50 likes | 151 Views
This course focuses on developing critical thinking skills in analyzing communication networks and services, with a practical approach to group work, presentations, and examinations.
E N D
S-38.3215 Special Course on Networking TechnologyFall2005 Kalevi Kilkki Principal Scientist, Nokia Docent, TKK
Critical thinking To develop systematic skills in critical thinking about communication networks and services
Course content • Lessons 2 * 3 hours 9.11. Intro, some tools 16.11.Selection of topics for group work 30.11. * “The elements of modelling communication systems” some preliminary thoughts * Group works – state reports 7.12. Presentations & conclusion 14.12. Examination or “controlled exercise”
Other issues • Assistant • Timo Smura timo.smura@tkk.fi • ECTSs and grade depend on • Group work and presentation (~60%) • Final examination (~40%) • critical evaluation of 2 out of 3 (short) papers • Course activity • Any other issue?
Check list for assessing papers about communication networks and services • What is the motivation of the authors? • Do the authors distort the results or exaggerate the importance of the proposal due to their motivation? • What important aspects are avoided or only superficially considered? • What does the style of the paper reveal? • Do the authors really understand what they are proposing? • Do the authors just repeat conventional opinions? • Is the reasoning illogical or shaky? • Is the proposal beneficial for service providers and network operators? • What are the business effects of the proposal, if any? • What are the main cost factors for service providers and operators? • Is the proposal beneficial for end users? • How often it will be used? • What is the additional value per usage? • What are the effects for other users (not directly gaining from the proposal)? • Does the use of the proposal require special skills or training? • What is realistic evolution? • Is there a realistic path toward a wide-scale adoption of the proposal? • Is the proposal acceptable for every key player in each step? • Does the proposal require extensive contracts between stakeholders? • Does the final outcome serve common good?