370 likes | 500 Views
This article explores advanced portfolio optimization techniques using mean-variance analysis to enhance profit while maintaining defined risk boundaries. We discuss the concept of 'unit risk' coordinates and investigate the impact of transaction costs, including commissions, fees, taxes, and slippage on portfolio performance. An emphasis is placed on the optimal portfolio selection process and the implications of proportional costs on trading strategies. Finally, we analyze the effect of 'no-trade regions' on optimal portfolio construction, offering insights into the intricate balance between risk and profitability.
E N D
Portfolios and Optimization Andrew Mullhaupt
Maximize profit with risk bound: In ‘unit risk’ coordinates: Mean-variance portfolio Portfolio Selection THE END
Transaction Costs Commissions and Fees Taxes Slippage -
Induced Costs Expected Costs Proportional Costs Trade size
Total Loss Risk relative to optimal mean-variance portfolio Cost relative to Initial Portfolio Loss Mean-variance portfolio Initial Portfolio Portfolio Optimal Portfolio
Loss Portfolio
Mean-variance Portfolio OriginalPortfolio
Trading cannot reduce the loss Mean-variance Portfolio Original Portfolio
No Trade Region = Optimality for Proportional Costs Optimality for Superproportional Costs Contains The No Trade Region
Who Says Say’s Law? • Say’s Law: Supply Creates Demand • In the large? (Supply Side Economics). • In the small? Look for sublinear transaction costs (‘volume attracts volume’). • Not frequent enough to explain the expectation but it could be a variance component.
Modified Steepest Descent Alternate between: Move as far as feasible 1) toward the vertex 2) Toward the minimum along the gradient direction
Time Comparison – 5 instances3000x150 The unstructured method is too slow to compare for enough instances
Question Time Yes, you have questions.