Proposition and Necessity

1 / 21

# Proposition and Necessity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Proposition and Necessity. R. E. Jennings [email protected] Y. Chen [email protected] Laboratory for Logic and Experimental Philosophy Simon Fraser University. What is a proposition? The set of necessities at a point ⧠ (x ). Primordial necessity.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Proposition and Necessity' - liora

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Propositionand Necessity

R. E. Jennings

[email protected]

Y. Chen

[email protected]

Laboratory for Logic and Experimental Philosophy

Simon Fraser University

What is a proposition?

The set of necessities at a point ⧠(x).

Primordial necessity

Every point x in U is assigned a primordial necessity R(x) = { y | Rxy } .

The set of necessities at a point ⧠(x)in a model of a binary relational frame F = is a filter.

The `leibnizian’ account

R is universal;

The primordial necessity for every point is identical, which is U.

Only the universally true is necessary (and what is necessary is universally true, and in fact, universally necessary).

CPN frame
• A common primordial necessity
• (x)(y)(z)(Rxz→Ryz) (CPN)
• [K], [RM], [RN], [5], ⧠(⧠p→p), ⧠(p→ ⧠ ◊p).
• R is serial and symmetric.
• R satisfies CPN.
• R is universal.
Necessities in CPN frame

M =

M ⊨ ⧠A iff ℙ ⊆ ∥A∥M

The set of necessities in a model, ⧠(M) is a filter on P (U), i.e. a hypergraph on U.

Entering hypergraph

A hypergraph H is a pair H = (X, E) where X is a set of elements, called vertices, and E is a non-empty set of subsets of X called (hyper)edges. Therefore, E ⊆ P (X).

H is a simple hypergraphiff∀E, E’∈ H, E⊄E’.

Locale frame
• Weakening neighbourhood truth condition
• F =
• N(x) is a set of propositions.
• ∀ A∈Φ, F ⊨ ⧠A iff∃a∈ N(x): a⊆ ∥A∥F
• L = if N’ (x) is a simple hypergraph.
• PL closed under [RM].
• N’ (x)≠∅ [RN]
• N’ (x) is a singleton [K]
Hypergraph semantics
• We use hypergraphs instead of sets to represent wffs.
• Classically, inference relations are represented by subset relations between sets.
• α entails βiff the α-hypergraph, Hα is in the relation R to the β-hypergraph, Hβ .
• HαRHβ . : ∀ E ∈ Hβ , ∃ E’∈ Hα : E’ ⊆ E.
⧠(F)
• F =
• N(x) is a simple hypergraph.
• ∀ A∈Φ, F ⊨ ⧠A iffN(x)R HA
• [K], [RN], [RM(⊦)]
• →?
Necessarily (A is true)

A is necessarily true;

(Necessarily A) is true. ⊨⧠A

HA→B is interpreted as H¬A˅B.

Articular Models (a-models)

Each atom is assigned a hypergraph on the power set of the universe .

FDE
• First degree fragment of E
• A ∧ B ├ A
• A ├ A V B
• A ┤├~~A
• ~(A ∧ B) ┤├ ~A V ~B
• ~(A V B) ┤├ ~A ∧ ~B
• A V (B ∧ C)├ (A V C) ∧ (B V C)
• A ∧(B V C)├ (A ∧ C) V(B ∧ C).
FDE with necessity

Necessarily (A is true) iff∀ E ∈ HA, ∃ v∈ E such that ∃ v’∈ E: v’ = U – v. (N)

(N) is closed under ⊦ and ˄.

A⊦B / necessarily A→B is true.

Problem of entailment

Anderson & Belnap

• D1 D2 … Dn
• C1 C2 … Cm
• ∀1≤ i ≤ n, ∀1≤ j ≤ m, di∩ cj≠ Ø
A & B Con’d

C1 C2 … Cn

C1 C2 … Cm

∀1≤ i ≤ n, ∃1≤ j ≤ m, cj⊆ di

∀1≤ i ≤ n, ∃1≤ j ≤ m, cj⊢ di

Higher degree entailment

((A → A) → B)├B

(A → B)├((B → C) →(A → C))

(A → (A → B))├ (A → B)

(A → B) ∧ (A → C) ├ (A → B ∧ C)

(A → C) ∧ (B → C) ├ (A V B → C)

(A → ~ A)├ ~ A

(A → B)├(~ B → ~ A)

Higher degree E
• ((A → A) → B) → B
• (A → B) →((B → C) →(A → C))
• (A →(A → B)) → (A → B)
• (A → B) ∧ (A → C) → (A → B ∧ C)
• (A → C) ∧ (B → C) → (A V B → C)
• (A → ~ A) → ~ A
• (A → B) → (~ B → ~ A)
Problem of degree

Mixed degree

Uniform substitution