1 / 8

Requirements from public organizations to deal with desertification risk

Requirements from public organizations to deal with desertification risk. Structure of the RIO 92 Environmental Conventions General assembly (GA) National Committees and Focal Points (NAPs) Committee for Science and Technology (CST) Global Mechanism (GM) Secretariat

lucus
Download Presentation

Requirements from public organizations to deal with desertification risk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Requirements from public organizations to deal with desertification risk

  2. Structure of the RIO 92 Environmental Conventions General assembly (GA) National Committees and Focal Points (NAPs) Committee for Science and Technology (CST) Global Mechanism (GM) Secretariat (ad hoc nominated groups)

  3. SOs are multi-dimensional and trade-offs to be made • Among threestrategicobjectives • Global versus local concerns • Track progress • ‘Progress’ indicators • Harmonization versus standardization of indicators SO1: to improve the living conditions of affected populations SO2: to improve the condition of affected ecosystems SO3:to generate global benefits through effective implementation of the Convention UNCCD Strategy strategic objectives (SOs)Implications for indicator approaches

  4. Tracking progress in meeting the SOs requires • an information and knowledge base • through an M&E approach • with interactive modules • Indicators • Global • National/local • Indicator sourcing and management mechanisms at global and national/local levels • Conceptual framework that allows integrating indicators Prerequisite: operational delineation of affected areas Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) approach

  5. Delineation of affected areasStep wise approach Affectedarea = Drylandarea 1st step (mandatory) 0.05>AI>0.65 2nd step (optional) Socioeconomicpressurechange - + 0 Potentiallyaffected At risk of beingaffected Actuallyaffected Affected in thepast - • + • Recov* Degrad + - • Vegetationdensity • change • Soil & watervulnerability • Land use fastchanges Archives Field survey EO & rainfall data

  6. System Dynamics-based Understanding of Desertification Processes: SDUDP - Focus on systems understanding Conceptual integration framework

  7. Reinforce local-global feedback loop • Goal-oriented knowledge brokering system • Capacity building • Update reporting procedures • Establish information & knowledge base using M&E plattform Technical and resource requirements

  8. M&E Interactions – Overview AffectedAreasDelineation NAPs Harmonizing Indicators Syndromes M&E UNCCD Strategy DPSheIR/SDUDP Integration Framework Storylines Adaptive Management Synergies SLM

More Related