1 / 19

Human Systems Integration

Human Systems Integration. 14 May 2007 Mr. Richard M. Etheridge (OPNAV N125). Objective. Provide update on Human Systems Integration Program Baseline What we knew… Strategy What we know… What are we working on… Way Ahead. What we knew Background.

locker
Download Presentation

Human Systems Integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Human Systems Integration 14 May 2007 Mr. Richard M. Etheridge (OPNAV N125)

  2. Objective • Provide update on Human Systems Integration • Program Baseline • What we knew… • Strategy • What we know… • What are we working on… • Way Ahead

  3. What we knewBackground • HSI is a requirement and a commitment: • Public Law 107-314, National Defense Appropriation Act, 03-07 • GAO Report - 03-520 Navy Actions Needed to Optimize Crew Size and Reduce Total Ownership Costs, Jun 03 • Systems Engineering Acquisition & Personnel Integration Report to Congress, Mar 04 • DoD Report to the House Armed Services Committee, Dec 05 • Navy needs to do more to consider HSI issues early in system development cycle for defense acquisition • No centralized office with clear singular authority to manage program • Navy does not optimize trade-offs among the domains or among families of systems when they cross warfare areas • Lack of authority and accountability to optimize human performance capabilities and reduce Navy life cycle costs • National Defense Appropriation Act FY 03-08 • Chief of Naval Operations Guidance, Mar 07

  4. What we knew Background • Definition: An aspect of System Engineering that addresses the risk to humans are required to operate, maintain, and support a system. • An assessment and plan to optimize manpower, improve performance, and minimize risk. • Systems Engineering Personnel Integration versus Navy Acquisition Personnel Integration • Enterprise approach to Human Systems Integration • SECNAV and OPNAV agree that HSI requirements in JCIDS is the focus • “Provides a proactive approach to defining, developing, and managing the future Naval Force Requirements” 1 • “Includes specific Joint Capabilities Integration Development System requirements controls and assessments1

  5. NAVPRINT Program Baseline

  6. NAVPRINT Strategy & Status Phase 2 Human Analysis & Requirements Planning System (HARPS) Congressional Manpower, Personnel, Training Problem in Acquisition 6.2 Applied Research for feasibility and practicability studies 6.3 Advanced Technology Development, assessment of operability and productivity 6.5 RDT&E Management Support for technical integration efforts and technical information and activities HSI Education and Training for the Workforce Fuels, & GCCS-M Case Studies GAO Report on 03-520 Navy Actions Needed to Optimize Crew Size and Reduce Total Ownership Costs, Jun 03 Systems Engineering Acquisition & Personnel Integration Report to Congress, Mar 04 Preliminary Report to the House Armed Services Committee Human Systems Integration Activit in DoD Acquisition Programs, Dec 05 Follow-up on GAO Report 03-520, to USD (P&R), 10 Mar 06 Follow-up GAO Report 03-520, To USD (P&R), Sep 06 Joint HSI Steering Group Stood-up by USD (P&R), Oct 06 Report to House Armed Services Committee Human Systems Integration Activity in Dodd Acquisition Programs, TBD (Jun 07) E2C Case Study IMPRINT-N and Navy Stressors MANPRINT Analysis HSI Measures and metrics Development HSI Department Of Defense Architecture Framework OPNAVINST 5310.23 SECNAVINST 5000.2D 2003 NDAA 2004 NDAA 2005 NDAA 2006 NDAA 2007 NDAA Department of Defense Architecture Phase 1 “What” “What to do Process” Volume 1 “Why” Volume 2 “What” Phase 2 “How to” Integrated Architecture Volume 3 “How to” Phase 1 Human Analysis & Requirements Planning System (HARPS) FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

  7. Joint Capabilities Development Integration System (CJCSI 3170.01D) O P N A V S E C N A V Domain Analysis Policy & Guidance Navy Training System Requirements, Acquisition, and Management (OPNAVINST 1500.76A) Human Performance Systems Model Manual of Navy Total Force Manpower, Policy & Procedures (OPNAVINST 1000.16J Shipboard Habitability Program (OPNAVINST 9640.01A) Safety & Occupational Health (MIL-STD-882D) Human Systems Integration (OPNAVINST 5310.23) Link Link Operation of the Defense Acquisition System (DoDI 5000.2) Implementation & Operation of the Defense Acquisition System & The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System SECNAVINST 5000.2C) VIRTUAL SYSCOM HSI Guide Volume 2 Implementing The HSI Process Into Acquisition Programs Volume 3 How to Process Volume 1 Human Systems Integration Overview SYSCOM Policy NAVSEA (NAVSEAINST 3900.8X) NAVAIR (NAVAIRINST XXX) SPAWAR (SPAWARINST XXX) What we are working on OPNAV and SECNAV HSI Implementation • OPNAV Policy provides a link between requirements, funding, and SECNAV acquisition execution.

