1 / 16

Generative Architectures

Generative Architectures. Ole Hanseth Department of Informatics University of Oslo, Norway. Generative Technology. ” .. A technology ’ s overall capacity to produce unprompted change driven by large, varied, and uncoordinated audiences. ” Capacity for leverage Adaptability Ease of mastery

lmccoy
Download Presentation

Generative Architectures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Generative Architectures Ole Hanseth Department of Informatics University of Oslo, Norway

  2. Generative Technology • ”.. A technology’s overall capacity to produce unprompted change driven by large, varied, and uncoordinated audiences.” • Capacity for leverage • Adaptability • Ease of mastery • Accessibility • Computers • PC & Internet • Opposite: Appliances • Telecom: intelligent network + appliances Department of Informatics

  3. Some research results • Morris and Ferguson: ”Architectures win technology wars!” • Architectural control points • Platform centric ecologies • Mirroring • Product – producer • Product – users • Innovation and generativity

  4. Generative networks/communities • Exaptive bootstrapping • Generative relationships • aligned directedness • heterogeneity • mutual directedness. • permissions structures • action opportunities • Design & user communities • Generative fit

  5. The beginning • 1987: Fürst’s lab report transfer solution • 1988: Telenor (Telemedicine in Northern Norway) • Lab report transfer solutions • Standardizing • Statskonsult’s Infrastructure programme: EDI • Physicians’ invoices • CEN TC/251, KITH • Consensus: EDI

  6. The continuation • 90-ies: • Lab reports & orders, prescriptions, physicians and out-patient clinics’ invoices, admission and discharge letters, .. 00-ies: • Lab reports & orders, prescriptions, physicians and out-patient clinics’ invoices, admission and discharge letters, .. • ELIN projects • The message effort (meldingsløftet) • ePrescription • Status: Modest successes, coordination problems, always someone not doing as promised

  7. The EDI Paradigm Information flow ICT architecture Project organization Hospital systems VendorsofGPs’ EPR systems Vendors of hospital syst. GP offices Hospitals GPs’ EPR systems NAV systems NAV’s dev. org. Vendor of the Pharmacies’ system NAV Lab systems Vendors of Lab systems Pharmacies Labs Pharmacy systems

  8. ePrescription

  9. Drifting Architecture • Delays • => Generic module for Profdoc users • => Pharmacies • => DIPS users • Disagreements!

  10. A few other projects • Fürst • Lab report transfer solution, 1987, 3 man weeks + 1 evening • Lab ordering solution • Edimed, Northern Norwegian Health Network • Well/Dips Interactor • Interactive admission letters • BlueFox, Prescription register • MyJournal

  11. An alternative architecture GP GP office GP computer GP’s computer Client module GP’s EPR system Project org. Communication system/network Lab/hospital ICT architecture Project organization Server module Lab/hospital Lab system

  12. Two architectures Non-communicating applications INA Architecture SPA Architecture

  13. Two architectures • Application Centric/Institutional Interface Architecture (AC/INA) • Communication System Centric/Service Provider Architecture (CSC/SPA)

  14. The CSCAParadigm Hospital systems GPs’ EPR systems GP offices Hospitals Welfare Agency Systems National Welfare Agency Lab systems Pharmacy systems Pharma- cies Labs Project organization Information flow ICT architecture Vendors of hospital systems Vendorsof GPs’ EPR systems Project ASP Services ASP Welfare Agencydevel. org. Vendors Phar- macy system Vendors of Lab systems

  15. Generative architecture Scaling, Adoption, Innovation “on” Bootstrapping, Restructuring, Innovation “in” & “of”

  16. Summary Care Record Systems • Scotland: • 3 MGBP (4M Euros, 4 M USD) • Denmark: • Official, top-down • 10 M Euros, • Faded out after about 4 years, officially cancelled after 8 • Unofficial, bottom-up • Great success • Norway (ePrescription) • 500 MNOK, currently piloted in one GP office • UK • Started 2004, early adoption 2007, further deployment is frozen • Spent 240 MGBP

More Related