1 / 9

Conceptualizing the Problem

SESSION C: Lessons from coping with current climate for future adaptation: How useful is it to rely on adaptation to current climate as a means for assessing capacity to adapt to future climate change?. Conceptualizing the Problem. 30. climate change. 25. Capacity. 20. 15. 10. 5. 0.

lillibridge
Download Presentation

Conceptualizing the Problem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SESSION C:Lessons from coping with current climate for future adaptation:How useful is it to rely on adaptation to current climate as a means for assessing capacity to adapt to future climate change?

  2. Conceptualizing the Problem 30 climate change 25 Capacity 20 15 10 5 0 2004 2014 2024 2034 2044 2054 2064 Time, years

  3. ‘The Devil’s Advocate’ (Bill) • Why should we consider that the lessons learned from historical/current adaptation measures is a good indicator for adaptation to future changes? • Why should we believe that incremental changes in capacity (I.e. human, physical) will help us to prepare for long term climate change?

  4. Initial Issues • Where we currently are in terms of being adapted is important! • We can’t incrementally adapt if we are not already adapted • Climate change is not going to be a static, linear future process • Incremental changes may not work • Depends from sector to sector: incremental change may not be as valid for sea level rise concerns as agricultural sector concerns (precautionary principal may apply) • Temporal dynamic: incremental change— • Band-Aids no longer work on a wounded elbow if the arm suddenly falls off

  5. That said… • Historical adaptation has not always been incremental • I.e. migration from drought • Policy change in California agriculture • In some cases incremental adaptation has successfully occurred • Egyptian agricultural practices (change in crops, technologies, etc)

  6. Fundamental Issue: Sustainability • Sustainability of past adaptation measures– how robust are they to current climate? • Can they withstand future climate change? • (In many cases a policy change can occur if current practice is not adequate/sustainable) • Adaptation means policy, too • Perverse incentives can effect adaptation

  7. So what can we learn? • Key: Looking at past adaptation measures forces you to consider human, social, and cultural aspects of adaptation • What are your REAL obstacles??? • A possible shortcoming of much of the current adaptation work is it is often approached from purely technical point of view • Brings to mind development paradigms of the ’50s • Lessons can be learned from both failures and successes

  8. How do we know if adaptation measures are successful? • How to define the adaptation baseline? • The case of climate variability/extreme events, consider ‘damages’ • Health, mortality • Economic • Reduction in mortality • Increases in economic losses

  9. That’s It

More Related