  8. NAVPRINT Implementation Programmatic Policy VCNO HSI GOVERNANCE BOARD N12 Chair NAVSEA 05H SPAWAR 4G NAVAIR 4.6 NAVSUP 04 OPNAV 093 OPNAV 09F ONR CNA NETC NPDC HPC NAVMAC NWC NPGS PERS 4 BUMED Barrier Removal JCIDS CNP Resource Requirements Review Board Executive Secretary N125 • HSI Governance: • Optimize manpower • Improve Performance • Mitigate risk Policy, Requirements, Resource Integration OPNAV N1, N8, N4, N6, OPTEVFOR, NAVMAC, HPC Technical Authority & Execution ASN RD&A, DASNs, PEOs, SYSCOM,s, PMs Environment, Safety, Occupational Health Personnel Habitability Training Survivability Manpower Requirements (Warfare Enterprises) Aviation, Expeditionary, Submarine, Surface, Networks Common Policy, Processes, Procedures

  9. What we are we doingOPNAV scorecard

  10. What we are doingProgram Scorecard

  11. What we are doingHSI Scorecard Applicable Statute: OPNAVINST 1500.76A When Required: Initial: MS A, Draft: MS B/C, Update: MS C 14 working days prior to release date

  12. Way Ahead • OPNAVINST 5310.23 implementation • HARPS Functional Requirements Document • Implement OPNAVINST 5310.23 and HARPS I/II • Implement FY07-08 Funding Plan • Update JCIDS 3170.01 Instruction and Manual • Revise SECNAVINST 5000.2D • ASN Role/Resp (M&RA, I&E, RD&A, etc.) • OPNAV Role/Resp (N1, N4, N6, N8, etc.) • Systems Engineering Plan and Technical Authority Guidance • Department of the Navy Acquisition Guidebook Guidance • Submit Congressional Report by Jun 07

  13. BACK-UP

  14. NAVAIR 4.6 High HSI impact - Cost avoidance - Survivability, Safety, Health Hazard Risk avoidance - Performance enhancement - Cross domain use of task and role analysis Mockup used for assessing software in development, as well as anthropometrics, hardware interfaces, lighting evaluation, maintainability, and general operator usability What we are working onHSI Success: E-2D Hawkeye Before After

  15. NAVSEA 03/05H High HSI impact Cost avoidance Survivability, Safety, Health Hazard avoidance Performance enhancement Cross domain use of task and role analysis Fleet brought in early to identify design hazards, proposing modifications to optimize design for human performance Leveraged human performance modeling very early in system design to explore impact of manning concepts, automation technologies, and other system design concepts on crew ability perform the mission What we are working onHSI Success: DDG-1000

  16. SPAWAR 04G Significant HSI Pay-off Performance enhancement Cost avoidance Cross domain use of task and role analysis Applied HSI to each domain to improve human performance and systems performance Analyzed existing task and function information, yielding task and redesign Program Management Office and fleet customer response extremely positive What we are working onHSI Success: GCCS-M

  17. What we are working onHuman Performance Success: The Seal Story SEAL Promotion Goal: Develop a promotion model that better reflects SEAL values than current FMS (Final Multiple Score). Recommendation: Implement a SEAL promotional algorithm based upon critical factors. Status: • Conducted a ‘mock’ board using algorithm with high success. (AUG 06) • Replicate ‘mock’ board using new SEAL rating exam. (JUN 07) SEAL Selection Goal: Reduce attrition in BUDS by identifying more, better qualified candidates. Recommendation: Develop psychological battery to better select SEAL candidates. Status: • Deployed battery to incoming SEAL class. (FEB 07) • Compare candidate retention data from ‘Hell Week” against selection battery results. (MAR 07-in Great Lakes)

  18. HARPS Phase I • Scope (Complete) • Functional Req (Complete) • Software Spec (Complete) • SOA Tech Stack (Complete) • Software Build 1 (July 07) • Software Build 2 (Aug 07) • Software Test/Pilot (Sept 07) • Rpt of Lessons Learned (Sept 07) • Phase I Implem Strategy (Sept 07) Phase I Implementation • HARPS Phase II • Phase I Operational (Implementation) • Project Scope • Functional Requirements • Software Specifications • Software Build 1 • Software Build 2 • Software Test/Pilot • Training Development & Delivery • DADMS Registration Phase II Implementation What we are working on HARPS Timeline 6.5 RDT&E Management Support for technical integration efforts and technical information and activities • HARPS Phase I: • Job Task Analysis • NTSP Data • Manpower Estimate Report Data • Executable HSI IA • HARPS Phase II: • NTSP Data Capture • Web Service Integration with Manpower, Learning Modeling & Simulation • Executive Dashboard & Decision Support FY06 FY07 FY08

  19. What we are working on IMPRINT-N Timeline 6.5 RDT&E Management Support for technical integration efforts and technical information and activities • “IMPRINT-N” FY ‘06 • Research whole body vibration literature (Complete) • Review results of new sea trials (Delayed) • Preliminary algorithm development (Ongoing) • Implement stressor benchmarks in IMPRINT Pro (Complete) • Draft paper on WPA and potential future IMPRINT Pro impacts (Complete) • “IMPRINT-N” FY ‘06: • Sea state stressor task effects • Stressor benchmarks • Whole Person Assessment • “IMPRINT-N” FY ‘07 • Research other sea state impacts (Motion sickness over time) and Motion Induced Interruptions) • Collect Navy personnel designators (ratings) and associated attributes • Define functional requirements for DADMS and NMCI • Design preliminary plug-in for IMPRINT Pro sea state impacts • Establish a validation plan for plug-in use • DADMS Registration and NMCI certification • “IMPRINT-N” FY ‘07: • Advanced sea state stressor architecture • Add Navy personnel designators • Add Navy personnel projection capability • DADMS and NMCI FY06 FY07 FY08

More Related