1 / 1

Arkes et al. (1981) Doctors given a case history to read Is it disease A or disease B?

Arkes et al. (1981) Doctors given a case history to read Is it disease A or disease B? Group 1 - told nothing about real diagnosis Group 2 - told “correct” diagnosis was disease A Group 3 - told “correct” diagnosis was disease B Result: probability estimates were higher for

liluye
Download Presentation

Arkes et al. (1981) Doctors given a case history to read Is it disease A or disease B?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Arkes et al. (1981) • Doctors given a case history to read • Is it disease A or disease B? • Group 1 - told nothing about real diagnosis • Group 2 - told “correct” diagnosis was disease A • Group 3 - told “correct” diagnosis was disease B • Result: probability estimates were higher for • “correct” diagnosis • So: Hindsight Bias • Hindsight bias happens when you warn people • to avoid it • It does not happen when subjects don’t believe • the outcome information

More Related