1 / 13

Canonical LR Parsing Tables

Canonical LR Parsing Tables. Construction of the sets of LR (1) items. Input: An augmented grammar G’. Output: The sets of LR (1) items that are the set of items valid for one or more viable prefixes of G’. Method: Three functions are defined closure(), goto(), items().

linh
Download Presentation

Canonical LR Parsing Tables

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Canonical LR Parsing Tables

  2. Construction of the sets of LR (1) items • Input: An augmented grammar G’. • Output: The sets of LR (1) items that are the set of items valid for one or more viable prefixes of G’. • Method:Three functions are defined closure(), goto(), items()

  3. Function closure (I) Begin Repeat For each item [A α. Bβ, a] in I, each production Bγ in G', and each terminal b in FIRST (βa) such that [B. γ, b] is not in I do add [B. γ, b] to I until no more sets of items can be added to I return I end;

  4. functiongoto (I, X) begin let J be the set of items [AX. β, a] such that [AX β, a] is in I return closure (J) end;

  5. procedure items (G') begin C := {closure ({S'.S, $})}; repeat for each set of itemsI in C and each grammar symbol X such that goto (I,X) is not empty and not in C do add goto (IX) to C until no more sets of items can be added to C end;

  6. EXAMPLE Consider the following augmented grammar:- S’  S S  CC C  Cc | d

  7. The initial set of items is:- I0 : S’  .S, $ S  .CC, $ C  .Cc, c | d C  .d, c | d

  8. We have next set of items as:- I1 : S’  S., $ I2 : S  .Cc, $ C  .Cc, $ C  .d, $ I3 : C  c.C, $ C  .c C, c | d C  .d, $

  9. I4 : C  d. , c | d I5 : S  CC. , $ I6 : C  c.C, $ C  .c C, $ C  .d, $ I7 : C  d. , $ I8 : C  c C. , c | d I9 : C  c C. , $

  10. Construction of the canonical LR parsing table • Input: An augmented grammar G’. • Output: The canonical LR parsing table functions action and goto for G’ • Method:

  11. 1. Construct C= {I0, I1…... In}, the collection of sets of LR (1) items for G’. 2. State I of the parser is constructed from Ii. The parsing actions for state I are determined as follows : a) If [A  α. a β, b] is in Ii, and goto (Ii, a) = Ij, then set action [i, a] to “shift j.” Here, a is required to be a terminal. b) If [A  α., a] is in Ii, A ≠ S’, then set action [i, a] to “reduce A  α.” c) If [S’S., $] is in Ii, then set action [i, $] to “accept.”

  12. If a conflict results from above rules, the grammar is said not to be LR (1), and the algorithm is said to be fail. 3. The goto transition for state i are determined as follows: If goto(Ii , A)= Ij ,then goto[i,A]=j. 4. All entries not defined by rules(2) and (3) are made “error.” 5. The initial state of the parser is the one constructed from the set containing item [S’.S, $].

  13. Submitted by: Tarun Chauhan 04CS1023

More Related