1 / 20

Bloomsbury LMS: Project success factors

Bloomsbury LMS: Project success factors. Sharon Penfold, BLMS Project Manager Andrew Preater, Associate Director, Senate House Libraries. Starting point. Vision 21 st Century Library Management System Flagship shared service model Goals Interoperability Shared user access to resources

ling
Download Presentation

Bloomsbury LMS: Project success factors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bloomsbury LMS:Project success factors Sharon Penfold, BLMS Project Manager Andrew Preater, Associate Director, Senate House Libraries

  2. Starting point • Vision • 21st Century Library Management System • Flagship shared service model • Goals • Interoperability • Shared user access to resources • Open source theme

  3. Open source theme • Over to Andrew

  4. Decision making process

  5. Reference point 1Measures of achievement • Vision • 21st Century Library Management System • Flagship shared service model • Goals • Interoperability • Shared user access to resources • Open source theme

  6. Reference point 2Existing systems x 6 Sentry access control Wireless authentication Online card catalogue Encore catalogue Millennium Agresso 3M self service Badgemaker card printing Pcounter printing/ copying Adlib archives Sharon Penfold, v2, 29/06/12

  7. Reference point 3Landscape

  8. PROCESS Reference point 4Risk appetite Re-engineering SH BB2 RVC2 SOAS2 BB1 SOAS1 IoE Safety 4 RVC1 2 Innovation LSHTM 3 1 SOLUTIONS Migration

  9. Reference point 5 Consortium spectrum SIMPLE COMPLEX Demand aggregation Shared services In house collaboration Converged processes Purchasing power Common platform IoE BB SH LSHTM RVC SOAS

  10. Reference point 6Specification The benefits: • Ownership of the process and output by each consortium partner • Cultural change through engagement of library staff as subject experts • Change agents (aka Systems Librarians) • Shared process understanding • Single view of the truth of the BLMS • Testing strategy and sign-off mechanism

  11. Reference point 7The enterprise context

  12. Options analysis – basic choices 1. Consortium • Kuali, Chicago & commercial partners • Ex Libris cloud 2. Go it alone • Open source viable? • Commercial low end – or high end with even stronger negotiation!

  13. Why Kuali OLE? • Over to Andrew

  14. Implementationapproach • Dependencies • Success-based planning • Work Packages • BAU focus • Collaboration

  15. The grunt work • Over to Andrew

  16. Project challenges • Politics • Governance • Money • LMS appreciation

  17. BLMS success to date • Consortium strength • Project Executive Group leadership • Systems Librarians collaboration & ability • Agile project management & governance • Change management & communications • Enterprise systems context • Experienced IT project manager

  18. Critical success factors in a box:- for the project • Vision • Commitment • Energy • Agility • The right people • Technology to fit the purpose

  19. Critical success factors:- for the technology& more • Over to Andrew

More Related