slide1 l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Competition PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 41

Competition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Competition Population growth is almost always controlled by density. Density regulation implies: Resources are limited Individuals in the population are competing with one another Intraspecific, density-dependant, competition and population regulation

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Population growth is almost always controlled by density.

  • Density regulation implies:
    • Resources are limited
    • Individuals in the population are competing with one another

Intraspecific, density-dependant, competition and population regulation

As density of individuals (in the same living space) increases, tadpole growth rate decreases.

At high density, they have lower final weight.


Intraspecific, density-dependant, competition and population regulation

As density of white clover increases, mean weight per plant decreases sharply.

Resources are finite- increasing the number of individuals decreases the amount available to each individual.


As density of horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) decreases, mean weight of each individual plant increases.


As density of harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) increases, resources are depleted- it takes longer to reach the needed weight for reproduction. (reproduction is density-dependant)


The area an animal visits during a year is the home range. Usually not defended. Provides access to resources.

Larger animals need more space. Carnivores need more space than omnivores or herbivores.


Many animals also have definable territories. This is the area that a given individual (or small group of individuals, e.g., a lion pride) defends against intruders.

Provides stable access to resources, shelter, and sometimes secures mating opportunities.


Plants do not have territories, but they do aggressively acquire and maintain growing space.

  • One of the most prominent examples is root competition.
  • Plants compete for resources via root networks that gather water and nutrients
  • Belowground competition influences aboveground growth

In many plant communities (esp. forests), light is an important limiting resource.

  • Individuals that can acquire canopy space often have long & productive the understory, carbon is limited, and individuals are less successful.
  • Getting tall is a good idea

Bottom line- resources are scarce, populations cannot grow indefinitely. Individuals respond to this scarcity in a variety of ways.


Most ecological systems are complex & messy: landscapes are heterogeneous, resources are patchy, and climate conditions dynamic.

Population growth is regulated by this messiness, but also depends on resource depletion due to intraspecies competition.

But, monocultures are rare in nature, so we have to think more broadly about population regulation- and consider the role of other species (ie, interspecies competition)


Often in nature, many species compete for the same resources

(light, nutrients- food, shelter).

Individual species have differing traits, capabilities, resource requirements.

Competition between species is often decided by these trait differences and resource requirements.

Ecologists have used simplified model systems to understand interspecies competition, and then tested that theory on more natural systems.


Alfred Lotka and Vittora Volterra independently, and simultaneously, derived a model to explain the outcome of competition between two species“Lotka-Volterra Model” predicts four outcomes of competition between two species (X & Y): 1) X always wins 2) Y always wins 3) Outcome depends on the initial density of each 4) X & Y coexist


Classic experiment by G.F. Gause used Paramecium

Generally supported the Lotka-Volterra Model.

Separately each species grew more than when combined (suggests interspecific competition greater than intraspecific competition)

P. aurelia drove P. caudatum to extinction.


Further work by Tilman with diatoms also supported Lotka-Volterra

Separately each species does well, and lowers the silicate level in the habitat.

When grown together, one species drives the other to extinction by lowering the silicate level below tolerable levels for the other species.


Over time, access to resources can change- shifting the competitive balance between two species.


Stipa neomexicana

Removal of neighbors (white dots) increases seedling survival

Greater increase on ridges than on mid- or lower slopes.

Competition varies along environmental gradients.


Stipa neomexicana

Removal of neighbors (white dots) increases seedling individual growth, too


Stipa neomexicana

Removal of neighbors (white dots) increases flowers per/plant, too.

Same environmental pattern


Competition is an important force in natural settings, and lab environments.

  • Experimentation and theory have combined to support the Competitive Exclusion Theory: Two species cannot coexist (in the same space) if they require exactly the same resources.

G.E. Hutchinson was puzzled by the tension between competitive exclusion and the Diversity of Life....