1 / 15

( Very )Fast simulation of the neutral beam

( Very )Fast simulation of the neutral beam. A.Cassese. NA48 neutral beam (1998-99). NA48 neutral beam (2001). Summary NA48 2001-like. 400 GeV /c instead of 450: factor 0.81 2.4 mrad ( incidence ), ±0.15 mrad ( acceptance seen at 126 m from T10)

liesel
Download Presentation

( Very )Fast simulation of the neutral beam

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. (Very)Fast simulationof the neutralbeam A.Cassese

  2. NA48 neutralbeam (1998-99)

  3. NA48 neutralbeam (2001)

  4. Summary NA48 2001-like • 400 GeV/c insteadof 450: factor0.81 • 2.4 mrad (incidence), ±0.15 mrad (acceptanceseen at 126 m from T10) • 2.4x1012pppinsteadof 1.5x1012ppp: factor1.6 • 4.8s/16.8s duty cycle • Same KL spectrum at 400 and 450 GeV/c: 110 GeV/c mean KL momentum • 0.81x1.6x6.4x106 KL/spill 70<p<170 GeV/c • 8.3x106 KL/spill 70<p<170 GeV/c • 1.4x105 KL decays/spill 70<p<170 GeV/c, 0<z<60 m • 3.6x1010 KL decays/year 70<p<170 GeV/c, 0<z<60 m (1y = 100d, 50% eff)

  5. Baseline NA62 neutral • x10 in protonintensity (2.4x1013ppp) • Samemomentum, same inc. angle, same duty cycle,…. as NA48-2001 • Samefinalcollbut at 101 m wrt 126 m (±0.20 mradinsteadof ±0.15 mrad): factor (0.20/0.15)2 = 1.8 • Consider 50<p<200 GeVinsteadof 70<p<170 GeV/c: factor1.6 (slidesworshop 1998) • 10x1.8x1.6x3.6x1010 1x1012 • 1x1012 KL decays/year 50<p<200 GeV/c, 0<z<60 m (1y = 100d, 50% eff)

  6. Approach • Take the “working” MC for NA62 (withK+ at 75 GeV/c) • “Replace” a p+withp0 and check the acceptance • Assume 1x1012 KL decay in fiducial volume (105 < z < 165 m) per year • Assume 10-8p0 veto capability (NA62-like)

  7. K+→π+KL→π0 • 75 GeV/c kaonmomentum • Replacep+withp0 • 10000 generatedevents • 3616 events105<z(vertex)<165 m • 3733 events 2 gamma in Lkr (anyvertex) • 1681 events 2 gamma in Lkr, 105<z<165 m • p0acceptance on LKr: 46.5%±0.8% • ExpectedsignaleventsKL→π0: Ndecays x BR x Acc = 1x1012x2.4x10-11x46.5% = 11.1 events in 1 year

  8. KL→π0

  9. K+→π+p0KL→π0p0 • 75 GeV/c kaonmomentum, Replacep+withp0 • 10000 generatedevents • 3633 events 105<z(truevertex)<165 m • 7982 events >=2 gamma in LKr • 3049 2gamma in Lkr • 3499 3gamma in Lkr • 1434 4gamma in Lkr • 6232 events >=2gamma from pi0 (Even) • 67 events >= 2 overlapped gamma (Ngamma>=3), overlap<10cm at Lkr • 105<z(reconstructed)<165 m: EvenOdd(combinatorics) • 2gamma 442 336 • 3gamma 1707 1867 • 4gamma 1217 1896 • Total(couples) 3366 4099 • p0 “effective” acceptance (Even): 3366/3633 = 92.7%±0.4% • Expected background eventsKL→π0p0: Ndecays x BR x Acc x Veto= 1x1012x0.9x10-3x92.7%x10-8 = 8.3 “even” background events in 1 year • p0 “effective” acceptance (Odd): 4099/3633 = 112.8% • Expected background events KL→π0p0: Ndecays x BR x Acc x Veto= 1x1012x0.9x10-3x112.8%x10-8 = 10.1 “odd” background events in 1 year “Even”: 2 gamma from the same pi0 “Odd”: 1γfromone pi0, 1γfrom the otherpi0 All the combinations: 1 in 2gamma, 1 even and 2 odd (3gamma), 2 even and 4 odd (4gamma)

  10. KL→π0p0“Even” E and Ptof pi0 reconstructed in Lkr

  11. KL→π0p0“Odd” E and Ptof pi0 reconstructed in Lkr

  12. 181 overflows KL→π0p0“Even” Angle of the gammasnotusedfor pi0 reconstructedifoutsideLKr 190 overflows KL→π0p0“Odd”

  13. KL→π0p0“Even” Enlarged scale Angle of the gammasnotusedfor pi0 reconstructedifoutsideLKr KL→π0p0“Odd”

  14. KL→π0p0“Even” Enlarged scale Energy of the pi0 seen in LKr (mimicking the signale) vs Angle of the gammas(notusedfor pi0 reconstruction) outsideLKr KL→π0p0“Odd”

  15. Conclusions • Very fast and roughsimulation (75 GeV/c Kaonmomentum) • Expect: 11.1 signalevents in oneyear • Expect: 8.3 background eventsfrom KL->p0p0with the 2 gcomingfrom the samep0(assuming 10-8p0 veto eff.) • Expect: 10.1 background eventsfrom KL->p0p0with the 2 gcomingfromdifferentp0 (assuming 10-8p0 veto eff.) • 10-8 p0 veto eff. Notjustifiedwithpresent LAV coverage: • Prob 1 g q>50 mrad: 181/3366 = (5.4±0.4)% (“Even”) • Prob 1 g q>50 mrad: 190/4099 = (4.6±0.3)% (“Odd”) • Tobecomparedwithfew per mille in NA62 (Ep0>40 GeV) • Only cut applied: reconstructedvertex position (imposing mp0 mass): 105<z<165 m • No cut no Ep0 and PTp0yet

More Related