majority party shares a greater policymaking advantage where: • It can block bills in committee. • If can block bills from appearing on the floor calendar.

  31. Extra Slides

More Related