200 likes | 586 Views
Searches for Evidence. Chapter 6. Searches and Crime Control. Crime control couldn't survive withoutsearches.The Fourth Amendment balances the need for searches against the invasion of individuals' right to privacy.The right against unreasonable searches and seizures is difficult to protect.Sear
E N D
1. Criminal Procedure 7th Edition
Joel Samaha
Thomson-Wadsworth Publishing
2. Searches for Evidence Chapter 6
3. Searches and Crime Control Crime control couldnt survive without
searches.
The Fourth Amendment balances the need for searches against the invasion of individuals right to privacy.
The right against unreasonable searches and seizures is difficult to protect.
Searches for evidence include those done with and without warrants.
4. Analyzing Searches In analyzing government action in searches,
we must ask:
Was the government action a search?
If it was a search, was it reasonable?
If it was unreasonable, then should the evidence be excluded?
5. Searches with Warrants The Fourth Amendment commands officers
to get search warrants.
There are many exceptions to the warrant requirement.
Most searches are done without warrants.
6. Meeting the Warrant Requirement Three elements are required to meet the
Fourth Amendments warrant requirement:
Particularitythe place to be searched and the things to be seized must be particularly described.
The probable cause affidavitshows evidence that the items will be at a particular place.
The knock-and-announce rulerequires officers to knock and announce themselves and wait a reasonable amount of time before breaking and entering.
7. Knock-and-Announce Exceptions Currently, there are three major exceptions
to the knock-and-announce rule:
To prevent violence
To prevent destruction of evidence
To prevent suspects from escaping
8. Searches without Warrants While securing a warrant before searching is
preferable, in practice, most searches are
done without warrants.
Courts have broadly interpreted the exceptions to the warrant requirement.
9. Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement There are five major exceptions to the
warrant requirement:
Searches incident to arrest
Consent searches
Vehicle searches
Container searches
Emergency searches (exigent circumstances searchers)
10. Searches Incident to Arrest Searches incident to arrest are searches
conducted before, during, and after arrest.
They do not require warrants or probable cause.
Officers may only search the area under immediate control of the arrested persons (grabbable area).
It extends to vehicles.
11. Functions of Searches Incident to Arrest Searches incident to arrest serve three
functions:
Protect officers
Prevent escape
Preserve evidence
12. The Robinson Rule Under the Robinson bright-line rule, officers
are always permitted to search anyone they
can take into custody because:
There is possible danger to police taking suspects into custody.
It is impossible for the Court to review every police decision.
Theres no automatic search incident to
citation rule.
13. Consent Searches Consent searches are searches in which
people give officers permission to search
them and/or their personal belongings
without either warrants or probable cause.
Consent must be voluntary.
Consent may be later withdrawn.
14. The Voluntariness Test of Consent Using the totality-of-circumstances, the government must
establish:
Knowledge of constitutional rights in general
Knowledge of the right to refuse consent
Sufficient age and maturity to make an independent decision
Intelligence to understand the significance of consent
Education in or experience with the workings of the criminal justice system
Cooperation with officers
Attitude toward the likelihood that officers will discover contraband
Length of detention and nature of questioning regarding consent
Coercive police behavior surrounding the incident
15. Third Party Consent Theres both a subjective and an objective
rule to decide whether one person can
consent to search for someone else.
Actual authority (objective) third party consent
Apparent authority (subjective) third party consent
The U.S. Supreme Court adopted the
apparent authority test as the minimum
requirement for the Fourth Amendment.
16. Vehicle Searches The vehicle exception to the warrant
requirement allows for warrantless searches
of vehicles if probable cause to believe
contraband or evidence exists.
Theres a reduced expectation of privacy in vehicles.
Vehicles are mobile and can leave area.
Persons and containers within a vehicle may be searched.
17. Emergency (Exigent) Searches Some situations make it impractical (even
dangerous) for officers to get warrants
before searching. The danger might be:
To officers safety (justification for frisks and pat-downs)
That evidence may be destroyed
That fleeing felons might escape
That people in the community are in immediate danger
18. Destruction of Evidence A warrantless search is permitted if police
have probable cause to search, and they
reasonably believe evidence is about to be
destroyed.
19. Hot Pursuit If officers are in hot pursuit of a suspect for
whom they have probable cause to arrest,
they can follow the suspect into a house
without getting a warrant.
20. Danger to the Community A warrantless search is permitted if officers
have probable cause to believe that a
suspect has committed a violent crime or
that they or others in the community are in
immediate danger.