180 likes | 409 Views
Criminal Procedure and the Constitution . Chapter 2. Constitutionalism. In a constitutional democracy, constitutionalism is the idea thatconstitutions adopted by the whole peopleare a higher form of law than ordinary lawspassed by legislatures.Constitutions are permanent, general principles.La
E N D
1. Criminal Procedure 7th Edition
Joel Samaha
Thomson-Wadsworth Publishing
2. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution Chapter 2
3. Constitutionalism In a constitutional democracy,
constitutionalism is the idea that
constitutions adopted by the whole people
are a higher form of law than ordinary laws
passed by legislatures.
Constitutions are permanent, general principles.
Laws are detailed, constantly changing rules.
4. Constitutions Constitutions have six characteristics:
They are the highest form of law.
They express the will of the whole people.
They always bind the government.
They cannot be changed by the government.
They can only be changed by direct action by the whole people.
They embody the fundamental values of the people.
5. The Law of Criminal Procedure The U.S. Constitution is the highest
authority in criminal procedure. The law of
criminal procedure is based on the Bill of
Rights. They are rules that the government
must follow to:
Detect and investigate crimes
Apprehend suspects
Prosecute and convict defendants
Punish criminals
6. Criminal Procedure Provisions and the Constitution Most criminal procedure provisions are
found in the following amendments to the
U.S. Constitution:
Fourth
Fifth
Sixth
Eighth
Fourteenth
7. Criminal Procedure Protections in the Bill of Rights
8. The U.S. Constitution and the Courts The supremacy clause and judicial review
together establish that criminal procedure
has to answer to the U.S. Constitution.
All courts can interpret the Constitution, but the U.S. Supreme Court has the final word.
U.S. Supreme Court decisions bind all other courts.
States’ rules cannot violate the U.S. Constitution.
9. State Constitutions and State Courts Every state constitution guarantees its
citizens parallel rights—rights similar to
those in the U.S. Constitution and Bill of
Rights.
States can raise the minimum standards of
rights set by the U.S. Supreme court but
cannot reduce rights below that standard.
10. State Courts as a Source of Criminal Procedure Law State courts are a source of criminal
procedural law in two types of cases:
Those involving the U.S. Constitution that the U.S. Supreme Court hasn’t decided yet.
Those involving their own state constitutions.
11. Due Process of Law According to the 14th Amendment, states
must provide due process and equal
protection of the law.
Procedural due process means “fair process.”
Due process guarantees fair procedures for deciding cases.
12. Hurtado and Charging by Information Hurtado v. California (1884)—the defendant
Joseph Hurtado was indicted in a murder
case without being charged by a grand jury.
Hurtado argued that charging by information was unconstitutional under the 14th and 5th Amendments.
The court rejected his argument (but later adopted the view in the 1960s).
13. The “Scottsboro Boys” and Due Process of Law Powell v. Alabama (1932)—nine black
defendants, “the Scottsboro boys,” were
charged with raping two white girls.
With an alcoholic defense attorney, 8 were tried, convicted, and sentenced to death in a span of four days.
The Alabama Supreme Court upheld the convictions, but the U.S. Supreme Court later overturned them because the boys were denied due process of law.
14. Brown v. Mississippi and Coerced Confessions Brown v. Mississippi (1936)—three black
men were severely and repeatedly beaten
until they confessed to killing a white man.
After a one day trial, all three were convicted and sentenced to death.
The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the convictions.
The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the convictions, ruling that the confessions were anything but voluntary.
15. The Fundamental Fairness Doctrine Powell v. Alabama and Brown v. Mississippi
established the fundamental fairness
doctrine. According to this, states must
provide two basics of a fair trial:
Notice to defendants of the charges against them.
A hearing on the facts before convicting and punishing defendants.
16. The Incorporation Doctrine By the 1960s, the majority of the Court
came to reject the fundamental fairness
doctrine, favoring instead the incorporation
doctrine.
This defined 14th Amendment due process as applying specific provisions of the Bill of Rights to state criminal procedures.
Fundamental fairness doctrine focused on general fairness, while incorporation focused on specific procedures.
17. Bill of Rights Provisions Incorporated (as of 2007)
18. Equal Protection of the Law A constitutional command since 1868, equal
protection protects people from being
investigated, apprehended, convicted, and
punished unreasonably.
19. Violating Equal Protection of the Law To claim a violation of equal protections,
defendants must prove two things:
Discriminatory effect—The official action was based on race or some other group identity.
Discriminatory purpose—The named official in the group intended to discriminate against the named individual because of race or some other group identity.