1 / 16

Occurrence and Coverage of Winter Season Fog in the Northern Mid-Atlantic

Occurrence and Coverage of Winter Season Fog in the Northern Mid-Atlantic Paul J. Croft & Aaron N. Burton G & M Department of Geology and Meteorology Kean University Why Fog?? Low C/V directly impacts aviation as well as regular transportation particularly in the winter season

lotus
Download Presentation

Occurrence and Coverage of Winter Season Fog in the Northern Mid-Atlantic

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Occurrence and Coverage of Winter Season Fog in the Northern Mid-Atlantic Paul J. Croft & Aaron N. Burton G&MDepartment of Geology and MeteorologyKean University

  2. Why Fog?? • Low C/V directly impacts aviation as well as regular transportation particularly in the winter season • Improve forecasts of coverage & occurrence • Lack of knowledge • Fog studied widely from a micro-physical & mesoscale standpoint • Synoptic considers type of atmospheres that potentially produce fog • Improving forecasting and dispersal techniques

  3. Methods • Data collection • Fog frequencies obtained from F-6 reports @ http://www.erh.noaa.gov • Study Period: 3 seasons (Dec-Feb) 2003-2004, 2004-2005, & 2005-2006 • Synoptic Classification • Classic approach • Microphysical approach • Physiographic approach • Spatial Distribution & Frequency of fog according to observed Synoptic Type

  4. Spatial Coverage Defined Less than 4 sites report (<29% of sites): Localized 4 -10 sites report (29% to 71% of sites): Scattered More than 10 sites report (>71% of sites): Widespread Fog Criteria Capture as many events as possible for region – liberal/conservative Fog is defined as FG or BR @ 5sm or less Criteria for dense fog is visibility <1/4SM Fog event defined when any one of the 14 stations reported fog on any day Methods (cont.)

  5. Methods (cont.) • Each fog event & non-event classified by synoptic type through inspection of DWM series • Type “A”: High; Type “B”: Low; Type “C”: Frontal • Subtypes determined by location of H/L with regard to the center of the region & FROPA type • Why Synoptic Typing? • To help determine the coverage according to the synoptic regime and local physiographic features • Isolate the primary factors related to fog coverage during those regimes and improve regional forecast

  6. Total Frequency (days) Fog by Location Very Frequent in Winter! MPO Max 79% 215 events out of 271 possible days Only 56 Non-Events

  7. Subtype Frequencies

  8. High Pressure Frequencies NE Urban Minimum Very Sparse

  9. Low Pressure Frequencies Northern Preference

  10. Frontal Frequencies Western Preference/MPO Max Orographic/Marine Influences

  11. Composites Examine synoptic regime Consider zone forecasts

  12. Conclusions/Findings • Prime Locations – MPO, ISP, RDG • Although type “A” (High) was most frequent of all synoptic types, type “B” (Low) & “C” (Front) were more prolific & efficient at generating fog • “B” and “C” also had greater coverage & intensity • Warm Fronts and Low ‘S-SW’ significant • Maximum percentage of dense events occurred with the warm frontal events • Events associated with a Low S-SW were widespread • Forecast & Verification aspects to be considered

  13. References • Baker, R., Cramer, J., and Peters, J., year: Radiation fog: UPS airlines conceptual models and forecast methods. • Bendix, J., 2002: A satellite-based climatology of fog and low-level stratus in Germany and adjacent areas. J. Atmos. Res., 64: 3-18. • Bott, A., and Trautmann, T., 2002: PAFOG: A new efficient forecast model of radiation fog and low-level stratiform clouds. J. Atmos. Res., 64: 191-203. • Croft, P. J., 2002: Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences - Fog, Edited by James R. Holton, John Pyle, and Judith A. Curry December 2002, Elsevier / Academic Press, ISBN: 0-12-227090-8 • Croft, P. J., Pfost, R., Medlin, J., Johnson, A., 1997. Fog forecasting in the southern region: A conceptual model approach. Weather and Forecasting, 12, 545-556. • Chang, Kang-tsung. Introduction to Geographic Systems. New York, New York, 2004. • Fuchs, W., Schickel, K. P., 1995: Aircraft icing in visual meteorological conditions below low stratus clouds. J. Atmos. Res., 36: 339-345. • George, J. J., 1963: Weather forecasting for Aeronautics. Eastern Airlines – Atlanta, Georgia. • Leipper, D. F., 1994: Fog on the U. S. west coast: A review. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 75, 229-240.

  14. Acknowledgements • Department of Geology and Meteorology faculty and staff at Kean University • The Department in access to GIS software and laboratory resources • Dr. John F. Dobosiewicz and Will Heyniger • Philadelphia NWS and the Office of the New Jersey State Climatologist • Thankful for their support and helpful insights during the completion of this project. • The images provided by the NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, Boulder Colorado • http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/based on the NCEP Re-Analysis data. NCEP Reanalysis data provided by the NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, Boulder, Colorado, USA Questions? Thank you!

More Related