slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Lecture 2 – Superfluid 3 He: Basic Description Ref: AJL, Quantum Liquids, 6.1-2 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Lecture 2 – Superfluid 3 He: Basic Description Ref: AJL, Quantum Liquids, 6.1-2

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 10

Lecture 2 – Superfluid 3 He: Basic Description Ref: AJL, Quantum Liquids, 6.1-2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 76 Views
  • Uploaded on

Lecture 2 – Superfluid 3 He: Basic Description Ref: AJL, Quantum Liquids, 6.1-2 3 He: electronic state (1s) 2 1 S o , is very inert. Nuclear spin ½  system of spin- fermions (like electrons in metals). Atom-atom Interaction :. “hard-core” repulsion. V(r) . r . vdW attraction.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Lecture 2 – Superfluid 3 He: Basic Description Ref: AJL, Quantum Liquids, 6.1-2' - lilith


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Lecture 2 – Superfluid 3He: Basic Description

Ref: AJL, Quantum Liquids, 6.1-2

3He: electronic state (1s)21So, is very inert. Nuclear spin ½  system of spin- fermions (like electrons in metals)

Atom-atom

Interaction:

“hard-core” repulsion

V(r) 

r 

vdW attraction

ro

(~3Å)

Liquid 3He: since 1950 (3H →3He + e + in reactors, weapons)

Below ~ 100 mK, behaves much like (very pure) textbook normal metal (Fermi gas)

viscosity

spin diffusion thermal cond.

but interaction effects v. strong (e.g.~ 20 times value for F.gas)Why?

slide2

Landau Fermi liquid theory:

start from free Fermi gas, turn on interactions adiabaticallyAssume GS evolves adiabatically (excludes superconductivity,

ferromagnetism, crystallization…)

Then GS and low excited states labeled by quantities

= 0 or 1,

= 0 or -1,

}

Expand E of low-lying excited states in :

GSE

Symmetry 

volume

Informal summary of Landau FL theory:

particles → “quasiparticles”, fermions with effective mass m*

subject to molecular fields, with coeffs. prop. to

generated by polarizations of the system (example follows)

For real liquid 3He.

slide3

Molecular fields: example*

(recap):

Select term corr.

But:

Equivalent to molecular field

Application: response to external field (k;)

Spin response of noninteracting F. gas with mass m*

e.g. since static

*note spin, field in arbitrary units.

slide4

Some effects of (spin) molecular field in 3He:

A. Enhanced low-energy spin fluctuations:

B. Coupling of atomic spins by exchange of virtual paramagnons

exchange of V.P’s induces extra effective spin-spin interaction

In limit must bc + ve (stability!), hence in this limit

VP-induced interaction always attractive in spin triplet state, repulsive in singlet.

F. liquid F. gas

↓

Im

w/q

“paramagnon”

(V.P’s)

3He:

slide5

Pairing interaction in liquid 3He:

(a)

Hard core much stronger than for electrons in metals l = 0 disfavored

V(r) 

r

“bare” atom-atom potential

ro(~3Å)

Would like to have first max in radial prob. distrn. at r ~ ro.But C. pairs formed from states near F. surface  k ~ kF., hence first max. at r ~ l/kF.

 l ~ kFro i.e. l = 1,2, or 3.

orig. favored by theory

(b) Spin-fluctuation exchange  extra term, attractive (repulsive)

for S = 1 (S = 0)

(a) + (b) + Pauli principle  l = 1 may be favored.

Need to generalize BCS theory to l  0 pairing.

1. (for orientation only): anisotropic singlet pairing(e.g. l = 2)

BCS ansatz: N = (ck)N/2 |vac>, but now

Ck can depend on direction of k on FS.

otherwise, all the BCS-based maneuvers go through…

k

quasiparticle operators

slide6

Anisotropic singlet pairing (cont)

Recap: N = (ck)N/2 |vac>,

All subsequent operations just as in s-wave case, e.g. still have

Fk = Dk /2Ek

but Fk (hence F(r)) now depends on direction of k (r).

Gap equation: nontrivially dependent on dirn. of k-k'.

Resolve V into spherical harmonic components: for |k|~ |k'|~kF.

ck function of direction aswell as magnitude of k.

Legendre polynomial

If for some loVlis appreciably larger than for other l’s, than for |k| ~ kF

spherical harmonic

To find coefficients lm, minimize (free) energy with respect to possible choices (crudely: for given | minimize |

Note optimal solution may involve nontrivially complex

 possible nonzero angular momentum of paired state.

More generally, since for lo 0  must be anisotropic, expect

physical properties anisotropic

Vkk'= lVlPl

k lmYlm()

l

  • m

Dk = -  Vkk'tanh (Ek'/2kBT)

k

slide7

Digression: can an anisotropic Fermi superfluid have (large) angular momentum?

Recap: N = (ck)N/2 |vac>  (+)N/2|vac> *

k

k

l

may be complex

>

Consider e.g. case

ck = f(|k|,k) exp 2ik(d-wave)

Naïve approach (ignore boundaries, etc.):

k

k

= generator of rotations around z-(l-) axis [or explicit calcn.]

ß

zN = NħN

Generalization to nonzero T:

anisotropic F. superfluid has macroscopic (~N) ang. momentum

at any temperature below Tc!

Is this physically correct?

Alternative ansatz:

start with N ground state (F. sea), excite

pairs from |k| < kF to |k| >kF

(details: AJL QL appendix 6A)

This state has

Lz ~Nħ( / EF)2« Nħ

Which is right? (expt.?)

slide8

Spin triplet pairing

Simplest case (“ESP)  equal spin pairing

With suitable choice of spin axes, only parallel spins paired 

|vac> (3)

Pauli principle  ck = -c-k, but in general no particular

wherever ck and ck.

Note (?) is coherentsuperposn. of  and  pairs, not equivalent to

|vac>

 

“Fock” state

Analysis of energetics, etc. parallel to that for singlet pairing, but for spin-conserving potential,  and  gap equations decouple:

Spin susceptibility of ESP state: in small field ℋ.

, 

kF•

kF

kF

Field does not interfere with pair

formation! ESP  n

N-state 

slide9

Spin triplet pairing: the general case

Most general “BCS-like” triplet-paired state:

|vac>

k

ck = ck = -c-k , otherwise arbitrary

Since for given kck is Hermitian, for given k then always exists a choice of spin axes which makes diagonal (ck = ck= 0)

not necessarily unique

In this set of axes can then define e.g.

, etc.

But in general gap eqn. etc. is quite messy. Enormous simplification if state is unitary, df. by

= ind.of  , k.

Then can write in arbitrary spin axes

Fk,  k,/2Ek,

Ek (k2 + |k|2)1/2

}ind. of 

For spin-independent potential

|k|2 ( |k,|2

<V> = Vkk'FkFk'

 Gap eqn.:

i.e. gap eqns. For different matrix element  decoupled

slide10

The d-vector notation (unitary states)

Consider e.g. the pair w.f. or its FT For any given k can find choice of spin axes so that

and from definition of unitary state.

For 2 particles of spin

d = real vector up to overall phase in xy-plane making awith y-axis, with magnitude equal to

Generalizing to arbitrary reference frame, any unitary phase described by specifying for each k Technically, in an arb. reference frame

In BCS case d(k) is usually a function only of k/