1 / 20

RESEARCH INSIDE WORK ORGANIZATIONS: focus groups + expert interviews

INFO 272. Qualitative Research Methods 17 March 2009. RESEARCH INSIDE WORK ORGANIZATIONS: focus groups + expert interviews. Schedule. Thursday 3.19.09 guest speaker Elisa Oreglia (+ I will return assignment 1) Spring Break Tue 3.24.09 and Thu 3.26.09 Tuesday after spring break

liza
Download Presentation

RESEARCH INSIDE WORK ORGANIZATIONS: focus groups + expert interviews

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INFO 272. Qualitative Research Methods 17 March 2009 RESEARCH INSIDE WORK ORGANIZATIONS: focus groups +expert interviews

  2. Schedule Thursday 3.19.09 guest speaker Elisa Oreglia (+ I will return assignment 1) Spring Break Tue 3.24.09 and Thu 3.26.09 Tuesday after spring break come prepared to discuss your interviews [have at least one completed] One week later, Tuesday (4.7.09) Assignment 2 is due

  3. Overview One-on-one interviews Projective interviews (introducing artifacts – i.e. photos – or tasks to generate rich data) TODAY: Group interviews and focus groups Expert interviews as a subcategory of interviewing

  4. Focus groups • Very popular in marketing research • 8-10 people – typically strangers • A trained facilitator • Opinions about a new (or existing) product or service • Two-way mirror so ‘management ‘can observe

  5. Focus groups • “an especially nice situation for revealing variations in perspectives and attitude and a ready means, through subtle pitting of one against the other, for distinguishing between shared and variable perspectives.” [schatzman and strauss 1973]

  6. Focus groups • Can be ego-centric (would I buy this?) • Can be object-oriented (how are factory processes organized and carried out?) • Can be collaborative, consensus-driven(what health care services are most needed within this community?)

  7. The standard criticism • Tendency to conform around particular views • Often one member is domineering • Professional respondents Artificiality – voicing views and experiences among strangers in a conference room

  8. Solomon Asch on conformity (1952)

  9. Addressing conformity problems • Some Techniques • Nominal Group Technique – write down ideas about a topic and then read and discuss • Delphi Method – write down response, collected by the facilitator, posted for public reading, then discussed.

  10. Addressing conformity problems • Who not to put in a group • Boss and subordinate • Who else?? • On sensitive topics • Create more homogenous groups (all HIV+ people, all men, etc.) • Combine focus groups with individual interviews

  11. Addressing artificiality problems • Using existing groups (rather than strangers) • Families • Social organizations • [videos – observe social dynamics]

  12. …Next Topic…

  13. Different forms of Interviewing The object of interest may be: • An event (use narrative interviews) • An individual (use in-depth individual interviews) • An issue and the range of views about it (individual or group interviews) • A complex process or system (use expert interviews)

  14. What is an ‘Expert’? • Person who is responsible for the development, implementation or control of solutions/strategies/policies • Person who has privileged access to information about groups or decision processes [Meuser & Nagel]

  15. Expert interviews: advantages • Tend to not worry as much about swaying their responses – can challenge them • Can be highly motivated and interested in your understanding the process/problem + often like to talk • May be well networked – help you find other contacts

  16. Expert interviews: disadvantages • Embedded in power relations. Those in powerful positions who take up the role of ‘expert’ may have a vested interest in preserving the status quo. May conceal or fail to disclose certain relevant, important matters. • Short on time, hard to schedule meetings with.

  17. Expert interviews: Interviewers role • Dress professionally • Come prepared (prior reading on technical subjects, basic terminology, specific questions on things you don’t quite understand)

  18. Expert interviews: Interviewers role Types of Interaction, interviewer as: • Co-expert • Expert outside the field • Lay person ** • Authority • Confederate • Possible critic [Bogner and Menz]

  19. In Summary • Social dynamics in group interviews – potentially a strength but also can be a liability • Ways of managing conformity problems • Ways of managing artificiality of the focus group situation • Expert interviews – more preparation required, interactional dynamics may vary substantially from other forms of interviewing

More Related